Reading riddles aright: a cognitive linguistic analysis of English and Ukrainian riddles

  • Dmytro Pavkin English Philology and Methods of English language teaching, the Bohdan Khmelmytsky National University of Cherkasy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9321-9591
Keywords: basic propositional schemas, conceptual image of the world, conceptual sphere, domain, referent of the riddle, riddle

Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the conceptual structure of English and Ukrainian riddles with the subsequent comparison of the empirical data under scrutiny. The relevance of the cognitive-linguistic vantage point adopted in the paper is determined by the fact that riddles constitute coal-and-ice elements of the linguistic image of the world which is a reflection of the ethnic conceptual image of the world. Thus, exposing the conceptual organization of riddles lays foundations for establishing unique features of the mindset of the English and Ukrainian peoples reflected in riddles in both languages. To reach the goal, I apply the methodology of conceptual analysis, namely the notions of conceptual sphere and domain introduced by cognitive linguists, as well as basic propositional schemas that feature in semantics of lingual networks. The research consists of two stages. At the first stage, I perform the modeling of the conceptual arrangement of objects the riddles refer to. The objects are found to fall within one of the two conceptual spheres (LIVING BEINGS and INANIMATE OBJECTS) that consist of three and six domains correspondingly. At the second stage, the characteristics of referents that are mentioned in the riddles serving as clues for guessing them are considered. These 25 characteristics are viewed as predicates of 11 basic propositional schemas. In conclusions, I draw a comparison between the riddles of the two languages. The similar features are attributed to the universals embedded in the conceptual image of the world symptomatic of all humans whereas the revealed differences pertain to idioethnic specificity of the two linguistic communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahams, R. D. (1972). The literary study of the riddle. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 14, 177–197.

Afanas’ev, A. N. (1995). Pojeticheskie vozzrenija slavjan na prirodu [Poetic views of Slavs on nature] (Vol. 1). Moskva: Sovremennyj pisatel’ Publ. (in Russian)

Akínyemí, A. (2015). Orature and Yorùbá Riddles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Baran, Ya. A. (1997). Frazeologiya u sy`stemi movy` [Phraseology in the system of language]. Ivano-Frankivs`k: Lileya-NV Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Ben Amos, D. (1976). Solutions to Riddles. Journal of American Folklore, 89, 249–254.

Berezovs`ky`j, I. P. (1962). Ukrayins`ki narodni zagadky` [Ukrainian folk riddles]. In Zagadky`. Seriya Ukrayins`ka narodna tvorchist` [Riddles. Ukrainian folklore] (pp. 3–7). Ky`yiv: AN URSR Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Brusencev, A. E. (2005). Ponimanie zagadko-poslovic v poznavatel’nom i komunikativnom kontekstah [Understanding riddles/ proverbs in the instructive and communicative contexts], Proc. of sci. conf. “Ponimanie v kommunikacii” (pp. 9–11). Moskva: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova Publ. (in Russian)

Buslaev, F. I. (2003). Narodnyj jepos i mifologija [Folk epic and mythology]. Moskva: Vysshaja shkola Publ. (in Russian)

Dudenko, O. V. (2002). Nominaty`vna ta komunikaty`vna pry`roda ukrayins`ky`x paremij (Avtoreferat kandydatskoi dysertatsii) [Nominative and communicative nature of Ukrainian paroemiae (Philology PhD thesis synopsis)]. Ky`yivs`ky`j nacional`ny`j universy`tet, Ky`yiv. (in Ukrainian)

Gacenko, I. O. (2018). Svoyeridnist` zagadky` yak zhanru fol`klornogo dy`skursu [Uniqueness of riddle as a genre of folk discourse]. Naukovi zapy`sky` Nacional`nogo universy`tetu «Ostroz`ka akademiya»: seriya «Filologiya» [Scientific notes of the National University “Ostrog Academy”: Philology series], 1(69), 1, 107–110. (in Ukrainian)

Guk, I. A. (2003). Metonimiya v anglijs`kij frazeologiyi: lingvokognity`vny`j analiz [Metonymy in English phraseology: a cognitive linguistic analysis], Proc. of sci. conf. “Treti Karazy`ns`ki chy`tannya” (pp. 143–145). Xarkiv: Konstanta Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Haritonchik, Z. A. (1992). Leksikologija anglijskogo jazyka [Lexicology of the English language]. Minsk: Vysshaja shkola Publ. (in Russian)

Kaivola-Bregenhøj, A. (2018). The riddle: Form and performance. Humanities, 7 (2), 49. Retrieved from https://www. researchgate.net/publication/325268276_The_Riddle_Form_and_Performance

Koval`s`ka, N. A. (2004). Paremiyi yak zasib vidobrazhennya kognity`vny`x procesiv [Paroemiae. as means of reflection of cognitive processes]. Visny`k L`vivs`kogo universy`tetu. Seriya Filologichni nauky` [Messenger of Lviv University. Series: Philological sciences], 34(1), 412–418. (in Ukrainian)

Maranda, E. K. (1971). Theory and practice of riddle analysis. Journal of American Folklore, 84, 51–61.

Mechkovskaja, A. V. (1998). Jazyk i religija: lekcii po filosofii i istorii religij [Language and religion: lectures on philosophy and history of religion]. Moskva: Fair Publ. (in Russian)

Mostovy`j, M. I. (1993). Leksy`kologiya anglijs`koyi movy` [Lexicology of the English language]. Xarkiv: Osnova Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Nikolaeva, T. M. (1994). Zagadka i poslovica: social’nye funkcii i grammatika [Riddle and proverb: social functions and grammar]. Issledovanija v oblasti balto-slavjanskoj duhovnoj kul’tury. Zagadka kak tekst [Research in the field of Baltic and Slavic spiritual culture. Riddle as a text]. Vol. 1 (pp. 143–177). Moskva: Indrik Publ. (in Russian)

Ony`shhenko, G. A. (2006). Movna struktura ukrayins`koyi narodnoyi zagadky` (semanty`chny`j i sy`ntaksy`chny`j aspekty`) (Avtoreferat kandydatskoi dysertatsii) [Linguistic structure of Ukrainian folk riddle (semantic and syntactic aspects (Philology PhD thesis synopsis)]. Dnipropetrovs`ky`j nacional`ny`j universy`tet, Dnipropetrovs`k. (in Ukrainian)

Panasenko, T. A. (2010). Komunikaty`vno-pragmaty`chny`j potencial zagadok u raznosy`stemny`x movax (Dy`s. kand. filol. nauk) [Communicative and pragmatic potential of riddles in languages with diverse systems (Philology PhD thesis)]. Pivdenooukrayins`ky`j nacional`ny`j pedagogichny`j universy`tet im. K. D. Ushy`ns`kogo, Odesa. (in Ukrainian)

Pavkin, D. (2020). A cognitive linguistic approach to the analysis of fantasy text characters. Cognition, communication, discourse, 20, 41–61.

Selivanova, O. O. (2004). Komunikaty`vni strategiyi i takty`ky` v ukrayins`ky`x zagadkax [Communicative strategies and tactics in Ukrainian riddles]. Visny`k Cherkas`kogo universy`tetu. Seriya Filologichni nauky` [Messenger of Cherkasy University. Series: Philological sciences], 60, 10–22. (in Ukrainian)

Sibirceva, V. G. (2002). Otrazhenie mirovosprijatija v zagadkah 30-90-h godov XX veka [Reflection of the worldview in riddles of the 1930s – 1990s]. In Problemy jazykovoj kartiny mira na sovremennom jetape [Contemporary problems of the linguistic image of the world] (pp. 82–85). Nizhnij Novgorod: Vektor Publ. (in Russian)

Zaxarova, N. V. (2009). Zagadka yak zakodovane znannya pro svit [Riddle as an encoded knowledge about the world]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional’nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Serija «Filologija» [Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Tauric national university], 21, 4(2), 252–256. (in Ukrainian)

Zaxarova, N. V. (2018). Strukturno-ty`pologichni osobly`vosti ukrayins`ky`x i nimecz`ky`x narodny`x zagadok [Structural and typological features of Ukrainian and German folk riddles]. Visny`k Mariupol`s`kogo derzhavnogo universy`tetu. Seriya: Filologiya [Messenger of Mariupol State University. Series: Philology, 17, 130–138. (in Ukrainian)

Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2004). Konceptual’nyj analiz jazyka: frejmovye seti [Conceptual analysis of language: frame networks]. Mova. Naukovo-teorety`chny`j chasopy`s z movoznavstva, 9: Problemy` pry`kladnoyi lingvisty`ky` [Language: scientific and theoretical journal in linguistics, 9, Problems of applied linguistics], 81–92. (in Russian)

Zhabotinskaja, S. A. (2018). Generativizm, kognitivizm i semantika lingval’nyh setej [Generativism, cognitivism, and semantics of lingual networks]. Doctrina multiplex, veritas una. Uchen` bagato, isty`na odna: zbirny`k pracz` do yuvileyu Izabelly` Rafayilivny` Buniyatovoyi [Schools are numerous, truth is only one: a collection of treatises commemorating the jubilee of Izabella Rafailivna Buniyatova], 99–141. (in Russian)

Zhabotynska, S. A. (2019). Semanty`ka lingval`ny`x merezh u navchal`nomu kombinatornomu tezaurusi [Semantics of lingual networks in an educational combinatory thesaurus]. Studia Phililogica. Filologichni studiyi, 13, 17–27. (in Ukrainian)

Zhurinskij, A. N. (1989). Semanticheskaja struktura zagadki: nemetaforicheskoe preobrazovanie smysla [Semantic structure of riddle: metaphoric transformation of meaning]. Moskva: Nauka. (in Russian)

Published
2022-07-27
How to Cite
Pavkin, D. (2022). Reading riddles aright: a cognitive linguistic analysis of English and Ukrainian riddles. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (95), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-5312-2022-95-03