Expressives in the speeches of Chinese-speaking And English-speaking politicians

  • Svitlana Virotchenko Dean of School of Foreign Languages of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-5696
  • Yulia Nikitina lecturer of the Department of Oriental Languages and Intercultural Communication of School of Foreign Languages of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1017-9298
  • Angelina Ivanova
Keywords: discourse, expressive, political discourse, speech act, speech influence

Abstract

The aim of the article is to investigate and compare the use of expressives in the speeches of Chinese-speaking and English-speaking politicians. The relevance is driven by the necessity to analyze the means of expressing emotions and their impact on the audience in order to accurately interpret politicians’ speeches and understand their intentions, thus preempting potential manipulations. The objectives of this research are to: examine the concepts of “discourse,” “political discourse,” and “expressive”; analyze expressives in the speeches of Chinese-speaking and English-speaking politicians and compare them; systematize expressives; develop a classification of linguistic means for expressing emotions. The object of the study is political discourse. The subject of the study is expressives in the speeches of English-speaking and Chinese-speaking politicians. The article discusses expressiveness of speech behavior and use of speech attacks employed by English-speaking and Chinese-speaking politicians in their speeches. The research revealed significant differences in the expressives of speech etiquette. It is noted that English-speaking politicians, compared to Chinese-speaking ones, adhere less to the official-business style. Chinese-speaking politicians tend to show more respect towards the audience. As a result, there are different means of influence: English-speaking politicians thus “connect” with the people, while Chinese-speaking politicians demonstrate respect, highlighting the dissimilarity in people’s values. Similarity in the use of expressives was also noted, particularly in politely expressing dissatisfaction, highlighting the success of their state, and expressing faith in a better future

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Svitlana Virotchenko, Dean of School of Foreign Languages of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

hD in Philology, Associate Professor

Angelina Ivanova

a student of Foreign Languages School of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

References

Batsevych, F. S. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoi linhvistyky. [Foundations of Communicative Linguistics]. Kyiv: Akademiia Publ.(in Ukrainian)

Bezuhla, L. R., Kryvoruchko S. I., & Berbenets D. V. (2023). Multymodalna metaprahmatyka nimetskomovnoho reklamnoho dyskursu.[Multimodal metapragmatics of German advertising discourse]. Visnyk KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Inozemna filolohiia. Metodyka vykladannia inozemnykh mov [The journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University] 98, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-5312-2023-98-01

Velivchenko, V. O. (2014). Komunikatyvne vyiavlennia ekspresyvnosti ta ekspresyva v suchasnii anhliiskii movi [Communicative revealing of expressiveness and expression in modern English]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia Filolohichni nauky [Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Philological Series] 27, 28-35. (in Ukrainian).

Petrenko, V. V. (2007). Osoblyvosti vyznachennia politychnoi movy. Politychnyj menedzhment [ Features of the definition of political language. Political management] № 2, 16–24. (in Ukrainian).

Pocheptsov, H. H. (1999). Teoriia komunikatsii. 2-he vyd.[The theory of communication. 2nd Edition]. Kyiv:”Kyivskyi universytet”. (in Ukrainian).

Samokhina, V. O. (2012). Zhart u suchasnomu komunikatyvnomu prostori Velykoi Brytanii ta SShA: monohrafiia [A Joke in the Modern Communication Space of the United Kingdom and the United States]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. (in Ukrainian).

Shevchenko, I. S. & Morozova, O. I. (2005). Problemy typolohii dyskursu. Dyskurs yak kohnityvno-komunikatyvnyi fenomen: monohrafiia [Problems of discourse typology. Discourse as a cognitive and communicative phenomenon: a monograpy]. Kharkiv: Konstanta.

Yumrukuz, A. A. (2021). Prahmastylistychni osoblyvosti elektoralnoho dyskursu (na materiali peredvyborchykh prezydentskykh teledebativ) [Pragmatic features of electoral discourse (based on the material of the pre-election presidential TV debates)]. Visnyk KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Inozemna filolohiia. Metodyka vykladannia inozemnykh mov [The journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University] 92, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2020-92-09

Habermas, J. (1989). Erlduterungen zum Begriff des kommunikativen Handelns // Habermas J. Vorstudien und Ergdnzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verl., 571-606.

Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. – Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.

Jeanne Tsai Culture and Emotion. Retrieved from: https://nobaproject.com/modules/culture-and-emotion#content

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge, United Kingdom: University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Critical Discourse Analysis. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11(1). 11–52.

Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Virotchenko, S., Nikitina, Y., & Ivanova, A. (2024). Expressives in the speeches of Chinese-speaking And English-speaking politicians. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (99), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-5312-2024-99-06