To the issue of research work presentation by foreign students (part 2 – answering the questions).
Abstract
The article deals with the methods of forming communicative skills of public defense of a diploma or anessay project (the second part of the presentation – answering the questions of the audience). The factors that are necessary for a successful presentation of foreign-language research papers written by foreign students have been determined. The types of questions that are specific for this type of speech interaction have been analyzed. Recommendations for the system of exercises aimed at the development of dialogical professionally-oriented communication, the basis of which is strict compliance with the standard norms of the official sphere of communication, have been developed. The necessity of foreign students of senior courses for public professional communication has been proved. It has been emphasized that observation of the standard norms by participants of speech interaction ensures standardization of the presentation procedure, which positively influences the result of protection. The author scientifically substantiates the importance of forming foreign students' abilities to provide feedback both verbal and non-verbal levels. The results of the study provide the opportunity to use the recommended methodology for improving the communicative competence of students in the process of studying the Ukrainian language as a foreign language. Recommendations can serve as the basis for the development of methodological guidelines for the defense of diploma and essay project, as well as for the creation of teaching aids that facilitate the formation and improvement of communicative skills that ensure the effectiveness of a presentation speech act.
Downloads
References
Aleksyeyenko, T.M. and Fadyeyeva, O.YU. (2018). Formuvannya vmin prezentatsii naukovo-doslidnoi roboty inozemnymy studentamy (ch. 1, dopovid) [Formation of skills of foreign students’ foreign students research work presentation (part 1, report)]. Vykladannya mov u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh na suchasnomu etapi. Mizhpredmetni zvyazky [Teaching languages at higher educational institutions at the present stage. Intersubject connections]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 33, pp. 7–15 [in Ukrainian].
Bogdanov, V.V. (1987). Funktsii verbalnykh i neverbalnykh komponentov v rechevom obshenii [Functions of verbal and non-verbal components in speech communication]. Yazykovoe obshenie [Language Communication]. Kalinin: Kal.GU, pp. 18–25 [in Russian]
Guseva, G.G. and Tarasova, S.V. (2002). Kritichnyi diskurs kak tip diskursa [Critical discourse as a type of discourse]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo slavyanskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the International Slavic University]. Kharkiv: MSU, 3, pp. 3–6 [in Russian].
Koltunova, M.V. (2004). Konventsiya kak pragmaticheskii faktor dialogicheskogo obshcheniya [Convention as a pragmatic factor of dialogic communication]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics]. Moscow: Nauka, 6, pp. 100–116 [in Russian].
Kuznetsova, I.V. (2012). Krytyka ta zauvazhennya v diloviy komunikatsiyi [Criticism and comments in business communication]. Metodyka i praktyka linhvistychnoi pidhotovky [Questions of linguistics]. Kharkiv: NMU, 6, pp. 101–106 [in Ukrainian].
