Online EFL Learning in Ukraine: Comparing Secondary School Learners’ and Teachers’ Perceptions

Keywords: distant/online learning, effectiveness, English as a foreign language, experience, virtual environment

Abstract

The transition to online EFL instruction in Ukraine, induced by wartime disruptions, has become a necessity. Yet, there is a limited understanding of how language teachers and learners perceive its effectiveness. This study, therefore, examined how secondary school learners and teachers in rural Ukraine assess the effectiveness, benefits, and shortcomings of online instruction, and whether the length of their respective experience influences their perceptions.

The study employed a quantitative survey design, eliciting data from 98 secondary school EFL learners and 22 teachers using an adapted questionnaire based on Zou et al. (2021). The data were analysed statistically through independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, and simple linear regression. The results revealed that learners considered online EFL instruction as more effective than teachers did. While both groups expressed similar views concerning key advantages, such as flexibility, accessibility, and technology use, teachers were more inclined to endorse an immediate feedback. No statistically significant differences were found in the reported disadvantages, although teachers were more concerned about student engagement and interaction, whereas learners more often pointed to issues with the variety of instructional techniques. Notably, longer involvement with online instruction emerged as a significant predictor of more favourable effectiveness ratings, albeit modest. Overall, these findings underscore key role experience plays in shaping online learning and teaching attitudes while pointing to the need for meaningful experience and ongoing digital competence development for learners and teachers alike.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marianna Lőrincz, Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian University

Doctor of Sciences, Full Professor, Professor of the Philology Department

Tamás Vrabel, Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian University

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Philology Department

Hanna Taranenko

4th-year student, Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian University

References

Lukina, T. O. (2021). Dystantsiine navchannia v zahalnii serednii osviti v Ukraini: dostupnist ta rezultatyvnist v umovakh pandemii [Distance education in general secondary education in Ukraine: Availability and efficiency in a pandemic]. Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity. Seriia «Sotsialni ta povedinkovi nauky [Bulletin of Postgraduate Education. Social and Behavioral Sciences Series], 16(45), 224–252. https://doi.org/10.32405/2522-9931-2021-16(45)-224-252 (in Ukrainian).

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive learning environments, 31(2), 863-875.

Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on students’ performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 1, Article 253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0

Al-Dosari, H. (2011). Faculty members and students’ perceptions of e-learning in the English department: A project evaluation. Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 391–407.

Babu, D. G. S., & Sridevi, D. K. (2018). Importance of e-learning in higher education: A study. International Journal of Research in Culture and Society, 2, 84–88.

Buglass, S. L., Stacey, P. C., & Guest, D. (2024). Towards a new era of flexibility: Student and staff reflections on online learning. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(4), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.746

Çakmakkaya, Ö. S., Meydanlı, E. G., Kafadar, A. M., Demirci, M. S., Süzer, Ö., Ar, M. C., ... & Gönen, M. S. (2024). Factors affecting medical students’ satisfaction with online learning: A regression analysis of a survey. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 11.

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), Article 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Cook, D. A., & Thompson, W. G. (2014). Comfort and experience with online learning: Trends over nine years and associations with knowledge. BMC Medical Education, 14, Article 1.

Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1

Horton, W. (2012). E-learning by design. John Wiley & Sons.

Hubbard, P. (2019). Five keys from the past to the future of CALL. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 9(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2019070101

King, B. (2010). Variance. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1607-1608). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n491

Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

Lőrincz, M. (2022). Overview of English language teaching challenges. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, 95, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2022-95-13

Lőrincz, M., & Komar, O. (2023). Weathering the storm: Unraveling the challenges of EFL student teaching in Ukraine. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 17(2), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10015763

Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329

Moore, J., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Pandita, D., & Kumar, V. V. R. (2023). Online teaching and its impact on self-monitoring of faculty members: Learnings for the future from a pandemic. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2022-0059

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/reinderswhite.pdf

Rodriguez, M. C., Ooms, A., & Montañez, M. (2008). Students’ perceptions of online-learning quality given comfort, motivation, satisfaction, and experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(2), 105–120. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/7.2.2.pdf

Salkind, N. J. (2010). Chi-square test. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 145-149). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n48

Salkind, N. J (2010). Fisher's least significant difference test. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 492-494). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n154

Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Stone, E. R. (2010). t Test, Independent Samples. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 1552-1556). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n475

Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/215995/

van Leeuwen, A. (2023). Teachers’ experiences of monitoring their students in online higher education: Recommendations for course design and opportunities for learning analytics. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2254297

Wei, Z. (2018). Discussion on the effective application of information technology in informatization EFL teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(10), 1294–1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0810.06

Zou, B., Huang, L., Ma, W., & Qiu, Y. (2021). Evaluation of the effectiveness of EFL online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054491

Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Lőrincz, M., Vrabel, T., & Taranenko, H. (2025). Online EFL Learning in Ukraine: Comparing Secondary School Learners’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (102), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-5312-2025-102-12