FEATURES OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN SWITZERLAND: POLITICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

Keywords: direct democracy, instruments of direct democracy, political responsibility, political culture and consciousness, political communication, referendum, people's initiative, bill

Abstract

The tools of realization of direct democracy in Switzerland are considered. The Swiss political system, levels of government and distribution of powers between institutions are analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the fact that direct democracy allows the population to directly influence important decisions at all levels. Swiss citizens have the opportunity to vote on their own through a popular initiative and a referendum, which is optional and mandatory. The historical principles of development of instruments of direct democracy are considered.

Assumptions are made about possible risks and shortcomings in the process of implementing direct democracy. The point is that extreme right-wing forces may abuse the instruments of democracy to amend existing legislation. The goal is to promote politicians' own interests. With the help of political technologies, in particular the use of populist slogans, inaccurate statistics and false facts, the leaders of radical parties manipulate the opinion of citizens, inciting them to put forward certain projects to national referendums. The assumption is substantiated that the vote of citizens can lead to the tyranny of the majority. Legislation and responsibility of citizens minimize the risk of such a scenario.

The political and legal bases for the use of direct democracy in Switzerland are analyzed.

Comparing the advantages and risks of decision-making with such a system, it is concluded that it is optimal for today. The focus of Switzerland's direct democracy is a compromise dialogue between citizens and the authorities.

The draft law «On Local Referendum» № 5512 was considered. Its purpose is to return to the citizens of Ukraine the constitutional right to independently resolve issues of local significance by the territorial community by direct vote. Suggestions for improving the content of this bill have been formulated. We are talking about: the expediency of dividing referendums into types; analysis of the percentage of turnout when considering issues of local importance, increasing the number of questions for voting, etc. It is noted that in order to successfully use the Swiss experience in Ukrainian society, these proposals require broad discussion with the involvement of political scientists and lawyers, awareness of their own responsibility to politicians and the public.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Svitlana Denysiuk, Vinnytsia National Technical University, Khmelnytske Shosse St., 95, Vinnytsia, 21000, Ukraine

Professor, doctor of political sciences, Professor of the Department of Social and Political Sciences.

References

Almond, G. A., Verba S. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Burdyak, V. I., Rotar, N. Yu. 2004. Political culture of the European countries in the context of integrative processes: monograph. Chernivtsi: Ruta.

Golovakha, Y., Gorbachyk, A. 2008. Social change in Ukraine and Europe: following the results of the European Social Achievement 2005–2007. Kiev: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. URL: https://i-soc.com.ua/assets/files/library/european_social_survey_57_ua.pdf.

Politic system. 2021. URL: https://www.eda.admin.ch/aboutswitzerland/ru/home/politik-geschichte/politisches-system.html

Kaufmann, Bruno. 2019. The Way to Modern Direct Democracy in Switzerland, House of Switzerland. URL: https://www.houseofswitzerland.org/swissstories/history/way-modern-direct-democracy-switzerland

Altma, D. 2014. Strengthening Democratic Quality: Reactive Deliberation in the Context of Direct Democracy, Kellogg Institute for International Studies.

Braіlovska, K. 2019. 150 fates of direct democracy in Switzerland, or should we collect 50,000 signatures in a hundred days?, Analytical center ADASTRA. URL: https://adastra.org.ua/blog/150-rokiv-pryamoyi-demokratiyi-u-shvejcariyi-abo-navisho-zbirati-50-000-pidpisiv-za-sto-dniv

Moeckli, Daniel. 2018. Referendums: Tyranny of the majority?, Swiss Political Science Review = Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 24(3): 335-341 URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12317

Madison, J. 2009a. The Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 10. In: Genovese, M.A. (ed.) New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 49–54.

Madison, J. 2009b. The Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 51. In: Genovese, M.A. (ed.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 119–122.

Chambers, S. 2018. Making Referendums Safe for Democracy: A Call for More and Better Deliberation, Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 305–311. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12321

Landemore, H. 2018. Referendums Are Never Merely Referendums: On the Need to Make Popular Vote Processes More Deliberative, Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 320–327. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12314

Swiss cultural policy and pro Нelvetia foundation. 2019. Ukrainian Cultural Fund. URL: https://uaculture.org/texts/kulturna-polityka-shvejczariyi-ta-fond-pro-helvetia/

Draft Law on Local Referendum. № 5512 від 19.05.2021. URL: https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/26620

Published
2022-07-15
How to Cite
Denysiuk, S. (2022). FEATURES OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN SWITZERLAND: POLITICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 41, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2022-41-06