Expressing Insult in English Authoritarian Discourse of Children (Gender Perspective)

Keywords: authoritarian addresser, discourse of children, implementing insult, invective, non-verbal, verbal

Abstract

The article focuses on verbal and nonverbal features of expressing insult in authoritarian discourse of children with account for the interlocutors’ gender and their fixed placement in each other’s zones of discursive surroundings. Insulting the addressee involves applying verbal and non-verbal cues to humiliate them and hurt their feelings, and is based on the aims of the child-addresser. To provide further validity of the results obtained, the author has selected communicative situations of implementing insult in dyads of children wherein both interlocutors find themselves in the horizontal dimension of interaction and try to construct the power hierarchy. Furthermore, the speakers’ gender has been taken into consideration; therefore, situations of same-sex and opposite-sex sibling and non-sibling communication are investigated. Dyads of sisters insult each other calling for the other’s withdrawal from the shared discursive space through the use of movement predicates and discourse markers of decreasing the importance of the addressee; the mixed groups tend to mirror the verbal and non-verbal repertoire of the authoritarian addresser; brothers implement insult via  low register vocabulary to express scorn for cowardice via sarcasm and invective vocabulary. The non-sibling cluster of girls expresses insult to jeopardize the relationship with the addressee by means of pretend condemnation of violating etiquette norms and a careless attitude towards their appearance through the use of various complex argumented syntactic constructions and does not resort to lowering the register; the mixed dyadic pairs typically refer to the addressee’s intellectual skills or age in an offensive manner via pejorative vocatives of olfactory nature and zoonyms; the subgroups of boys implement insult via introducing invective means on the verbal and non-verbal levels. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

and Holding (2005). Retrieved from https://www.dailyscript.com/scripts/12+and+// Holding.pdf.

Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bartasheva, A. I. (2004). Vzaimodejstvie neverbal'nih i verbal'nyh komponentov situacii kommunikativnogo dominirovanija v anglojazychnom diskurse. (Diss. kand. filol. nauk) [Interaction of nonverbal and verbal components of the situation of communicative dominance in the English language discourse (Philology PhD thesis)]. Har'kovskij nacional'nyj universitet imeni V. N. Karazina, Har'kov. (in Russian)

Blakar, R. M. (1979). Language as a means of social power. Theoretical-empirical explorations of language and language use as embedded in a social matrix. In J. L. Mey (Ed.), Pragmalinguistics, theory and practice. (pp. 131–169). The Hague: Mouton.

Danjushina, L. A. (2013). Gendernye stereotipy v detskom diskurse [Gender stereotypes in child discourse]. Jazyk. Tekst. Diskurs [Language. Text. Discourse], 11, 206–210. (in Russian)

Dejk, T. A. Van. (2013). Diskurs i vlast': Reprezentacija dominirovanija v jazyke i kommunikacii [Discourse and power: Representation of dominance in language and communication]. Moskva: Librokom. (in Russian)

Grebenshhikova, T. A., & Zachesova, I. A. (2011). Realizacija otnoshenij dominirovanija podchinenija mezhdu chlenami sem'i v povsednevnom diskurse [The pursuance of dominance-submissive relationships among family members in family discourse]. Jeksperimental'naja psihologija [Experimental psychology], 4(4), 74–87. (in Russian)

Kostogladova, L. P. (2008). Jemocional'naja storona rechi v dinamike detskogo diskursa [The emotional aspect of speech in the dynamics of children’s discourse]. Zhanry i tipy teksta v nauchnom i medijnom diskurse [Genres and types of text in scientific and media discourse], 6, 79–83. (in Russian)

Kramer, Dzh., & Olsted, D. (2002). Maski avtoritarnosti: Ocherki o guru [The guru papers: Masks of authoritarian power]. Moskva: Progress-Tradicija. (in Russian)

Kriuchkova, P. H. (2003). Avtorytarnyj dyskurs (na materiali suchasnoi anhlijs'koi movy) (Dys. kand. filol. nauk) [Authoritarian discourse (on the material of the English language) (Philology PhD thesis)]. Kyivs'kyj natsional'nyj universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

Kusov, G. V. (2004). Oskorblenie kak illokutivnyj lingvokul'turnyj koncept. (Diss. kand. filol. nauk). [Insult as an illocutionary linguocultural concept (Philology PhD thesis)]. Kubanskij gosudarstvennyj tehnologicheskij universitet, Krasnodar. (in Russian)

Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and interaction among children and co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual review of anthropology, 3, 625–649. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144008

Kyratzis, A., & Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Language socialization in children’s peer and sibling kin group interactions. In P. Duff, & S. May (Eds.), Language socialization, encyclopedia of language and socialization. (pp. 1–16). Cham: Springer.

Leto, Ja.–A. V. (2020). Vyrazhenie kommunikativnoj agressii posredstvom taktiki «oskorblenie» (na materiale vyskazyvanij Donal'da Trampa) [Expression of communicative aggression through the tactic of “Insult” (On the material of Donald Trump’s statements)]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta [Bashkir state university synopsis], 25(1), 187–194. DOI:10.33184/bulletin-bsu-2020.1.30. (in Russian)

McDonald, M. (2010). Judy Moody Gets Famous. Somerville: Candlewick Press.

Pakharenko, A. V. (2020). Dytyna iak avtorytarna dyskursyvna osobystist' na materiali suchasnoi anhlijs'koi movy). (Dys. kand. filol. nauk). [Child as an authoritarian discursive personality (based on the modern English language) (Philology PhD thesis]. Kharkivs'kyj natsional'nyj universytet imeni V. N. Karazina, Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian)

Pitcher, A. (2011). My Sister Lives on the Mantelpiece. London: Orion Children’s Books.

Pushkin, A. A. (2014). Direktivno-avtoritarnyj diskurs v krosskul'turnom prostranstve [Directive-authoritarian discourse in cross-cultural space]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice], 7(37), (T. 2), 172–174. (in Russian)

Reitman, D., & Villa, M. (2004). Verbal aggression: Coping strategies of children. Retrieved from https://cobbsuccessforall.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Verbal-Aggression.html#// :~:text=Verbal%20aggression%20is%20similar%20to,methods%20of%20intimidation%20and%20harassment.

Soloschuk, L. V. (2006). Verbal'ni i neverbal'ni komponenty komunikatsii v anhlomovnomu dyskursi [Verbal and non-verbal components of communication in the English discourse]. Kharkiv: Konstanta. (in Ukrainian)

Sternin, I. A., Antonova, L. G., Karpov, D. L., & Shamanova, M. V. (2013). Vyjavlenie priznakov unizhenija chesti, dostoinstva, umalenija delovoj reputacii i oskorblenija v lingvisticheskoj jekspertize teksta [Feature detection of humiliation, damaging business reputation in the linguistic expertise of text]. Jaroslavl': Jaroslavskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. P. G. Demidova. (in Russian)

Vagner, K. A. (2018). Detskaja rechevaja agressija kak sposob vyrazhenija otricatel'nyh jemocij v nemeckojazychnoj kommunikacii [Children’s speech aggression as a way of expressing negative emotions in German-speaking communication], Proc. of the int. sci. conf. “Problemy ontolingvistiki – 2018” March 20–23. (pp. 393–397). Sankt-Peterburg: RGPU im. A. I. Gercena. (in Russian)

Vasiutyns'kyj, V. (2005). Interaktsijna psykholohiia vlady [Interactional psychology of power]. Kyiv: KSU. (in Ukrainian)

Virotchenko, S. (2017). Conceptualization of motion in communicative space in English. Lege

artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in

Trnava, 2(2), 392–444. https://DOI:10.1515/lart-2017-0020 ISSN 2453-8035

Wilson, J. (2000). The Illustrated Mum. Reading: Corgie Yearling.

Wilson, J. (2005). Best Friends. London: Corgie Yearling.

Zvierieva, O. H. (2014). Komunikatyvni stratehii siblinhiv v anhlomovnomu simejnomu dyskursi. (Dys. kand. filol. nauk) [Siblings’ communicative strategies in the English family discourse (Philology PhD thesis)]. Kharkivs'kyj natsional'nyj universytet imeni V. N. Karazina, Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian)

Published
2021-09-13
How to Cite
Pakharenko , A. (2021). Expressing Insult in English Authoritarian Discourse of Children (Gender Perspective). The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (93), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2021-93-01