A comprehensive analysis of means of expression of epistemic modality in French-language fictional discourse

Keywords: context, epistemic modality, situation, utterance

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of means of expression of epistemic modality in modern French-speaking discourse. The conceptual base of modality manifestations finds its implementation in language, through which a person convey their knowledge, competences and attitude to the world. The results of scientific research led to recognition of the trichotomous nature of the category of modality: aletic, epistemic and deontic. Epistemic modality is directly related to the speaker’s knowledge of the world, his trust or distrust of reality, and to the information provided in the utterance. The epistemic probability of the realization of the fact has such conceptual aspects as availability, predictability, possibility - impossibility (partial or total). Epistemic modality can also be objective or subjective. The objective epistemic modality is conveyed through the grammatical forms of the verb in Conditional I and II. As for subjective epistemic modality, it is found in specific lexical modalizers. In fictional discourse, epistemic modality occurs in communicative situations that manifest themselves on a larger scale, such as context. In the trichotomous division “utterance - situation - context”, each part has its own role and reflects the author’s idea depending on the general content. The means of implementing the author’s ideas, which are modally marked, are analyzed from the point of view of the presence in them of specific modalizers, grammatical forms of verbs in Conditional mode I and II, given the role of the situation and context. Grammatical and lexical language means, through which the speaker’s attitude to reality is reproduced, are not the same in content, they can be divided into four main groups depending on the degree of confidence - uncertainty, probability - improbability. In fictional discourse, through these means, the author reveals his attitude to reality, to the world, as well as the attitude of the characters of the work to them. For this purpose, the writer uses a whole arsenal of modal markers with the value of confidence - uncertainty, probability - improbability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Frolova, I. Ye. (2015). Rehuliatyvnyj potentsial stratehii konfrontatsii v anhlomovnomu dyskursi (Avtoref. dokt. filol. nauk). [Regulatory potential of confrontation strategy in English discourse (Doctor of Science in Philology Thesis synopsis)]. Kharkivs’kyj natsional’nyj universytet imeni V. N. Karazina, Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian)

Frolova, I. Ye. Ometsyns’ka, O. V. (2018). Spetsyfika khudozhn’oho dyskursu ta joho aspektiv [Specificity and aspects of fiction¬al discourse]. Visnyk Kharkivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Inozemna filolohiia» [Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series “Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching], 87, 52–61. (in Ukrainian)

Kononenko, V. I. (2021) Prahmatyka khudozhn’oho tekstu: poshuky novostyliu [Pragmatics of fictional text: searching for a new style]. Kyiv; Ivano-Frankivs’k: Prykarpat. nats. un-t im. Vasylia Stefanyka Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Prybluda, L. M. (2022). Khudozhnij dyskurs: problema interpretatsii [Fictional discourse: the problem of interpretation.]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernads’koho. Seriia: Filolohiia. Zhurnalistyka [Scientific papers of V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: “Philology. Journalism”], 1 (ch.1, t. 33(72)), 78 – 82. (in Ukrainian)

Semeniuk, O. A. (2019). Khudozhnij dyskurs iak vidobrazhennia avtors’koi kartyny svitu (linhvokul’turolohichnyj pidkhid) [Fictional discourse as a reflection of the author’s picture of the world (linguistic-cultural approach)]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I .Vernads’koho. Seriia: Filolohiia. Sotsial’ni komunikatsii [Scientific papers of V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: “Philology. Journalism”], 1 (t. 30 (69)), 7–10. (in Ukrainian)

Shevchenko, I. S. (2005). Kohnityvno-prahmatychni doslidzhennia dyskursu [Cognitive and pragmatic studies of discourse]. Dyskurs iak kohnityvno-kommunikatyvnyj fenomen [Discourse as acognitive and communicative phenomenon] (рр. 105–117). Kharkiv: Konstanta Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Shylo, S. (2017). Poniattievi sfery terminiv dlia nominatsii sponukal’noi modal’nosti [Conceptual spheres of terms for the nomina¬tion of motivational modality]. Aktual’ni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk [Topical Issues of the Humanities], 17, 162 – 165. (in Ukrainian)

Vojtenko, L. I. (2020). Khudozhnia literatura iak forma komunikatsii [Fiction as a form of communication]. Odesa: ONU imeni I.I. Mechnykova Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Le Querler, N. (1996).Typologie des modalités. Caen.

Le Querler, N. (2004). Les modalités en français. Revue belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 643 – 656.

Raimond, M. (2000). Le roman. Paris: Armand Colin.

Thue Vold, E. (2008) Modalité épisthémique et discours scientifique. Bergen.

ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIAL

Allais, A. (1972). Plaisir d’humour. Paris: Edition de Fallois.

Carco, F. (1984). Rien qu’une femme. Paris: Albin Michel.

Giono, J. (1970). Regain. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

Troyat, H. (1965). Le vivier. Paris: Hatier.

Published
2023-12-25
How to Cite
VoroninaМ., & Nesterenko, O. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of means of expression of epistemic modality in French-language fictional discourse. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (98), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-5312-2023-98-02