English abbreviations in the field of education: thematic classification and teaching methods

Keywords: classification, English abbreviations, foreign language teaching, improving reading skills, thematic groups

Abstract

The professional training of future foreign language teachers and translators requires a command of the terminology of the relevant field, including its abbreviated forms. Drawing on similar studies classifying Ukrainian and foreign-language terms across various fields, the author notes a lack of research dedicated to English-language abbreviations. Together with the need for their systematic structural and thematic classification, this has led to the relevance of this study, the aim of which is to identify thematic groups and sub-groups and to determine their structural features. The tasks include selecting material, grouping it into thematic categories, and providing recommendations for teaching abbreviations. English-language terminology, as a coherent system, is formed on the basis of shared conceptual characteristics and unites lexical units according to their extra-linguistic features. Its study involves organising terms by dividing them into thematic groups and sub-groups. The basis for such a division is the denotative feature, i.e. the correlation of terms with phenomena and objects of real life. This article examines the problem of systematising 100 English abbreviations, selected from original English sources, on the basis of three semantic categories: ʼstudents, pupils and their levels of foreign language proficiencyʼ, ʼlanguage as the object of study or researchʼ, and ʼconditions of learning and teachingʼ. According to the results of the analysis, the thematic groups of English abbreviations formed are characterised by hierarchy (centre and periphery), variability in terms of branching, composition of components, structure, part of speech, and methods of terminological formation. The common conceptual features of the components across all thematic groups ensure their thematic coherence, logical consistency and clarity. The consistent and systematic study of abbreviations during the process of learning English contributes to the development and improvement of reading skills and to raising the overall level of foreign language proficiency. Further research should focus on clarifying the structural organisation and word-formation patterns of English-language abbreviations, analysing strategies for their accurate rendering into Ukrainian, and identifying effective methodological approaches to their mastery and appropriate use in foreign-language speech during the training of future teachers and translators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borodina, N.S. (2013). Main classification lines in the Ukrainian linguodidactics terminology. Terminological Bulletin. Kyiv, 2(1), pp. 145-149. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/51267 [Accessed 20 Okt. 2025] [in Ukrainian].

Herasimova, O.M. (2016). Peculiarities of terms translation (on the example of the border discourse). Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Ser. Philologia, 22, pp. 180-182 [in Ukrainian].

Kovalchuk, N. (2025). Structural classification of English abbreviations for forms of assessment and names of diplomas and certificates related to language teaching. Teaching languages at higher educational establishments at the present stage. Intersubject relations. 46, p. 22-38 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.26565/2073-4379-2025-46-02

Lepekha, T.V. (2000). Lexico Semantic and Word Formation Structural Features of Forensic Medical Terminology. PhD theses. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].

Khalinovska, L.A. (2009). Thematic groups for the designation of names of aircraft in Ukrainian. Ukrainian terminology and modernity: a collection of scientific works. Pp. 176-179 [in Ukrainian].

Kharchuk, L.V. (2013). Thematic classification of Ukrainian electric power terms. Terminological Bulletin. Kyiv: Instytut ukrainskoi movy NANU, 2(2), pp. 72-77. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/ 51291 [Accessed 20 Oct. 2025] [in Ukrainian].

Chernovaty, L.M., Kovalchuk, N.M. (2020). Thematic classification of English abbreviations of the names of organisations in the field of language teaching. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Romance and Germanic Philology. Methods of teaching foreign languages. 91, pp. 198-204 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2020-91-21

Chernovaty, L.M., Kovalchuk, N.M. (2021). Thematic classification of English abbreviations of the names of approaches to language teaching and forms of its organisation. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of teaching foreign languages. 92, pp. 129-137. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877- 2020-92-18 [in Ukrainian].

Chernovaty, L.M., Kovalchuk, N.M. (2021). Thematic classification of English abbreviations of the names of forms of control, diplomas and certificates in language teaching. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of teaching foreign languages. 94, pp. 87-95 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2021- 94-13

Shmatko, I.V. (2015). Features of the systematic organisation of Ukrainian beekeeping terms by thematic and lexical-semantic groups. Terminological Bulletin. Kyiv, 3(2), pp. 198-210 [in Ukrainian].

Acronyms Related to TESL. Internet TESL Journal. Available at: http://www.Iteslj.org > acronyms (last accessed 24 Apr. 2024).

Belda, J.R. (2004). Translating Computer Abbreviations from English into Spanish: Main Types and Problems. Meta. 49(4), pp. 920-929.

Collins, T. (2018). Teaching Abbreviations and Abbreviated Words. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0793

Gehenot, D. (1975). Le sigle, aperçu linguistque. Meta. 20(4), pp. 271-307.

Myers, H. (1974). Some Abbreviations for Energy Units in France. Meta. 19(4), pp. 203-205. https://doi.org/10.7202/003685ar

Noguera-Díaz, Y. Pérez-Paredes, P. (2020). Teaching acronyms to the military: A paper-based DDL approach. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.02.01

Ogli, S. (2025). Methodology for Developing Studentsʼ Reading Comprehension Skills Based on the Interpretation of Social Abbreviations in English. American Journal of Philological Sciences. Vol. 05, Issue 04, pp. 44-47. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/volume05issue04-12

Richards, J.C., Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Bungay: Longman,

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. (2018). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wakabayashi, J. (1996). Teaching Medical Translation. Meta. Vol. 41, № 3, pp. 356-365. https://doi.org/10.7202/004584ar

Published
2026-05-31
How to Cite
Kovalchuk, N. (2026). English abbreviations in the field of education: thematic classification and teaching methods. Teaching Languages at Higher Educational Establishments at the Present Stage. Intersubject Relations, (48), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.26565/2073-4379-2026-48-03