MODELS AND CONCEPTS OF MODERNIZATION OF GOVERNMENT

Keywords: modernization; public administration; bureaucratic model of public administration; model of new public administration; network model

Abstract

Modernization changes the basic target, functional, structural principles of building public administration, thereby there is a paradigm shift in understanding its place and mission in the state-market-civil society relationship. The bureaucratic model of public administration belongs to the old paradigm, the new government and network models belong to the new paradigm.

These models are contradictory intertwined under the influence of globalization and decentralization on modernization processes in public administration, which creates new problems in adapting administrative hierarchies (bureaucracies) to global challenges and the requirements of devolution. The problem arises of integrating new horizontal connections (networks) into traditional vertical structures. At the same time, the problem of the state’s ability to increase the efficiency of officials’s actions in conditions of rapid environmental transformation is exacerbating. In addition, there is a problem of scale, traditional for public administration, i.e. the correspondence of functions and resources at different managerial levels to the nature and volume of existing tasks. The solution of these problems at the transit stage largely depends on the nature of the emerging institutional paths and the reform strategy, its focus on maintaining a balance of stability and changes based on the experience of previous transformations. The managerial model of priority for many reformers, with its inevitable decentralization carried out in an institutional environment that has not reached the necessary level of self-organization and accountability, will obviously entail the progressive loss of autonomy by the state bureaucracy from special interest groups. Strengthening the role of informal managerial practices in the face of non-established norms of administrative ethics will not provide unbiased impersonal law enforcement.

However, criticism of the new government does not make the choice of bureaucratic or network models justified. The priority is not the choice of one or another theoretical model of modernization as its goal, but the process of developing a policy for its implementation. The criterion of manageability, reflecting the development of modernization abilities of public administration, provides guidance for institutional construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

П. А. Божко

PhD student, Department of Political Science, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022

References

ЛІТЕРАТУРА

Вебер, М. 1990. “Политика как призвание и профессия”. В: Избр. произведения. Москва: 646-668.

Мертон, Р. М. 2003. “Бюрократическая структура и индивидуальность”. В: Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа. М., Изд-во Московского ун-та: 131-141.

Hunold, C. 2001. “Corporatism, Pluralism, and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 14 (2) : 151- 167.

Niskanen, W.A. 1994. Bureaucracy and Public Economics Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Eisenstadt, S. N. 1963. “Bureaucracy and Political Development”. In: Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Osborn, D., Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York.

Haque, M.S. 2000. “Significance of Accountability under the New Approach to Public Governance”, International Review of Administrative Sciences. 66: 601-609.

Frederickson, H. G. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Kettl, D.F. 2012. The Politics of the Administrative Process. Washington, DC: SAGE: 220-221.

Сморгунов, Л.В. 2001. “Сетевой подход к политике и управлению”, Политические исследования, 3: 103-112.

Castells, М. 2000. “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society”, Contemporary Sociology, 29 (№ 5): 696.

Сморгунов, Л.В. 2009. “Концепция “способностей государстваˮ, конструктивизм и развитие теории государственного управления”, Государственное управление в XXI веке: традиции и инновации: М-лы 6-й междунар. конф. факультета государственного управления МГУ им. М.В.Ло-моносова 29-31 мая 2008 года. Москва: 403-419.

Kjcer, A.M. 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

REFERENCES

Weber, M. 1990. “Politics as a vocation and profession”. In: Selected Works. Moscow: 646-668 (in Russian)

Merton R. M. 2003. “Bureaucratic structure and personality”. In: Klassyky teoryy hosudarstvennoho upravlenyia: amerykanskaia shkola. M., Publishing House of Moscow University: 131-141 (in Russian)

Hunold, C. 2001. “Corporatism, Pluralism, and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 14 ( № 2) : 151-167.

Niskanen, W.A. 1994. Bureaucracy and Public Economics Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Eisenstadt, S. N. 1963. “Bureaucracy and Political Development”. In: Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Osborn, D., Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York.

Haque, M.S. 2000. “Significance of Accountability under the New Approach to Public Governance”, International Review of Administrative Sciences. 66: 601-609.

Frederickson, H. G. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Kettl, D.F. 2012. The Politics of the Administrative Process. Washington, DC: SAGE: 220-221.

Smorhunov L.V. 2001. “A network approach to politics and governance”, Polytycheskye yssledovanyia, 3: 103-112 (in Russian)

Castells, М. 2000. “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society”, Contemporary Sociology, 29 (№ 5): 696.

Smorhunov, L.V. 2009. “The concept of “state abilities”, constructivism and the development of the theory of public administration”, Public Administration in the 21st Century: Traditions and Innovations: Intern. 6 Conference Proceedings Faculty of Public Administration, Moscow State University M.V. Lomonosova (29-31.05.2008) Moscow: 403-419 (in Russian)

Kjcer, A.M. 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
Божко, П. А. (2019). MODELS AND CONCEPTS OF MODERNIZATION OF GOVERNMENT. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 35, 28-36. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2019-35-04