Street art in urban space: location and perception in Ukrainian cities
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this research was to analyze the thematic orientation, drivers, location and perception by residents of street art in Ukrainian cities. Accordingly, the research questions are as follows: where and which street art pieces are located in cities? what are the main triggers of their spread in urban space? how city residents percept street art? what dwellers think about impact of street art on socio-cultural space and should street art be regulated in cities?
Research methods. The study is based on an analysis of media reports on street art, the results of in-depth semi-structured interviews with Kyiv residents, and the authors’ observations on the streets of several Ukrainian cities. Twelve semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with Kyiv residents in April-May 2021, which included blocks of questions on the perception of street art, its subject matter, location and the need to control and regulate their creation and distribution. The authors conducted observations on the streets during 2017-2021 in the cities of Kyiv, Dnipro, Kharkiv, Odesa, Poltava, Kamyanets-Podilskyi, and Kramatorsk.
Main findings. Based on the previous research, the main forms of street art and their place in urban space are analyzed. The analysis of street art pieces in Ukraine showed that in general there are tendencies of decentralization of their location in the urban space and regionalization. In other words, street art is spreading from the city center to the periphery, and along with the capital city and the main regional centers, street art pieces are becoming common elements of the urban space of other cities and towns. The vision of the residents testifies to their demand for the conformity of new street art pieces to the socio-cultural environment, the appropriateness of placement, and “embeddedness” into the urban space.
It was revealed that key drivers of street art booming in Ukraine are urban art festivals, mega events, socio-political events and social troubles, developers` initiatives, as well as participatory budgeting programs. At the same time, the methods of implementation, thematic orientation and location of street art can cause conflicts and protests from individual residents, social movements, and municipalities as well.
An analysis of the attitude to the thematic orientation of street art showed that the topics of nature, images of prominent people with an unblemished reputation, representatives of the most important professions, national, patriotic and social topics that encourage reflection, as well as texts of famous poems and quotations are most welcoming for Kyiv residents. The attitude to political issues accompanied by various appeals is distinctly negative. It has been confirmed that the local context of street art objects is considered as more important. It is shown that with the generally positive perception of street art, city dwellers are interested in the need to control and regulate the location of new murals and other street art pieces taking into account the public participation principles. In a relatively short period, street art have become a common practice of renewal, "beatification" and "Europeanization" of the urban space of many Ukrainian cities.
Scientific novelty and practical value. The article develops the understanding of the place of street art in the urban space revealing the main peculiarities of the location, distribution and perception of street art in Ukrainian cities. The practical value of the study lies in the focus on identifying prospects for the implementation of the principles of participatory urban planning in the context of the creation of new street art pieces as a mean of improving public spaces.
Downloads
References
Jacobs, J. (2021). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Kyiv, CANactions. [In Ukrainian]
Gehl, J. (2018). Cities for People. Kyiv, Osnovy. [In Ukrainian]
Landry, Ch. (2006). The Creative City. Moscow: Classics ХХІ [In Russian]
McAuliffe, C. (2012). Graffiti or Street Art? Negotiating the Moral Geographies of the Creative City. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00610.x
Chang, T.C. (2019). Writing on the Wall: Street Art in Graffiti-free Singapore. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(6), 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12653
Baldini, A. (2015). An Urban Carnival on the City Walls: The Visual Representation of Financial Power in Euro-pean Street Art. Journal of Visual Culture, 14(2), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412915592883
Moldoveanu, M., & Franc, V. (2014). Urban regeneration and more opportunities for artistic expression and cul-tural consumption. Procedia. Economics and Finance, 8, 490–496.
Havrylash, I.S. (2018). Mural art in the context of the mass culture of the 21st century. Issues in Cultural studies, 34, 133–142. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1311.34.2018.154059
Havrylash, I.S. (2018). Murals and graffiti in modern Ukraine: features and differences. Culture of Ukraine, 62, 235–244. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.062.23
Havryliuk, B. (2018). Ukrainian mural in terms of global art. Bulletin of the Lviv National Academy of Arts, 37, 241–254. [In Ukrainian]
Mezentsev, K., Oliinyk, Y., & Mezentseva, N. (eds.) (2017). Urban Ukraine: in the epicenter of spatial changes. Ky-iv: Fenix. [In Ukrainian]
Mezentsev, K., & Mezentseva, N. (2017). Modern transformations of Kyiv public spaces: prerequisites, manifesta-tion and specifications. Human Geography Journal, 22(1), 39–46. [In Ukrainian]
Mezentsev, K., & Provotar, N. (2020). Kyiv’s Socialist-Time Neighbourhoods: an Ocean of Greyness Against Rain-bowfication? CANactions Magazine. MIKRORAYONS, 1, 94–110.
Turkington, R. (2004). Britain. High-rise housing as a ‘doubtful guest’. In: Turkington, R., van Kempen, R., & Was-senberg, F. (eds.) High-rise housing in Europe. Current trends and future prospects. Housing and urban policy studies, 28. Delft University Press, pp. 147-164.
Maslyak, P.O., Gryniuk, O.Y., & Kazantseva, K.A. (2017). Influence of street-art on the formation image and the principles of street-art geographical zones. Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Geology. Geography. Ecology", 46, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2017-46-15
Olishevska, Yu. (2020). Murals as the newest tourist resources: the case of Kyiv. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. 29(2), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.15421/112032
Romaniv, O.Ya., Rybachok O.M., & Savelieva, D.V. (2019). Strit-art v turystychnomu prostori Zhytomyra [Street art in the space of the tourist environment of Zhytomyr]. Geography and Tourism, 54, 41–49. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.17721/2308-135X.2019.54.41-49
Hawkins, H. (2012). Geography and art. An expanding field: Site, the body and practice. Progress in Human Geog-raphy, 37(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512442865
Conklin, T.R. (2012). Street Art, Ideology, and Public Space. Dissertations and Theses. Paper 761, 332 p. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.761
Molnár, V. (2017). Street Art and the Changing Urban Public Sphere. Public Culture, 29(2), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3749117
Dovey, K., Woolan, S., & Woodcock, I. (2012) Placing graffiti: creating and contesting character in innercity Mel-bourne. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1), 21–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646248
Males, L.V., Sereda, V.V., Sobolevska, М. O., & Soroka Yu.G. (2010). Urban Sociology. Donetsk, Noulidzh. [In Ukrainian]
Guinard, P., & Margier, А. (2018). Art as a new urban norm: Between normalization of the City through art and normalization of art through the City in Montreal and Johannesburg. Cities, 77, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.018
Müller, A.-L. (2019). Voices in the city. On the role of arts, artists and urban space for a just city Cities, 91, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.004
Niemets, L., Husieva, N., Suptelo, O., Sehida K., & Kravchenko K. (2018). Research of Brownfields and Greyfields of the City: Theory and Practice. In: Soliman, Kh.S. (ed.). Proceedings of the 32nd International Business Infor-mation Management Association Conference. Seville, International Business Information Management Associa-tion (IBIMA), pp. 409–435.
Omar, S.S, Sakip S., Akhir N.M. (2016). Bringing the New to the Old: Urban Regeneration through Public Arts. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 515–524.
Podnos, V., Gryshchenko, M., Verbytskyi, I., & Tyshchenko, I. (2017). Murals – the embodiment of symbolic power to change the image of the city. Mistosite. [In Ukrainian] Retrieved from: https://mistosite.org.ua/en/articles/muraly-vt%D1%96lennya-symvol%D1%96chnoyi-vlady-dlya-zm%D1%96ny-obrazu-m%D1%96sta
Christensen, M., & Thor, T. (2017). The reciprocal city: Performing solidarity – Mediating space through street art and graffiti. International Communication Gazette, 79(6-7), 584–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048517727183
Borghini, S., Visconti, L., Anderson, L., & Sherry, J. (2010). Symbiotic Postures of Commercial Advertising and Street Art: Rhetoric for Creativity. Journal of Advertising, 39(3), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367390308
Visconti, L.M., Sherry Jr., J.F., Borghini, S., & Anderson, L. (2010). Street Art, Sweet Art? Reclaiming the “Public” in Public Place. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1086/652731
Kendall, D. (2011). Street Art: A Window to a City's Soul. Huffington Post, February 15. Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dylan-kendall/street-arta-window-to-a-_b_823592.html?ir=Los%20Angeles
Kramer, R. (2010) Painting with permission: legal graffiti in New York City. Ethnography, 11(2), 235–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138109339122
McAuliffe, C., & Iveson, K. (2011) Art and crime (and other things besides…): conceptualising graffiti in the city. Geography Compass, 5(3), 128–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00414.x
Park, H., & Kоvacs, J.F. (2020). Arts-led revitalization, overtourism and community responses: Ihwa Mural Village, Seoul. Tourism Management Perspectives, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100729
Ross, J., Bengtsen, Р., Lennon, J., Phillips, S., & Wilson, J. (2017). In search of academic legitimacy: The current state of scholarship on graffiti and street art. The Social Science Journal, 54(4), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.08.004
Martínez-Carazo, E.-M., Santamarina-Campos, V., & de-Miguel-Molina, M. (2021). Creative Mural Landscapes, Building Communities and Resilience in Uruguayan Tourism. Sustainability, 13, 5953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115953
Mezentsev, K.V., Provotar, N.I., & Palchuk, M.V. (2020). Public spaces through the lens of participatory urban planning – the case of Kyiv. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 2, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.02.030
Bacharach, S. (2015). Street Art and Consent. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 55(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayv030
Campos, R., & Sequeira, Á. (2020). Urban Art touristification: The case of Lisbon. Tourist Studies, 20(2), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797619873108
Ehrenfeucht, R. (2014). Art, public spaces, and private property along the streets of New Orleans. Urban Geogra-phy, 35(7), 965–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.945260
Iveson, K. (2010). Introduction: Graffiti, street art and the city. City, 14(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604811003638320
Vilaseca, S. (2012). From Graffiti to Street Art: How Urban Artists are Democratizing Spanish City Centers and Street. Transitions: Journal of Franco-Iberian studies, 8 (1), 9-34.
