Category of intentionality in carnivalized media space (a case study of American TV show ‘Saturday Night Live’)
Abstract
This article is a study of instantiation of linguistic category of intentionality in carnivalized media space. The concept of modern media space is analyzed in the aspect of its carnivalization. An analysis of manifestations of the category of intentionality in modern American humorous TV show 'Saturday Night Live' is carried out. We understand media space as a variety of communicative space that covers several environments that shape new conditions of modern life (technosphere, infosphere, socioinfosphere). Modern media space includes carnivalization processes which constitute the carnival-masquerade environment characteristic of it. Information flows in the media space are directed at the addressee: they contain the basic intention to influence them, and this impact is large-scale because it reaches a wide audience. We treat intention as an element of the category of intentionality instantiated in carnivalized media space. It is also a communicative intention of the speaker, which may differ from their real intentions. The addressee can recognize the true intention of the addressee; it depends on the theme of discourse and the type of communicative situation, the psychological state and general awareness of the recipient. We consider macro-intention (entertaining) as the main purpose of the show, which determines stylistic and genre characteristics of the message, and micro-intention – local aims of utterances. We single out the following micro-intentions: negative assessment of intellectual abilities, an attempt to get closer to the audience, an attempt of self-justification, demonstration of the audience's stance, demonstration of personal attitude, attempt to damage the image, an attempt to avoid response. This analysis is an attempt to study instantiations of the category of intentionality in the carnivalized media space by identifying its key elements – macro- and micro intentions, which are characteristic of single episodes of the TV show, throwing light on the images of major political figures of the United States.
Downloads
References
/References
Antonova, Yu. N. (2006). Intencija govorjashhego v aspekte kommunikativno-celevoj semantiki. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Speaker’s intention in the aspect of communicative-target semantics. Cand. philol. sci. diss. synopsis]. Orel. (in Russian)
Arutiunova, N. D. (1999). Jazyk i mir cheloveka [Human language and world]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russian)
Holovanova, N. V. (2017). Mediaprostir yak vazhlyvyi chynnyk pobudovy informatsiinoho suspilstva [Media space as an important factor in building an information society]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1, 27–35 (in Ukrainian)
Hrytsai, S. (2012). Vyznachennia poniattia “media prostir” z pozytsii mizhdystsyplinarnoho pidkhodu [Defining the concept of ‘media space’ from the perspective of multidisciplinary approach]. Visnyk Kharkivskoi derzhavnoi akademii kultury, 36, 235–243 (in Ukrainian)
Duskaeva, L. R. (2014). Intentcionalnost i modalizatciia mediateksta v kontekste kultury [Intentionality and modalization of text in the aspect of culture]. Politicheskaia lingvistika, 3(49), 51–57 (in Russian)
Duskaeva, L. R. (2012). Intentcionalnost rechevoi deiatelnosti zhurnalista: ontologiia i struktura [Intentionality of a journalist’s speech activity: anthology and structure]. Vestn. SPbGU, 9(2), 253–260 (in Russian)
Zaiukova, E. V. (2005). Semantika i pragmatika intentcionalnosti v iazykovoi aktualizatcii (na materiale angliiskogo iazyka). Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Semantics and pragmatics of intentionality in language actualization (based on the English language). Cand. philol. sci. diss. synopsis]. Barnaul (in Russian)
Zubanova, L. B. (2008). Sovremennoe mediaprostranstvo: podkhody k issledovaniiu i printcipy interpretatcii [Modern media space: approaches to research and principles of interpretation]. Vestnik kultury i iskusstv, 2(14), 6–17 (in Russian)
Kobozeva, I. M. (2003). Intentcionalnyi i kognitivnyi aspekty smysla vyskazyvaniia. Diss. dokt. filol. nauk (v forme doklada) [Intentional and cognitive aspects of the meaning of utterance. Dr. philol. sci. diss (in the form of a report)]. Moscow. 92 p. (in Russian)
Kolesova, D.V. (2009). Intentciia kak bazovaia kategoriia tekstovoi deiatelnosti [Intention as a basic category of textual activity]. Mir russkogo slova, 3, 28–31 (in Russian)
Moshcheva, S. V. (2011). Rechevaia intentciia: teoreticheskie podkhody k issledovaniiu [Speech intention: theoretical approaches to research]. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2(3), 223–226 (in Russian)
Ostin, Dzh. (1986). Slovo kak deistvie [Word as an act]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Moscow : Progress, pp. 22–130.
Prikhodko, O. N. (2012). Intentcionalnost deiatelnosti individa [Intentionality of the individual’s actvity]. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniia, 5, 261–263 (in Russian)
Samokhina, V. O. (2017). Dialohizm u mezhakh karnavalnoi refleksii [Dialogism within the framework of carnival reflection]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia ‘Linhvistyka’, Kherson, 30, 83–90 (in Ukrainian)
Serl, Dzh. R. (2004). Ratcionalnost v deistvii [Rationality in action]. M. : ProgressTraditciia.
Frege, G. (1997). Smysl i znachenie. Izbrannye raboty [Sense and meaning. Selected works].
Dennett, D. C. (1982). How to Study Human Consciousness Empirically or Nothing Comes to Mind. Synthese. V. 53. №2.
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistics semantics: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 376 p.
Saturday Night Live. YouTube. URL: https://www.youtube.com/user/SaturdayNightLive.
Антонова Ю. Н. Интенция говорящего в аспекте коммуникативно-целевой семантики: автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук : 10.02.19. Орел, 2006. 22 с.
Арутюнова Н. Д. Язык и мир человека. М. : Наука, 1999. 896 с.
Голованова Н. В. Медіапростір як важливий чинник побудови інформаційного суспільства. Актуальні проблеми державного управління. 2017. № 1. С. 27–35.
Грицай С. Визначення поняття “медіа простір” з позицій міждисциплінарного підходу. Вісник Харківської державної академії культури. 2012. Вип. 36. С. 235–243.
Дускаева Л. Р. Интенциональность и модализация медиатекста в контексте культуры. Политическая лингвистика. 2014. № 3 (49). С. 51–57.
Дускаева Л. Р. Интенциональность речевой деятельности журналиста: oнтология и структура. Вестн. СПбГУ. Сер. 9. 2012. Вып. 2. С. 253–260.
Заюкова Е. В. Семантика и прагматика интенциональности в языковой актуализации (на материале английского языка): автореферат дис. … канд. филол. наук : 10.02.04. Барнаул, 2005. 20 с.
Зубанова Л. Б. Современное медиапространство: подходы к исследованию и принципы интерпретации. Вестник культуры и искусств. 2008. №.2 (14). C. 6–17.
Кобозева И. М. Интенциональный и когнитивный аспекты смысла высказывания: дис. … д-ра филол. наук (в форме доклада): 10.02.19. Москва, 2003. 92 с.
Колесова Д. В. Интенция как базовая категория текстовой деятельности. Мир русского слова. 2009. № 3. С. 28–31.
Мощева С. В. Речевая интенция: теоретические подходы к исследованию. Известия высших учебных заведений. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2011. Т. 2. № 3. С.223–226.
Остин Дж. Слово как действие Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. М. : Прогресс, 1986. Вып.17. С. 22–130.
Приходько О. Н. Интенциональность деятельности индивида. Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2012. №5. С. 261–263.
Самохіна В. О. Діалогізм у межах карнавальної рефлексії. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія «Лінгвістика». 2017. Вип. 30. С. 83–90.
Серль Дж. P. Рациональность в действии. М. : ПрогрессТрадиция, 2004. 336 с.
Фреге Г. Смысл и значение. Избранные работы. М., 1997.
Dennett D. C. How to Study Human Consciousness Empirically or Nothing Comes to Mind. Synthese. V. 53. №2. November 1982.
Lyons J. Linguistics semantics: an introduction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1995. 376 p.
Saturday Night Live. YouTube. URL: https://www.youtube.com/user/SaturdayNightLive.