Formation of digital competence of future philologists through internet resources: theoretical-methodological and practice-oriented perspectives

Keywords: digital competence, digitalization, Internet resources, synchronous and asynchronous learning

Abstract

The relevance of this study is driven by the rapid digitalization of society, which fundamentally reshapes the educational landscape and alters the professional competencies required of philologists and foreign language educators. Digitalization is viewed not merely as an auxiliary tool but as a critical prerequisite for effective professional activity in technology-rich environments. This necessitates the development of an integrated set of digital, communicative, linguistic, and research skills in future specialists, aligning with the contemporary labor market demands and frameworks such as DigComp and DigCompEdu. The study aims to identify the theoretical and methodological foundations for fostering digital competence in future philologists and to propose practice-oriented recommendations for the systematic integration of Internet resources into English language instruction. Methodologically, the research employs a comprehensive analysis of scientific, pedagogical, and linguodidactic literature, as well as systematization, classification, and modeling techniques. The conceptual scope of “digital competence of a philologist” is clarified. A functional classification of Internet resources for foreign language teaching was conducted, resulting in the identification of five categories: resources for working with authentic language materials, platforms for developing language skills, tools for creating digital learning content, LMS platforms and synchronous communication tools, and resources for assessment and self-assessment. The study highlights that Internet resources are a potent instrument for enhancing student motivation, personalizing learning, providing access to authentic materials, and fostering the comprehensive development of digital, linguistic, and communicative competencies. However, effective integration requires addressing challenges such as technical limitations, digital inequality, and critical evaluation of content and digital security concerns. Future research directions include empirical studies to assess the impact of different types of resources on learning outcomes and the design of adaptive learning models tailored to diverse learner profiles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bykov, V.Yu., Zhaldak, M.I., Morze, N.V., Ovcharuk, O.V., Spirin, O.M. (2021). Digital competence of the modern teacher of the new Ukrainian school. Kyiv: M.P. Drahomanov NPU [in Ukrainian].

Soroko, N.V., Pinchuk, O.P., Lytvynova, S.H., Leshchenko, M.P. (2020). Digital competencies of teachers: content and ways of formation. Information technologies and teaching tools. 75 (1), pp. 203-220 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.33407/itlt.v75i1.3596

Bonwell, C.C., Eison, J.A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.

Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A., Wesche, M. (1989). Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. EUR 28558 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ repository/handle/JRC106281 [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.2760/38842

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. EUR 28558 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106281 [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.2760/38842

Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (2018/C 189/01). Official Journal of the European Union.

Cullinan, J., Flannery, D., Harold, J. et al. (2021). The disconnected: COVID-19 and disparities in access to quality broadband for higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 18, Article 26. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1 [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1

Dougherty, D. (2012). The Maker Movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. 7 (3), pp. 11-14. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.

Johns, T. (1991). Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. Language and Computers. 4 (1), pp. 105¬-117.

Miras, S., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Mateo-Guillen, C. (2023). Implications of the digital divide: a systematic review of its impact in the educational field. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 13 (3), pp. 936-950. Available at: https://www.jotse.org/index.php/ jotse/article/view/2249/777 [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.3926/jotse.2249

Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108 (6), pp. 1017¬-1054. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. 9 (5), pp. 1-6. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education. 93 (3), pp. 223-231. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Puentedura, R.R. (2014). SAMR: A Brief Introduction. Available at: http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefIntroduction.pdf [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025].

Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Punie, Y. (Ed.). EUR 28775 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466 [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.2760/159770

Seiz Ortiz, R., Carrió Pastor, M.L. (2025). Classification of Technology-based Language Learning Resources according to Pedagogical and Functional Criteria. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada. 23 (1). Available at: https://matrix.aesla.org.es/index.php/RAEL/article/view/676 [Accessed 13 Sept. 2025]. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.58859/rael.v23i1.676

Schmidt, M., Tschida, C. (2020). Learning experience design: Leveraging design thinking for creating educational ecosystems. Educational Technology. 60 (6), pp. 3-14.

Warschauer, M., Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Language Teaching, 31 (2), pp. 57-71. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970

Warschauer, M., Nunan, D. (2004). Technology and language learning: Challenges and opportunities. Applied Linguistics. 25 (4), pp. 520-545.

Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Pavlenko, O., & Hrechukha, L. (2025). Formation of digital competence of future philologists through internet resources: theoretical-methodological and practice-oriented perspectives. Teaching Languages at Higher Educational Establishments at the Present Stage. Intersubject Relations, (47), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.26565/2073-4379-2025-47-06