DIRECTED MIGRATION AS THE MEANS TO ACHIEVE THE HYBRID WAR GOALS

Keywords: directed migration; hybrid warfare; manipulative influence; conflictogenity; mass communication means

Abstract

The need to study the contemporary migration processes inter alia taking into account the feasibility of using them as the means of the domestic and foreign policy, for example to achieve the goals of the hybrid war was substantiated. On the one hand it can be explained by the changing approaches to the realization of political interests, particularly to the waging of war; on the other hand – by the peculiarities of the contemporary migration processes. It was shown that for the migration processes to be used they have to be eligible to external influence, besides they can be influenced in a hidden way or their use can be explained by the acceptable purposes. They must also be effective enough that means their use can help actor to achieve its political goal. The concept of the directed migration was introduced and the ways the directing of migration processes can be executed at the different stages of the migration process were shown as well as the role of the informatization and mass communication. Particularly, the assumption was made that the hybrid conflict in a particular region can be waged just to initiate and stimulate migration in order to destabilize the situation in the region where the migration flows are directed to. Possibilities of using directed migration by a political actor to destabilize the political, socio-economic and ideological spheres of the target country or region from within were also analyzed. Given that, both the country of origin and the host country can be regarded as the target one. The increasing of conflictogenity of the society due to the horizontal inequality transformation between migrants and host community was presented as an example.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Y. Danyk

Prof., Dr. Techn. Sc. National Defenсe University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi 28, Povitroflotskyi av., Kyiv, 03049

M. Semenkova

Lecturer, National Defenсe University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi, 28, Povitroflotskyi av., Kyiv, 03049

References

REFERENCES

Reuveny, R. 2007. “Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict”, Political Geography, 26: 656-673.

Massey, D. 2015. “Theory of migration“. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.

Dancygier, R. 2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Humphrey, M. 2013. “Migration, security and insecurity”. Intercultural Studies 34: 178-195.

Crawford, M., Campbell, B. 2012. Causes and Consequences of Human Migration. An Evolutionary Perspective. New York.

Gibney, M., Apodaca, C, McCann, J. 1996. Refugee Flows, the Internally Displaced and Political Violence (1908-1993): An Exploratory Analysis.

Bigo, D. 2002. “Security and immigration: toward a critique of governmentality of unease”, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 1: 63-92.

Malinovska, O.A. 2015. Migration policy: global context and Ukrainian reality: monorgaphy. К., National Institute of Strategic Studies.

Chauvet, L., Collier, P. 2005. Development Effectiveness in Fragile States: Spillovers and Turnarounds. URL: http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC16180.htm.

Crawford, M., Campbell, B. 2012. Causes and Consequences of Human Migration. An Evolutionary Perspective. New York.

Poznjak, О., Libanova, Y. 2010. The population of Ukraine. Labour emigration in Ukraine. К.: Institute of Demography and Social studies n.a. M. Ptukha.

Hoffman, F. 2007. Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.

Hoffman, F. 2009. “Hybrid Warfare and Challenges”. Joint Force Quarterly, 1st Quarter, 52: 34–39.

Murray, W., Mansoor, P. 2012. Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mattis, J. 2005. “Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars”, Proceedings, November: 18-19.

McCuen, J.J. 2008. “Hybrid Wars”, Military Review, April-May: 107–113.

Danyk, Y., Katkov, Y., Pitchugin, M. 2006. National security: the prevention of critical situations: Monography, Zhynomyr: Ruta, 2006.

Danyk, Y., Pitchugin, M. 2008. “The problem of effective state management in the sphere of national security and defence in the conditions of the realization of strategy of “non-violent means”, The Collection of scientific works of ZMINAU. Zhytomyr: ZMIRE, 1: 9-17.

Danyk, Y., Semenkova, M. 2019. “Migration within the context of hybrid warfare and its potential for conflict”, SDirect 24, 3(8).

Massey, D.S. 1990. “Social structure, household strategies and the cumulative causation of migration”, Population index, 56 (1): 3-26.

Rushchenko, I. 2015. “The undermining social technologies in the structure of the hybrid warfare”. Pravo i bezpeka, 2 (57).

Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
Danyk, Y., & Semenkova, M. (2019). DIRECTED MIGRATION AS THE MEANS TO ACHIEVE THE HYBRID WAR GOALS. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 35, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2019-35-09