Environmental Ethics in Foreign Language Teaching: an Eco-social Aesthetics Multimodality Dimension
Abstract
As the twenty-first century world ecology state has created the urgent need for wholistic educational projects to be implemented, this article focuses on the actual issue of teaching environmental ethics through teaching foreign languages with an emphasis on the multimodality aspect of both verbalized and non-verbalized eco-social aesthetics as media for ecological meaning development, which constitutes its aim, thus contributing not only to foreign language education but to overall sustainability literacy within the framework of higher education. As a result of the authors’ analysis of research papers in the corresponding field, the status of the pedagogical concept ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS as a fundamental one in modern linguodidactics has been substantiated. An experientially tested outcome approach to teaching environmental ethics within the framework of eco-social aesthetics in the process of teaching foreign languages (English, in our case) has been outlined. It has been revealed that in response to the current eco-social crisis, it is both verbally and non-verbally represented eco-social aesthetics in its multimodal dimensions that can serve as a highly efficient and intellectually challenging vehicle for pursuing integrated environmental, social, educational and cultural sustainability objectives. It has been proved that the application of an art-based eco-social aesthetics foreign language teaching increases students’ eco-language and eco-social skills, as well as a sense of connectedness with their environment. The work is methodologically based on both global educational objectives for environmental language education and internationally established CLIL principles. Our findings demonstrate that the developed ecolinguodidactic strategy with its focus on students’ engagement with the environmental social concerns through multimodal eco-art aesthetics and its verbal representations greatly encourages learners’ critical thinking, decision making and foreign language acquisition.
Downloads
References
Allen, C., Metternicht, G., Wiedmann, T., & Pedercini, M. (2021). Global sustainability modelling national transformations to achieve the SDGs within planetary boundaries in small island developing states. Global Sustainability, 4, 1–13. DOI: 10.1017/sus.2021.13.
Bachman, L. R. (2007). Eco-aesthetics: bridging architectural and ecological motivations. Aesthetics, architecture, complexity theory, sustainable building design, systems theory, ecology, environmental sustainability, sustainability. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/14516320/ECO_AESTHETICS_BRIDGING_ARCHITECTURAL_AND_ECOLOGICAL_MOTIVATIONS_2007_.
Balcare, K. (2022). Ecotheatre: Changing Perspective From WHO WE ARE Towards WHERE WE ARE. Culture Crossroads, 21,56-65. DOI: 10.55877/cc.vol21.271.
Bellarmine, N. (2022). Why education systems should build environmental ethics into every subject. The Conversation Newsletter. Retrieved from: https://theconversation.com/why-education-systems-should-build-environmental-ethics-into-every-subject-173078.
Black, J. E., Morrison, K., Urquhart, J., Potter ,C., Courtney, P., & Goodenough, A. (2023). Bringing the arts into socio-ecological research: An analysis of the barriers and opportunities to collaboration across the divide. People and nature, 5(4), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10489.
Bothe, M. (2014). The Ethics, Principles and Objectives of Protection of the Environment in Times of Armed Conflict. In R. Rayfuse (Ed.). War and the Environment. New Approaches to Protecting the Environment in Relation to Armed Conflict. (pp. 91-108). Leiden, the Netherlands: De Gruyter and Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270657_006.
Chang, S., & Cheng, H. (2021). Bilingual education: Environmental ecology in CLIL classroom. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 637, 791-795.
Dallyono, R., & Sukyadi, D. (2019). An analysis of multimodal resources in environmental protection posters. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 472-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20245
Diavati, M. (2023). Sustainable education. Enhanced CLIL-ing. A wake-up call transforming English language education for sustainable learning in the 21st century. A case study from Greece. US-China Education Review B, 13(4), 251-260. DOI: https://10.17265/2161-6248/2023.04.006.
Dombayci, M. A. (2014). Teaching of environmental ethics: Caring thinking. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 15(3), 1404-1421.
Fletcher, Ch. (2023). The Importance of Environmental Education for a Sustainable Future. Earth.org. Retrieved from: https:/earth.org/environmental-education/.
Forbes, D. (2023). An Ecology of the Heart: Faith through the Climate Crisis. Oxford: SLG Press.
Francesconi, S. (2015). Green hypermodality: a social semiotic multimodal analysis of the ‘Green your house’ webpage. In O. Palusci (Ed.), Green Canada (pp. 1-10). Bern: Peter Lang.
Gillespie, A. (2018). The Long Road to Sustainability: The Past, Present, and Future of International Environmental Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819516.001.0001.
Halliwell, P., Whipple, S., Hassel, K., Bowser , G., White Husic, D., & Brown, M. (2020). Twenty-First-Century Climate Education: Developing Diverse, Confident, and Competent Leaders in Environmental Sustainability. Bulletin. Ecological Society of America, 101(2), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1664.
MacDonald, S. (2013). The Ecocinema Experience. In S. Rust, S. Monani and S. Cubitt (Eds.), Ecocinema Theory and Practice (pp. 17-41). Abingdon: Routledge.
Marković, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. Iperception, 3(1), 1-17. DOI: https://10.1068/i0450aap.
Micalay-Hurtado, M. & Poole, R. (2022). Eco-critical language awareness for English language teaching (ELT): Promoting justice, wellbeing, and sustainability in the classroom. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0023
Mason, H. (2006). Teaching Environmental Ethics to Non-Specialist Students. In C. Palmer (Ed.), Teaching environmental ethics. (pp. 230-236). Leiden: Brill.
Miles, M. (2014). Eco-Aesthetics: Art, Literature and Architecture in a Period of Climate Change (Radical Aesthetics-Radical Art). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Naess, A. (2005). The deep ecology movement: Some philosophical aspects. In A. Drengson & H. Glasser (Eds.), Selected Works of Arne Naess, X. (pp. 33–55). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
New World Encyclopedia. (2022). Retrieved from: https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Aesthetics.
Nur, S., Anas, I., & Pilu, R. (2022). The Call for Environmentally-Based Language Teaching and Green Pedagogy: Climate Actions in Language Education. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i1.9526.
Palmer, C. (Ed.). (2006). Teaching Environmental Ethics. Leiden: Brill Academic Pub.
Papi1, D., & Haque, N. (2023). Teaching Second Language through Green Pedagogy in the Context of Bangladesh: A Methodological Approach. Performance: Journal of English Education and Literature, 2(3), 291-302.
Rolston, H. (1999). Ethics and the environment. Types of environmental ethics. In E. Baker, E. and M. (Eds.), Ethics Applied (pp. 407-437). New York: Simon &Shchuster. doi: https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2023-26-08.
Shamaieva, I., Paschal, M. J., & Gougou, S. A.-M. (2023). The ECOSOPHY concept in discourses of language education: a cross-cultural perspective. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 26, 140-151. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2023-26-08.
Schander, C., Balma, B., & Massa, A. (2013). The joy of art in the EFL classroom. European Scientific Journal, 2, 409-414.
Simus, J. (2008). Environmental art and ecological citizenship. Environmental ethics, 30(1), 21-36.
Sparshott, F. E. (1963). The Structure of Aesthetics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctvfrxjqj.
Stibbe, A. (2023). Taste the feeling: an ecolinguistic analysis of Coca-Cola advertising. Journal of World Languages. Journal of World Languages, 1-24. doi: https://10.1515/jwl-2023- 0027.
Sunassee, A., Bokhoree, C., & Patrizio, A. (2021). Students’ Empathy for the Environment through Eco-Art Place-Based Education: A Review Ecologies, 2(2), 214-247; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies2020013.
Teigiserova, D. (2024). Sustainability Renaissance: embracing strong sustainability in the 21st century and leaving the weak sustainability in the past. Erasmus University Rotterdam blogposts. Retrieved from: https://www.eur.nl/en/news/sustainability-renaissance-embracing-strong-sustainability-21st-century-and-leaving-weak.
United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special edition. Towards a rescue plan for people an planet. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/attachments/bda691d0-ca02-4144-8bf7-c784b104ec84/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf.
Wanselin, H., Danielsson, K., & Wikman, S. (2023). Meaning-making in ecology education: Analysis of students’ multimodal texts. Education Sciences, 13(5), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050443.
Watts, R. (2022). A new generation of students are poised to green the world. ArtsHub. Retrieved from: https://www.artshub.com.au/news/sponsored-content/a-new-generation-of-students-are-poised-to-green-the-world-2526557/.
Zeng, F. (2019). Construction and Development of Ecological Aesthetics. Introduction to Ecological Aesthetics (pp. 347-363). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8984-9_15
