PERVERSIONS OF POLITICAL REGIMES IN THE CONDITIONS OF INHIBITION OF GLOBALIZATION AND DEDEMOCRATIZATION
Abstract
Changes of geopolitical centers under the conditions of modern geopolitical turbulence and processes of fragmentation of the world political order are considered. It is noted that the pandemic has intensified the process of closing state borders. In the context of the crisis of the established institutions of liberal democracy, the emergence of post-democracy as a phenomenon and process of evolution of «exemplary» democracies became a clear proof of this crisis. It has been established that this results in the perversion of the political regimes of the "new democracies", the post-Soviet space in particular. The uneven economic development of the post-Soviet countries has increased and the differences between these countries in terms of attitudes to various geopolitical projects have increased. It is noted that the political regimes of the "new democracies" have become regimes of competitive oligarchy and neo-patrimonialism, the influence of certain oligarchic groups and their representatives has increased. This gave them more opportunities to dominate the hierarchy of power and overcome existing institutional constraints, which ultimately created the conditions for the creation of pseudo-democratic regimes. Important features of pseudo-democracies that allow oligarchic groups and authoritarian rulers of official political institutions in post-Soviet pseudo-democracies to exercise control over the prevalence of patronage policy are highlighted.
It turns out that gradual democratization occurs every time rivals of pseudo-democratic leaders come to power through democratic elections, that pseudo-democratic leaders are authoritarian leaders, abuse state resources to deprive the opposition of access to these important resources. Such perversions preclude any possibility of creating a level playing field for democratic political competition that allows the opposition to win the election.
Downloads
References
Murillo, Maria Victoria & Levitsky, Steven. 2014. Building Institutions on Weak Foundations: Lessons from Latin America. In: Brinks, Daniel, Leiras, Marcelo & Mainwaring, Scott (eds.) et al., Reflections on uneven democracies : the legacy of Guillermo O'Donnell, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2004. “Divided They Rule: The Management and Manipulation of Political Opposition”, Comparative Politics vol.36(2): 159-179.
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2005. Structuring conflict in the Arab world: incumbents, opponents, and institutions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hale, Henry E. 2005, “Regime cycles: democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia”, World Politics vol.58(01): 133-165.
Hale, Henry E. 2010. “Eurasian polities as hybrid regimes: The case of Putin's Russia”, Journal of Eurasian Studies vol.1(1): 33-41.
Hale, Henry E. 2016. “Caucasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective”, Taiwan Journal of Democracy vol.12(1): 71-92.
Diamond, Larry. 1996. “Is the third wave over?”, Journal of democracy vol.7(3): 20-37.
Diamond, Larry.2002. “Thinking about hybrid regimes”, Journal of democracy vol.13(2): 21-35.
Zakaria, Fareed.1997. “The rise of illiberal democracy”, Foreign affairs 22-43.
Schedler, Andreas. 2015. Electoral Authoritarianism. In: Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gandhi, Jennifer & Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats”, Comparative political studies vol.40(11): 1279-1301.
Svolik, Milan W. (2012), The politics of authoritarian rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cassani, Andrea. 2014. “Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes”, International Political Science Review vol.35(5): 542-558.
Levitsky, Steven & Way, Lucan A. 2010, “Why democracy needs a level playing field”, Journal of Democracy vol.21(1): 57-68.
Babajan, Tigran. 2018. “Oligarchs, State Power and Mass Opinion – A Study of the Role of Oligarchs in Post-Soviet Pseudo-democracies”, Linnaeus University Dissertations. No 313. URL: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/ diva2:1186695/FULLTEXT01.pdfemocracies,
Przeworski, Adam (2015), “Acquiring the Habit of Changing Governments Through Elections”, Comparative Political Studies, vol.48, (1): 101-129.
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).