Annotation as a Tool of Multimodal Analysis: From Text to Meaning
Abstract
The article focuses on the role of annotation as an effective tool for meaning-making in multimodal texts. The relevance of annotations lies in their ability to capture all aspects of semiotic interaction, integrate semiotic resources beyond linguistic elements, and reveal generalized patterns of communication. The objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of annotating environmental videos produced by Greenpeace aiming to determine the content aspects of multimodal constructions related to climatic change. The research methods are based on Grounded Theory, emphasizing data coding and categorization to uncover key themes and patterns in the meaning-making process. The annotation methodology is based on the principles of selectivity, sequentiality, segmentation, and systematicity, encompassing several stages: data collection, transcription, coding, and interpretation. Initial coding led to the identification of various codes, which subsequently formed three key categories. The first category, EMOTIONAL AND SENSORY IMPACT, includes codes that stimulate emotional responses and sensory engagement from the audience. The second category, ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT, encompasses codes illustrating various aspects of environmental threats, including their causes, effects on the environment, and potential victims. The third category, ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIONS AND RESPONSES, consists of codes that represent possible approaches to counter climate change. The integration of these categories yields a central category—ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS THROUGH EMOTIONAL AND SENSORY EXPERIENCE, which encapsulates the multifaceted impact of environmental issues. This suggests that the interplay of emotions, threats, and actions is fundamental to the meaning-making process in videos created by Greenpeace.
Downloads
References
Baldry, A., & Thibault, J. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. London/Oakville: Equinox.
Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Study of Multimodal Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bohle, U. (2013). Approaching notation, coding, and analysis from a conversational analysis point of view. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 992-1007). Volume 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cardoso, B. & Cohn, N. (2022). The Multimodal Annotation Software Tool (MAST). Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022), Marseille, 20-25 June (pp. 6822–6828). European Language Resources Association (ELRA). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/3vpce
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications.
Doyle, Julie. (2007). Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication. Science as Culture, 16(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701368938
Edward, J. (2001). The Transcription of Discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 321–348). Oxford: Blackwell.
Greenpeace. (n.d.). Retrieved from:https://www.greenpeace.org/international/about/
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Oxon: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas. General introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London and New York: Routledge.
Konderak, P. (2021). Towards an integration of two aspects of semiosis – A cognitive semiotic perspective. Sign Systems Studies, 49(1/2), 132-165. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.06
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.
Krysanova, T. (2022). Emergent meaning-making in multimodal discourse: A case for sadness in The Horse Whisperer. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 24, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2022-24-03
Norris, S. (2004). An Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
Saldana, J. (2014). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage Publications.
Shevchenko, I. S. (2023). Stsenarii smyslotvorennia v mediadyskursi: kohnityvnyj i mul’tymodal’nyj analiz [Scenarios of meaning-making in media discourse: cognitive and multimodal analysis]. Naukovyj visnyk Khersons’koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Hermanistyka ta mizhkul’turna komunikatsiia», 1, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2663-3426/2023-1-14 (in Ukrainian)
Smith, B. A., Tan, S., Podlasov, A., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Analysing multimodality in an interactive digital environment: software as a meta-semiotic tool. Social Semiotics, 21(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.564386
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications.
ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIAL
BREAKING: Shell’s Arctic oil rig in sight (2013). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGic2E8evhY
The air I breathe. (2020). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_p-DpkOwno&ab_channel=GreenpeaceInternational
Wasteminster: A Downing Street Disaster. (2021). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr6RqGg6ExE&ab_
channel=GreenpeaceUK
Why Arctic sea ice melting matters. (2012). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUZJYEM0ixc