Assessment Factor in Stereotyping of Sociocultural Groups in American Linguoculture

Keywords: assessment, assessment norms, social standards, a sociocultural stereotype, stereotyping

Abstract

The paper deals with the analysis of assessment factor that conditions stereotyping of sociocultural information in American linguoculture. With the purpose to identify the parameters of evaluation of sociocultural groups, different types of assessment that influence stereotyping are considered. Stereotyping as a process of emergence, anchoring and transference of stereotypes in discourse, is always accompanied by evaluation of axiologically relevant traits of representatives of socio-cultural groups, thus the topical question is to analyze social standards and norms that determine evaluation. Researchers have recognized evaluative nature of stereotypes, which are structures of generalized and schematic representation of images based on a small number of traits of evaluative character. Assessment of the facts of socio-cultural environment is clearly reflected in interpretative nomination of stereotypes. Evaluation norms are motivated by generally accepted standards with which new phenomena of public life are compared. Different social groups have different ideas and evaluation criteria. Therefore, apart from positive and negative stereotypes, there are ambivalent ones. At societal level, prosperity, success, and enhancement of social status achieved through hard work is the starting point for evaluation on the scale of American social values, so the poles of positive and negative assessment are correlated with a person's success or failure, his/ her orientation toward achievement. At a group level, non-compliance with standards of a group in activities and interests is perceived negatively and arouses contempt for those who violate group norms. Verbal expression of appreciation occurs in stereotype nominations, predicates, and propositions. Verbal expression of assessment occurs in nominations of stereotypes, predicates, and propositions.  Expressing the norms and values of the ethnos, sociocultural stereotypes can function as evaluative patterns to which objects of a social environment are compared.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arutjunova, N.D. (1999). Jazyk i mir cheloveka.[Language and the World of Man]. 2-e izd., ispr. Moskva : Jazyki russkoj kul'tury. (in Russian)

Boldyrev, N. N. (2002). Struktura i principy formirovanija ocenochnyh kategorij [The structure and the principles of assessment categories’ formation]. S ljubov'ju k jazyku [With Love to The Language]. IJa RAN, Voronezhskij gos. un-t. 103–113. (in Russian)

Vasil'ev, L.M. (1996). Semanticheskaja kategorija ocenki i ocenochnye predikaty [Semantic assessement category and assessement predicates]. Issledovanija po semantike : Semanticheskie kategorii v russkom jazyke [Research on Semantics: Semantic Categories in Russian]. Bashkir, gos. un-t: Ufa. 55–62. (in Russian)

Vol'f, E.M. (2002). Funkcional'aja semantika ocenki [Functional Semantics of Assessment]. Izd. 2-e, dop. Moskva : Editorial URSS. (in Russian)

Kosmeda, T. A. (1999). Kategoriya ocinky` v ukrayins`komu movoznavstvi [Assessment category in Ukrainian linguistics] Ukrayins`ka filologiya : shkoly`, postati, problemy` [Ukrainian Philology: Schools, Personalities, Issues]: zb. nauk. pr. L`viv, ch. 2. 138–146. (in Ukrainian)

Ljubimova, S. A. (2015). Lingvokul'turnyj tipazh «devushka-flapper» v amerikanskom diskurse. Semantiko-kognitivnye i pragmaticheskie aspekty reprezentacii. [Lingua-cultural type “Flapper” in American discourse. Semantic, cognitive and pragmatic aspects of representation]. Saarbrücken : LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. (in Russian)

Mushelishvili, N. L., Sergeev V. M., Shrejder Ju. A. (1996). Cennostnaja refleksija i konflikty v razdelennom obshhestve [Value reflection and conflict in a divided society]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philology]. №11. 3–23. (in Russian)

Pry`xod`ko, G.I. (2013). Ocinka i komunikaciya [Assessement and communication]: Posibny`k dlya studentiv i aspirantiv. Vinny`cya: Nova kny`ga. (in Ukrainian)

Chernejko, L.O. (1990). Ocenka v znake i znak v ocenke [Assessement in sign and sign in assessment] Filologicheskie nauki [Philology Sciences]. № 2. 72–81.(in Russian)

Beukeboom, C.J., Burgers, Ch. (2019). How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework. Review of Communication Research. Vol.7, 1–37. doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.017

Brewer, M. B. (1996). Ethnocentrism and Prejudice: A Search for Universals, Social Psychology of Prejudice: Historical and Contemporary Issues. Ed. Christian S. Crandall, Lewinian Press, 79-95.

Croom, A. M. (2014). Spanish slurs and stereotypes for Mexican-Americans in the USA: A context-sensitive account of derogation and appropriation. Sociocultural Pragmatics. 2(2), P. 145–179.

Dalzell, T. (2018).The Routledge Dictionary of Modern American Slang and Unconventional English.

Delacoste, F., Akira, A. (1998). Sex work: Writings by Women in the Sex Industry. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Cleis Press.

Gross, R., McIlveen R. (2016). Social Psychology. Routledge.

Hall, S. (1992). The West and the Rest: Discourse to Power. Formations of Modernity S. Hall, B. Greben (eds.). Cambridge. 270–310.

Henderson, N. (2014). What President Obama gets wrong about ‘acting white’. The Washington Post, July 24, 2014. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/07/24/what-president-obama-gets-wrong-about-acting-white/

Jewell, S K. (1993). From Mammy to Miss America and Beyond: Cultural images and the shaping of US social policy. Routledge.

Kipfer, B. A., Chapman, R. A. (2007). Dictionary of American Slng. 4th ed. Harper Collins.

Lyubymova, S., Tomasevich, N., Mardarenko, O. (2018). Semantic Issues of Translating American Sociocultural Stereotypes. Advanced Education, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", 10, 149–157.

McGraw-Hill’s. (2007). Dictionary of American slang and colloquial expressions. 4th ed. (Ed.) Richard A. Spears.

Moore, T. (2018). What’s does ‘Gold Digger’ mean these days? MelMagazine. Available at: https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/whats-does-gold-digger-mean-these-days

Oakes, P., Haslam, S.A. and Turner, J.C. (1994). Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford: BiackweIls.

Pelt, V. (2017). Does the “Oreo” Stereotype Really Exist? The A&T Register. The Student News Site of North Carolina A&T State University. Available at: https://ncatregister.com/12321/the-word/does-the-oreo-stereotype-really-exist/

Rauch, J. (2013). How not to dye. Atlantic.May 2013, Vol. 311 Issue 4, P. 64-69.

Trammell, K. (2014). Student shares experiences as a sugar baby: Not all gifts, glamour. The Red & Black. The University of Georgia, Aug 21, 2014. Available at: https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/student-shares-experiences-as-a-sugar-baby-not-all-gifts/article_d862db14-28c1-11e4-97a8-001a4bcf6878.html

Thompson, I.A. (2018). Case for Technocracy in America. Fair Observer. Jun 27, 2018. Available at: https://www.fairobserver.com/politics/technocracy-america-politics-economics-us-news-42511/

Young, X. (2018). Black is Beautiful. Available at: https://loveisconfusing.com/2018/08/11/black-is-beautiful/

Published
2020-06-24
How to Cite
Любимова, С. А. (2020). Assessment Factor in Stereotyping of Sociocultural Groups in American Linguoculture. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, (91). https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2020-91-03