Thematic classification of English abbreviations for language teaching organizations. Introduction

Keywords: English abbreviations, classification, language teaching, organizations, thematic groups, thematic subgroups

Abstract

The article analyzes the distribution of thematic subgroups (TSG) of English abbreviations within the thematic group (TG) "Names of language teaching organizations". Basing on the similar thematic classification studies of Ukrainian terminology, the authors found the lack of relevant research on English abbreviations, which, together with the need for their systematic thematic classification, allowed them to substantiate the relevance of the study, aimed to identify the said TSGs. The objectives involved the selection of the corpus, its analysis, as well as the formulation of conclusions and the prospects of further research. English terminology is a specific system based on the relevant conceptual features. It comprises a number of TGs, i.e. the sets of lexemes grouped together according to their extralinguistic properties. The criterion for defining a TG is a denotative feature reflecting the extralinguistic reality. The distribution of lexemes among the TGs is an important task of studying any terminological system. The corpus included 122 abbreviations selected from the original English-language sources. TSGs of English abbreviations within the said TG have varying degrees of complexity. The most sophisticated ones are the TSGs related to "Organizations directly involved in language teaching" (19%), "Government agencies" (14%) and some others. The proposed TSGs vary in their quantitative composition, structural type, parts of speech their full forms belong to, as well as the auxiliary words strategies. Some abbreviations are formally synonymic, though denoting different organizations. The analyzed TG includes ten TSGs, whose logic and clarity is provided for by the common conceptual features of their constituents, which are carriers of their thematic integrity. The said components are based on different term-formation models that constitute the prospect of further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borodina, N. S. (2013). Osnovni klasyfikatsiini riady v ukrainskii linhvodydaktychnii terminolohii [Principal classification categories un Ukrainian language teaching terminology]. Terminolohichnyi visnyk [Terminological Messenger], 2(1), 145–149. (in Ukrainian)

Farion, I. (ed.). (2017). Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia «Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii» [National Lviv Polytechnic University Messenger. Problems of Ukrainian Terminology], 869. Lviv : Lvivska Politekhnika Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Herasimova, O. M. (2016). Osoblyvosti perekladu terminiv (na prykladi prykordonnoho dyskursu). [Specifics of terminology translation (on the material of Border Guards discourse)]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu . Ser. Filolohiia [Scholarly Messenger of International Humanitarian University. Philology Series], 22, 180–182. (in Ukrainian)

Koval, R., Tyravska O. (2017). Problemy perekladu terminolohii reabilitatsii [Problems of rehabilitation terminology translation]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia «Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii» [National Lviv Polytechnic University Messenger. Problems of Ukrainian Terminology], 869. 39-46. (in Ukrainian)

Kozak, L. V. Tematychna struktura ukrainskoi tekhnichnoi terminolohii [Thematic structure of Ukrainian technological terminology]. Available at: http://ukrmova.com.ua/2011/Artcl15.pdf. (in Ukrainian)

Lepekha, T. V. (2000). Leksyko-semantychni ta slovotvirno-strukturni osoblyvosti sudovo-medychnoi terminolohii: Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Lexical, semantic, word-formation and structural specifics of forensic terminology. Cand.phil.sci. diss. synopsis]. Dnipropetrovsk. (in Ukrainian)

Ivashchenko, V. L. (ed.). (2017). Terminolohichnyi visnyk [Terminological Messenger]: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu ukrainskoi movy NANU [Journal of scholarly papers of the Ukrainian Language Institute, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences], 4. Kyiv, Instytut ukrainskoi movy NANU Publ. (in Ukrainian)

Khalinovska, L. A. Tematychni hrupy na poznachennia nazv litalnykh aparativ ta povitrianykh suden v ukrainskii avialeksytsi [Thematic groups to indicate aircraft and other air vehicles in Ukrainian aviation terminology]. Available at: http://term-in.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=19&lang=uk (in Ukrainian)

Kharchuk, L.V. (2013). Tematychna klasyfikatsiia ukrainskykh elektroenerhetychnykh terminiv [Thematic classification of Ukrainian terminology in electric power production]. Terminolohichnyi visnyk [Terminological Messenger], 2(2), 72–77. (in Ukrainian)

Chorna, O. V. (2017). Pryntsypy systemnoho analizu ukrainskykh podatkovykh terminiv [Principles of tax terminology systemic analysis]. Terminolohichnyi visnyk [Terminological Messenger], 4. 198–204. (in Ukrainian)

Shmatko, I. V. (2015). Osoblyvosti systemnoi orhanizatsii ukrainskykh bdzhilnytskykh terminiv za tematychnymy i leksyko-semantychnymy hrupamy [Specifics of bee-breeding terminology systemic organization into thematic and lexical-semantic groups]. Terminolohichnyi visnyk [Terminological Messenger], 3(2). 198–210. (in Ukrainian)

Acronyms Related to TESL. Internet TESL Journal. Available at: http://www.Iteslj.org > acronyms

al-Qinai, J. (2007). Abbreviation and Acronymy in English Arabic Translation. Meta, 52 (2), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.7202/016082ar

Belda, J. R. (2004). Translating Computer Abbreviations from English into Spanish: Main Types and Problems. Meta, 49(4), 920–929.

Fijo Leуn, M. I. and Fuentes, Luque A. (2013). A Corpus-based Approach to the Compilation, Analysis, and Translation of Rural Tourism Terms. Meta. 58 (1), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.7202/1023817ar

Gehenot, D. (1975). Le sigle : aperçu linguistique. Meta, 20 (4), 271–307.

Myers, H. (1974). Some Abbreviations for Energy Units in France. Meta, 19 (4), 203–205. https://doi.org/10.7202/003685ar

Nicaise, L. (2011). On Going Beyond the Literal: Translating Metaphorical Conceptualizations in Financial Discourse. Meta, 56 (2), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.7202/1006184ar

Resche, C. (2000). Equivocal Economic Terms or Terminology Revisited. Meta, 45 (1), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.7202/003940ar

Richards, J. C., and Schmidt R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Bungay : Longman.

Rodríguez González, F. (1993). Morphovariation and Synonymy of Acronyms. Meta, 38 (2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.7202/002941ar

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (2018). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Wakabayashi, J. (1996). Teaching Medical Translation. Meta, 41(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.7202/004584ar

Published
2020-06-26
How to Cite
Черноватий, Л. М., & Ковальчук, Н. М. (2020). Thematic classification of English abbreviations for language teaching organizations. Introduction. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (91). https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2020-91-21