Copywriting life hacks: conceptual structure of electronic gadget advertisements in English
Abstract
In the consumerist society of the 21st century, advertisement has become an inalienable part of human life. To create it, copywriters apply various strategies and techniques in order to influence the mind of people urging them to buy the item they promote. The aim of the article is expose these mechanisms of influence by analyzing the conceptual structure that underlies English-language written texts advertising electronic devices. This structure is modeled via employing the notion of semantic roles and the methodology of semantics of lingual networks (namely, basic propositional schemas) and theory of conceptual metaphor. As the analyzed empirical data show, advertising texts contain three informational foci/roles: PRODUCT, CONSUMER, and MANUFACTURER. Each role can be described with the help of multiple characteristics that viewed as predicates of five basic propositional schemas. By highlighting these features advertisers showcase the fortes of the gadget thus attracting attention of potential buyers and triggering their desire acquire it. The article exposes the combination patterns of the roles and the frequency of usage of their features (some of which are described metaphorically) to deduce an ideal formula copywriters can apply in creating texts that advertise electronic gadgets. Such a perfect advertisement text must present a novel and user-friendly but affordable gizmo of small size and minimal weight that displays seamless performance because of its high-tech hardware and state-of-the-art software. It is increasingly human-like in its features and operations, which makes it a perfect companion for people both in work and in games enabling them to leverage the gadget in a whole gamut of functions.
Downloads
References
Abramova, G. A. (1980). Metafora v tekste anglojazychnoj reklamy. [Metaphor in the advertisement text in English]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, T. G. Shevchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Russian).
Anopina, O. V. (1997). Konceptual’naja struktura anglojazychnoj reklamy kosmetiki. [Conceptual structure of cosmetics advertisement in English]. Unpublished candidate dissertation, Cherkasy State, University, Cherkassy, Ukraine (in Russian).
Arens, W. F., Bove, C. (1992). Contemporary advertising. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Carter, H. (1986). Effective Advertising: The Daily Telegraph Guide for the Small Business. London: Kogan Page.
Emodi, Livina N. (2011). A semantic analysis of the language of advertising. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, Vol. 5 (4), Serial No. 21, 316-326.
Fillmore, C. (1968). The Case for Case. In: Bach and Harms (Ed.): Universals in Linguistic Theory. (pp. 1–25). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Garret, J. (2007). Aristotle on Metaphor. Retrieved from http://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/401s07/arismeta.htm
Goddard, A. (2002). The Language of Advertising: Written Texts. London and New York: Routledge.
Grilihes, I. V. (1978). Pragmaticheskie i leksiko-sintaksicheskie osobennosti reklamnyh tekstov ( na mat-le anglojazychnoj bytovoj reklamy) [Pragmatic and lexical-syntactic properties of advertisement texts (a study of household advertising in English)]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, T. G. Shevchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Russian).
Johnson, F. L. (2012). Imaging in Advertising: Verbal and Visual Codes of Commerce. Oxford: Routledge.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lizhu, Ni (2017). Research on the Linguistic Features of English Advertisements. Proceedings of International Conference on Innovations in Economic Management and Social Science, 29, 1234-1238.
Mamirova, D. Sh. (2020). Basic features of advertising language. Novateur Publications Journal, 6 (10), 325-330.
Moriarty, S., Mitchell, N. D., Wells, W. D. (2014). Advertising and IMC: Principles and Practice. Melbourne Australia: Pearson.
Mojseyenko, I. P. (1996). Pragmalingvisty`chna organizaciya reklamnogo tekstu: makro- i mikroanaliz (na materiali anglomovnoyi pobutovoyi reklamy`) [Pragmalinguistic organization of advertisement text: macro- and micro-analysis (a study of household advertising in English)]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, Kyiv State Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Olenyuk, O. (2016a). How Advertising Shapes Our Minds: Pragmatic and Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Languages for Specific Purposes, 3, 41-50.
Olenyuk, O. V. (2016b). Kognity`vno-dy`skursni xaraktery`sty`ky` vply`vu na adresata (na materiali anglomovnoyi zhurnal`noyi reklamy`) [Cognitive and discoursive properties of influencing an addressee (a study of journal advertisement in English)]. Unpublished candidate dissertation, Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Lviv, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Ovcharuk, T. V. (1999). Setevaja model’ konceptual’nyh metafor: oboznachenija ponjatija den’gi (na materiale sovremennogo anglijskogo jazyka) [Network model of conceptual metaphors: signifying the notion of money (a study of modern English data)]. Vіsnik Cherkas’kogo unіversitetu. Serіja Fіlologіchnі nauki, 12, 49-57 (in Russian).
Oxrimenko, V. I. (2002). Lingvokognity`vni ta pragmaty`chni aspekty` argumentaciyi v ispanomovnij reklami [Cognitive linguistic and pragmatic aspects of argumentation in Spanish-language advertising]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, T. G. Shevchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Pavkin, D. M. (2014). Anglojazychnaja reklama produktov pitanija: lingvokognitivnyj analiz [Food advertisement in English: a cognitive linguistic analysis]. Cognition, communication, discourse, 9, 86-107.
Samarina, V. V. (2010). Nimecz`komovny`j reklamny`j dy`skurs : pragmaty`chny`j, kognity`vny`j ta lingvosty`listy`chny`j aspekty` [German-language advertising discourse: pragmatic, cognitive, and linguistic aspects]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Sanjay .S, Dr. Z. Justin (2020). An overview of importance of English language in advertisement. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 7642-7644.
Soloshenko, O. D. (1990). Komunikaty`vno-pragmaty`chni aspekty` reklamnogo sloganu v mezhax modeli reklamnogo vply`vu (na materialax amery`kans`koyi pobutovoyi reklamy`) [Communicative-pragmatic aspects of advertisement slogan within the framework of advertising influence (a study of American household advertising)]. Unpublished candidate dissertation thesis, Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Lviv, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2012). Kognitivnoe kartirovanie kak lingvosemioticheskij faktor [Cognitive mapping as a liguo-semiotic factor]. In: A. N. Rudjakov (ed.) Funkcional’naja lingvistika: sb. nauchn. rabot [Functional linguistics: collection of research papers], 3, 79-182 (in Russian).
Zhabotinskaja, S. (2018). Generativizm, kognitivizm i semantika lingval’’nyh setej [Generativism, cognitivism, and semantics of lingual networks]. In: Doctrina multiplex, veritas una: A collection of studies commemorating the jubilee of I.R. Buniyatova (pp. 99–141). Kyiv: B. Hrinchenko University Publ.
Zhabotynska, S. A. (2019). Semanty`ka lingval`ny`x merezh u navchal`nomu kombinatornomu tezaurusi [Semantics of lingual networks in an educational combinatory thesaurus]. Studia Phililogica. Filologichni studiyi, 13, 17-27 (in Ukrainian). Retrieved from https://studiap.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/324/298
Zhabotynska, S. (2020). The active learner’s construction-combinatory thesaurues: user-driven principles of compiling (a cognitive linguistic approach). Cognition, communication, discourse, 21, 93-107.
