Metaphor as the means of creating the political leader image in the German media discourse

Keywords: discourse, image politics, media discourse, metaphor, metaphorical models, political communication

Abstract

The specification of the metaphorical models as the means of formation of the political leader image in the modern German media discourse, comprises the objective of the research. The metaphor serves as the reflection of the continuous processes and the establishment of the individual global picture, and image construction in particular. The image of a modern political leader is presented as a complex psychosocial phenomenon as well as a linguo-cognitive phenomenon that has occurred due to an impact of a certain culture. In our research, we have analyzed 120 examples of conventional metaphors that have been employed in the formation of the political image. The results confirm that the following conventional metaphorical domains are utilized in order to form the political image: anthropomorphic domain (ORGANISM, DISEASE, AND FAREWELL), artifactual domain, social occurrence domain (THEATER, STRUGGLE), organic domain (NATURAL PHENOMENA). The encountered metaphorical models are represented via the basic model formula X → (Y2) + Y + Y1 as well as the sub-model formula X → (Y2) + (Y + Y1). The majority of metaphorical models are connotatively ambivalent and may be employed in order to form a positive image and a negative one alike. The lion’s share of the analyzed metaphors assembles the associative field containing a positive evaluation of A. Merkel and a negative evaluation of her opponents. The metaphorical transference is unsuccessful in case the receiver fails to identify the donor sphere due to the lack of background knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Арутюнова Н.Д. Метафора и дискурс. Вступительная статья. Теория метафоры. Москва, 1990. С. 3–20.

Баранов А.Н. Метафоры в политическом дискурсе: языковые маркеры кризисности политической ситуации. Вопросы языкознания. 2012. № 2. С. 73–94.

Баранов А.Н. Дескрипторная теория метафоры. Москва, 2014. 632 с.

Будаев Э.В., Чудинов А.П. Современная политическая лингвистика. Екатеринбург, 2006. 252 с.

Безугла Л.Р., Романченко І.О. Лінгвопрагматика дискримінації у публіцистичному дискурсі. Харків, 2013. 182 с.

Бондаренко Е.В., Мартынюк А.П., Фролова И.Е., Шевченко И.С. Как нарисовать портрет птицы: методология когнитивно-коммуникативного анализа языка. Харьков, 2017. 246 с.

Карасик В.И. Язык социального статуса. Москва, 2002. 333 с.

Пірог І.І. ЛОГІКА VS. ЕМОЦІЇ: концептуалізація аргументації у німецькому медіадискурсі. Концепти і контрасти. Одесса, 2017. С. 355–362.

Пірог І.І., Ізотова Л.І. Сучасний німецький медіадискурс та його диференційні ознаки. Когнітивно-прагматичні дослідження професійних дискурсів: матеріали VI наук. конф. з між нар. участю (Харків, 17 бер. 2018). Харків, 2018. С. 80–85.

Пономарева О.А. Вербализация политического имиджа в российских и американских средствах массовой информации: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Волгоград, 2008. 215 с.

Почепцов Г.Г. Имиджелогия. Москва, 2006. 576 с.

Стоянова Е.В. Метафора сквозь призму лингвокультурной ситуации. Шумен, 2013. 276 с.

Шейгал Е. И. Семиотика политического дискурса. Волгоград, 2004. 368 с.

Chilton P. Security Metaphors, Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. London, 1997. 465 p.

Chudinov A.P., Solopova O.A. Linguistic political prognostics: models and scenarios of future. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. P. 412–417.

Dijk T. van. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society. 1993. Vol. 4 (2). P. 249–283.

Kövečses Z. Metaphorand emotion. Language, culture, and body in humanfeeling. Cambridge, 2000. 223 p.

Kövečses Z. Metaphor:A Practical Introduction in Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford, New York, 2002. 304 p.

Lakoff G. The Contemporary Theory ofMetaphor . Cambridge, 1993. P. 202–251.

Lakoff G., Johnson М. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, 1980. 242 p.

Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, 1987. 614 p.

Musolff A. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke, 2004. 224 p.

Wodak R. Sprache in der Politik. Politik in der Sprache. Klagenfuhrt, 2005. Vol. № 2. S.135-1532.

Published
2019-02-16
How to Cite
Пірог, І. І., & Ізотова, Л. І. (2019). Metaphor as the means of creating the political leader image in the German media discourse. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (88), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2018-88-04