Specific Features of Literature Discourse and its Aspects
Abstract
The article provides insights into the nature of literature discourse and its cognitive and communicative aspects. This type of discourse is viewed as cognitive-communicative interaction between the author and the reader, taking place in certain historical and socio-cultural context and embodied in literary texts. The “author’s image” dominates in the cognitive aspect of literature discourse; in discursive perspective it is viewed as the author’s mental world presented by the author’s world image, the author’s artistic conceptosphere which result from the individual perception of the general linguocultural knowledge of a certain historic period and literary trend. A certain part of the author’s world image is the background of the concept of the literary text. The regulatory potential of the author’s world image in literature (prose) discourse implements itself by realization of discourse strategies that are instruments of regulation. In the narrator’s discourse zone the narrative strategy is the global one while in the character’s zone it is the representative strategy which represents a variety of discourse strategies employed by individuals in real communications.
Downloads
References
Ajupova, S.B. (2009). Diskurs hudozhestvennoj literatury i jazykovaja hudozhestvennaja kartina mira [Discourse of Fictional Literature and Language Artistic World Image]. Diskurs: problemy funkcionirovanija, analiza, interpretacii: mezhdunar. zaoch. nauch. konf., 20 aprelja 2009 [Proc. of the international correspondence scientific conference “Discourse: the problems of functioning, analysis, interpretation”, 20 April 2009]. Karaganda, 83–87.
Bekhta, I.A. (2010). Opovidnyi dyskurs v anhlomovnii khudozhnii prozi: typolohiia ta dynamika movlennievykh form. Avtoref. dys. dokt. filol. nauk [The Narrative Discourse in the English fictional prose: typologyand dynamics of speech forms. Dr. philol. sci. diss. synopsis]. Kyiv. 36 p. (in Ukrainian).
Bondarenko, E.V. (2014). Matrichnoe modelirovanie. Dual'nost' vremeni v anglojazychnoj kartine mira [Matrix Modeling. Duality of Time in the English-Language World Image]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina Publ.
Bondarenko, E.V., Martynjuk, A.P., Frolova, I.E, and Shevchenko, I.S. (2017). Kak narisovat' portret pticy: metodologija kognitivno-kommunikativnogo analiza jazyka: kol. monografija [How to draw a bird's portrait: the methodology of cognitive-communicative language analysis: monograph]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina Publ.
Cherkasova, I.P. (2005). Lingvokul'turnyj koncept «angel» v prostranstve hudozhestvennogo myshlenija: monografija [The Linguocultural Concept “Angel” in the Space of Artistic Thinking: monograph]. Armavir: AGPU Publ.
Dijk, Т. A. van. (1979). Cognitive Processing in Literature Discourse. Poetics Today. Vol. 1, № 1–2, 143–159.
Frolova, I.Ye. (2009). Stratehiia konfrontatsii v anhlomovnomu dyskursi: monohrafiia [Confrontation Strategy in English-Language Discourse: monograph]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina Publ.
Frolova, I.Ye. (2015). Rehuliatyvnyi potentsial stratehii konfrontatsii v anhlomovnomu dyskursi. Avtoref. diss. dokt. filol. nauk [Regulatory Potential of Confrontation Strategy in English-Language Discourse. Dr. philol. sci. diss. synopsis]. Kharkiv. 36 p. (in Ukrainian).
Gafarova, A.S. (2011). Hudozhestvennyj tekst vs hudozhestvennyj diskurs [Literary Text vs Literary Discourse]. Dialog jazykov i kul'tur: lingvisticheskie i lingvodidakticheskie aspekty: mezhdunarodnaja internet-konferecija, 1 aprelja – 15 maja 2011. [Proc. of the international internet conference “The Dialogue of Languages and Cultures: Linguistic and Linguodidactic Aspects”, 1 April – 15 May 2011]. Available at: http://rgf.tversu.ru/node/486
Guo, H. (2017). Osobennosti diskursa hudozhestvennogo proizvedenija [Specific Features of the Discourse of Work of Literature]. Molodoj ucheny.j – Young Scientist, 20(154), 483–486 (in Russian).
Issers, O.S. (2003). Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoj rechi [Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Russian Speech]. Moscow: USSR Publ.
Kolegaeva, I.M. (2008). Tekstovaja paradigma: MIKRO-, MAKRO-, MEGA-, GIPER- i prosto TEKST [Text Paradigm: MICRO-, MACRO-, MEGA-, HYPER- and just TEXT]. Zapysky z romano-hermanskoi filolohii. – Studies in Roman-Germanic Philology, 20, 70–78 (in Russian).
Kolehaieva, I.M. (2010). Zobrazhennia personazhnoho dyskursu yak zhanrovo determinovanyi vplyv komunikatyvnoi vtorynnosti v khudozhnomu teksti [Representation of personages’ discourse as a genre determined display of secondhand (reproduced) communication in belles-lettres text]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National Univ. Messenger, 896, 102–107. (in Ukrainian).
Kolesnikova, V.V. (2008). Hudozhestvennyj koncept «Dusha» i ego jazykovaja reprezentacija (na materiale proizvedenij B. Pasternaka). Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Artistic concept «soul» and its linguistic representation (using B. Pasternak's works). Cand. philol. sci. diss. synopsis]. Krasnodar. 21 p. (in Russian).
Kramsch, С. (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization. In: C. Kramsch (ed.). Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum, pp. 140–164.
Krasnyh, V.V. (2003). «Svoj» sredi «chuzhih»: mif ili real'nost'? [“One” among “Strangers”: Myth or Reality?]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ.
Kusko, K. (2001). Dyskurs inozemnomovnoi komunikatsii: kontseptualni pytannia teorii i praktyky [Discourse of Foreign Language Communication: Conceptual Issues of Theory and Practice]. In: S. Denysenko (ed.). Dyskurs inozemnomovnoi komunikatsii: kol. monohrafiia. [Discourse of Foreign Language Communication: monograph]. Lviv: Vyd-vo Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni I. Franka Publ., pp. 25–48.
Kusko, K.Ya. (2004). Kohnityvno-dyskursyvnyi potentsial informatyvnoho transferu [Cognitive-discursive Potential of Information Transfer]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National Univ. Messenger, 635, 91–94 (in Ukrainian).
Mejlah, B.S. (1983). Filosofija iskusstva i hudozhestvennaja kartina mira [Philosophy of Art and Artistic World Image]. Voprosy filosofii. – Problems of Philosophy, 7, 116–125 (in Russian).
Minihanova, L.K., and Fatkullina, F.G. (2012). Hudozhestvennaja kartina mira kak osobyj sposob otrazhenija dejstvitel'nosti [Artistic World Image as a Specific Way of Reflecting Reality]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. – Bashkir University Messenger, 17, 3(1). Available at: https://e.lanbook.com/journal/issue/290744 (in Russian).
Nikonova, V.H. (2007). Trahediina kartyna svitu v poetytsi Shekspira: monohrafiia [The Tragic Picture of the World in Shakespeare’s Poetics: monograph]. Dnipropetrovsk: DUEP Publ.
Oliz'ko, N.S. (2011). Hudozhestvennyj diskurs kak polilog avtora, chitatelja i teksta [Literature Discourse as the Polylogue of Author, Reader and Text]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Chelyabinsk State University Messenger, 33(248), 164–166 (in Russian).
Prihod'ko, A.N. (2003). Sintaksis estestvennogo jazyka v fokuse kognitivno-diskursivnoj paradigmy [Syntax of Natural Language in the Focus of Cognitive-Discursive Paradigm]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. – V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National Univ. Messenger, 609, 84–89 (in Russian).
Romanenko, O.V. (2007). Stylovi dominanty nimetskoho romantychnoho dyskursu ta yikh movna obiektyvatsiia. Dys. kand. filol. nauk [Stylistic dominants of German Romantic Discourse and their Lingual Realization. Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Zaporizhzhia. 239 p. (in Ukrainian).
Samokhina, V.O. (2012). Zhart u suchasnomu komunikatyvnomu prostori Velykoi Brytanii ta SShA: monohrafiia [Joke in the Present-Day Communicative Space of Great Britain and the USA: monograph]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina Publ.
Sedov, K.F. (2004). Diskurs i lichnost': jevoljucija kommunikativnoj kompetencii [Discourse and Personality: Evolution of Communicative Competence]. Moscow: Labirint Publ.
Selivanova, E.A. (2002). Osnovy lingvisticheskoj teorii teksta i kommunikacii [Basic of Linguistic Theory of Text and Communication]. K.: CUA «Fitosociocentr» Publ.
Skorokhodko E.F. Termin u naukovomu teksti (do stvorennia terminotsentrychnoi teorii naukovoho dyskursu) [Term in Scientific Text (towards the termocentric theory of scientific discourse)]. Kyiv: Lohos Publ.
Stilisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar' russkogo jazyka [Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian Language]. (n.d.). Available at: https://stylistics.academic.ru/92
Tarasova, I.A. (2003). Idiostil' Georgija Ivanova: kognitivnyj aspekt [Georgy Ivanov’s Ideostyle: Cognitive Aspect]. Saratov: SGU Publ.
Vinogradov, V.V. (1971). O teorii hudozhestvennoj rechi [On Theory of Literature Speech]. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola Publ.
Vydy epitetiv u anhlomovnomu khudozhnomu dyskursi [Types of Epithets in the English Language Literature Discourse]. (n.d.). Available at: https://allbest.ru/o-2c0a65625b2ac68b5d43a89421206d37.html.
