MODELS AND CONCEPTS OF MODERNIZATION OF GOVERNMENT
Abstract
Modernization changes the basic target, functional, structural principles of building public administration, thereby there is a paradigm shift in understanding its place and mission in the state-market-civil society relationship. The bureaucratic model of public administration belongs to the old paradigm, the new government and network models belong to the new paradigm.
These models are contradictory intertwined under the influence of globalization and decentralization on modernization processes in public administration, which creates new problems in adapting administrative hierarchies (bureaucracies) to global challenges and the requirements of devolution. The problem arises of integrating new horizontal connections (networks) into traditional vertical structures. At the same time, the problem of the state’s ability to increase the efficiency of officials’s actions in conditions of rapid environmental transformation is exacerbating. In addition, there is a problem of scale, traditional for public administration, i.e. the correspondence of functions and resources at different managerial levels to the nature and volume of existing tasks. The solution of these problems at the transit stage largely depends on the nature of the emerging institutional paths and the reform strategy, its focus on maintaining a balance of stability and changes based on the experience of previous transformations. The managerial model of priority for many reformers, with its inevitable decentralization carried out in an institutional environment that has not reached the necessary level of self-organization and accountability, will obviously entail the progressive loss of autonomy by the state bureaucracy from special interest groups. Strengthening the role of informal managerial practices in the face of non-established norms of administrative ethics will not provide unbiased impersonal law enforcement.
However, criticism of the new government does not make the choice of bureaucratic or network models justified. The priority is not the choice of one or another theoretical model of modernization as its goal, but the process of developing a policy for its implementation. The criterion of manageability, reflecting the development of modernization abilities of public administration, provides guidance for institutional construction.
Downloads
References
ЛІТЕРАТУРА
Вебер, М. 1990. “Политика как призвание и профессия”. В: Избр. произведения. Москва: 646-668.
Мертон, Р. М. 2003. “Бюрократическая структура и индивидуальность”. В: Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа. М., Изд-во Московского ун-та: 131-141.
Hunold, C. 2001. “Corporatism, Pluralism, and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 14 (2) : 151- 167.
Niskanen, W.A. 1994. Bureaucracy and Public Economics Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1963. “Bureaucracy and Political Development”. In: Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Osborn, D., Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York.
Haque, M.S. 2000. “Significance of Accountability under the New Approach to Public Governance”, International Review of Administrative Sciences. 66: 601-609.
Frederickson, H. G. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kettl, D.F. 2012. The Politics of the Administrative Process. Washington, DC: SAGE: 220-221.
Сморгунов, Л.В. 2001. “Сетевой подход к политике и управлению”, Политические исследования, 3: 103-112.
Castells, М. 2000. “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society”, Contemporary Sociology, 29 (№ 5): 696.
Сморгунов, Л.В. 2009. “Концепция “способностей государстваˮ, конструктивизм и развитие теории государственного управления”, Государственное управление в XXI веке: традиции и инновации: М-лы 6-й междунар. конф. факультета государственного управления МГУ им. М.В.Ло-моносова 29-31 мая 2008 года. Москва: 403-419.
Kjcer, A.M. 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
REFERENCES
Weber, M. 1990. “Politics as a vocation and profession”. In: Selected Works. Moscow: 646-668 (in Russian)
Merton R. M. 2003. “Bureaucratic structure and personality”. In: Klassyky teoryy hosudarstvennoho upravlenyia: amerykanskaia shkola. M., Publishing House of Moscow University: 131-141 (in Russian)
Hunold, C. 2001. “Corporatism, Pluralism, and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 14 ( № 2) : 151-167.
Niskanen, W.A. 1994. Bureaucracy and Public Economics Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1963. “Bureaucracy and Political Development”. In: Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Osborn, D., Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York.
Haque, M.S. 2000. “Significance of Accountability under the New Approach to Public Governance”, International Review of Administrative Sciences. 66: 601-609.
Frederickson, H. G. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kettl, D.F. 2012. The Politics of the Administrative Process. Washington, DC: SAGE: 220-221.
Smorhunov L.V. 2001. “A network approach to politics and governance”, Polytycheskye yssledovanyia, 3: 103-112 (in Russian)
Castells, М. 2000. “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society”, Contemporary Sociology, 29 (№ 5): 696.
Smorhunov, L.V. 2009. “The concept of “state abilities”, constructivism and the development of the theory of public administration”, Public Administration in the 21st Century: Traditions and Innovations: Intern. 6 Conference Proceedings Faculty of Public Administration, Moscow State University M.V. Lomonosova (29-31.05.2008) Moscow: 403-419 (in Russian)
Kjcer, A.M. 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).