THE PROBLEM OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE MACROHISTORICAL POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE

Keywords: world-system analysis; war-taxation theory of the state; political Marxism; sovereignty; nation state; capitalism

Abstract

The article analyzes the macrohistorical perspective of the study of sovereignty in the framework of political theory represented by a world-system analysis, the war-taxation theory of the state and political Marxism. The relevance of the approach proposed by macro-political theories for studying the current state of sovereignty is considered. The theoretical prerequisites for the formation of these theories are investigated, which were caused by the search for fundamentally new approaches in the 1970s. in analysis of modern political and state institutions, attention is focused on the influence of the creative heritage of M. Weber in the process of conceptualization of macrohistorical political theories. The basic theoretical approaches of world-system analysis (I. Wallerstein, J. Arrigi), the war-taxation theory of the state (Ch. Tilly, W. McNeill, M. Mann) and political Marxism (R. Brenner, P. Anderson, B. Teschke) to the process of formation and development of states during the Modern era are analyzed. In this article the problem of sovereignty is examined through an analysis of the prerequisites for the formation of basic state institutions in a historical perspective, which is the main approach of macrohistorical political theories. It is revealed that, despite the differences in approaches, the world-system analysis and the war-taxation theory of the state can be compared as the external and internal contours of the sovereignty problems in the historical process of the formation and development of European states during the Modern era, special attention is paid to the role of economically determined social transformations of Modern era in the framework of the theoretical approach that is offered by political Marxism. The similarities are noted in the approaches of the analyzed theories to the process of formation of modern type of states, which are specified in the following positions: modern type of states as a unique phenomenon in Western Europe, the special role of capitalism in the process of socio-political and economic transformations of Modern era, a successful configuration of factors in the historical process that led to the emergence nation state, achieving a balance between the interests of diverse groups, structural socio-political and economic changes as a response to external and internal challenges, the interdisciplinary nature of theories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

О. С. Гайко

Assistant professor in Political Science, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

Вебер, М. 2012. Господарство і суспільство. К.: Вид. дім «Всесвіт».

Бродель, Ф. 1995. Матеріальна цивілізація, економіка і капіталізм, XV – XVIII ст. У 3-х т. Том 1. Структури повсякденності: можливе й неможливе. К.: Основи.

Валлерстайн, И. 2015. Мир-система Модерна. Том І. Капиталистическое сельское хозяйство и истоки европейского мир-экономики в XVI веке. М.: Русский фонд содействия образованию и науке.

Арриги, Д. 2006. Долгий двадцатый век. Деньги, власть и истоки нашего времени. М.: Издательский дом Территория будущего.

Гайко, О. 2014. “Трансформація сучасної капіталістичної системи”, Вісник ХНУ імені В. Н. Каразіна. Сер. Питання політології. 27: 114-119.

Тилли, Ч. 2009. Принуждение, капитал и европейские государства. 990 – 1992 гг. М.: Издательский дом Территория будущего.

Мак-Нил, У. 2008. В погоне за мощью. Технология, вооруженная сила и общество в ХІ – ХХ веках. М.: Издательский дом Территория будущего.

Brenner, R. 1977. “The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism”. New Left Review, 104: 25-92.

Андерсон, П. 2010. Родословная абсолютистс-кого государства. М.: Издательский дом Терри-тория будущего.

Тешке, Б. 2011. Миф о 1648 годе: класс, геополитика и создание современных междуна-родных отношений. М.: Изд. дом. Гос. ун-та – Высшей школы экономики.

REFERENCE

Weber, M. 2012. Economy and Society. K.: Publishing House «Vsesvit» (in Ukrainian)

Braudel, F. 1995. Material civilization, economy and capitalism, XV – XVIII st. 3 volumes. Vol. 1. Structures of everyday life: possible and impossible. K.: Osnovy (in Ukrainian)

Wallerstein, I. 2015. Modern World-System, vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the XVI Century. M.: Russian Foundation for the Promotion of Education and Science (in Russian)

Arrighi, G. 2006. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times.M.: Publishing House "Territoria budushchego".(in Russian)

Gaiko, O. 2014.Transformation of the modern capitalist system.Visnyk KHNU imeni V.N. Karazina. Series «Pytannya politolohiyi», Issue 27: 114-119.(in Ukrainian)

Tilly, Ch. 2009. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. M.: Publishing House "Territoria budushchego".(in Russian)

McNeill, W. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society in the 11th – 20th centuries.M.: Publishing House "Territoria budushchego" (in Russian)

Brenner, R. 1977. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review, 104: 25-92.

Anderson, P. 2010. The Genealogy of an Absolutist State.M.: Publishing House "Territoria budushchego". (in Russian)

Teschke, B. 2011. The myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and Marking of Modern International Relations. M.: University press – Higher School of Economics (in Russian)

Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
Гайко, О. С. (2019). THE PROBLEM OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE MACROHISTORICAL POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 35, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2019-35-01