Narrative of EU heritage diplomacy in the CLIL classroom: A cognitive linguistic approach

  • Svitlana Zhabotynska Bohdan Khmelnitsky National University of Cherkasy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-6335
  • Anastasiya Velikan Bohdan Khmelnitsky National University of Cherkasy
Keywords: EU heritage diplomacy, narrative, CLIL, methodology, scaffolding, cognitive ontology

Abstract

Done from the standpoint of applied linguistics, this study demonstrates convergence of ideas and findings served by political narratology, cognitive linguistics, and CLIL methodology (Content and Language Integrated Learning), where the foreign language of instruction is English. The study shows how the topic “European Union (EU) heritage diplomacy”, important for today’s narrative space of European politics, can be taught in the CLIL classroom that uses cognitive ontologies as a scaffolding technique. The development of cognitive ontologies proposed in this enquiry grounds on the algorithmic ‘modelling grammar’ of basic propositional schemas (BPSs) defined in Semantics of Lingual Networks (Zhabotynska, 2019) – a cognitive linguistic conception focused on structuring information delivered with language. As a scaffolding device for arranging the topic “EU heritage diplomacy” taught to students of International Relations, a cognitive ontology provides this topic’s systematization and narrative cohesion, thus contributing to students’ understanding of WHAT to say. Besides, an ontological arrangement of the topic supplies rationale behind its division into educational modules and their constituents. A cognitive ontology also becomes the means for arranging phrasal sets of the authentic English expressions featuring the topic, thus facilitating acquisition of the language and enhancing students’ ‘HOW to say’ proficiency. The study argues that cognitive ontologies are not only an efficient tool of teaching, but also a useful instrument for developing students’ ability to adequately process professionally relevant content, and create coherent and cohesive narratives of this content – the skills that the modern society, immersed in information and communication flows, badly needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banirostam, T., Mirzaie, K., & Fesharaki, M. N. (2012). A conceptual model for ontology-based learning. International Journal of Research in Computer Science, 2(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7815/IJORCS.26.2012.050

Borst, W. (1997). Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse (PhD thesis, Institute for Telematica and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands).Retrieved from https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/construction-of-engineering-ontologies-for-knowledge-sharing-and-/

Chaban, N., Zhabotynska, S., & Knodt, M. (2023). What makes strategic narrative efficient: Ukraine on Russian e-news platforms. Cooperation and Conflict, 58(4), 419-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367231161272

Cinganotto, L., Benedetti, F., & Guida, M. (2019). Guidelines on CLIL methodology. Developed in the framework of the European project CLIL for STEAM Project number: 2019-1-PL01- KA201-065027. Università Telematica degli Studi. Retrieved from: https://clil4steam.pixel-online.org/files/results/Guidelines%20on%20CLIL%20Methodology.pdf

Fajardo-Dack, T., Argudo, J., C., & Abad, M. (2010). Language and teaching methodology features of CLIL in university classrooms: a research synthesis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 22(1), 40–54.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Gang, H. (2022). The Application of narrative research in international relations. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 673 2022 3rd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2022), 258–261. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362198469_The_Application_of_Narrative_Research_in_International_Relations

Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S. (2009). What is an ontology? In N. Guarino, D. Oberle, & S. Staab (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies (pp. 1–17). Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Gruber, T. R. (1993). A Translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.

Li, Z., Yang, M. C., & Ramani, K. (2009). A methodology for engineering ontology acquisition and validation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060409000092

Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879

Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual education and content and language integrated learning. International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua). Paris: University of Sorbonne.

Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: communication power and new world order. New York – London: Routledge.

Narratives and story-telling in UR theory. (n.d.). Flashcards World. Retrieved November 11, 2025, from https://flashcards.world/flashcards/sets/1cd4004d-0cfd-4b5a-a38d-f38e337d96d3/

Roberts, G. (2006). History, theory and narrative turn in IR. Review of International Studies, 34(4), 703–714. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007248

Shanks, G., Tansley, E., & Weber, R. (2003). Using ontology to validate conceptual models. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/944217.944244

Smith, B. (2003). Ontology. In L. Floridi (Ed.), Guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 155–166). Oxford: Blackwell.

Sowa, J. F. (2001). Building, sharing, and merging ontologies. Retrieved from http://www.jfsowa.com/ontology/ontoshar.htm

Studer, R., Benjamins, R., & Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2), 161–198.

Waisbord, S. (2019). The 5Ws and 1H of digital journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(3), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1545592

Zhabotynska, S. A. (2020). Types of ontologies for narrative-based concepts (a case of media narratives of COVID-19). The 3rd International Scientific-Practical Conference “Topical Problems of Romance and Germanic Philology Within the Context of Anthropocentric Paradigm”, 19–22. Kyiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j1cD6Zoy_UjWr5j-j3hkBt0hVXXqtX2T/view

Zhabotynska, S. A. (2019). Semantics of lingual networks in the Active Learner’s Combinatory Thesausus. Studia Philologica, 13, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425.2019.13.3 (in Ukrainian).

Zhabotynska, S., & Plakhotniuk, Ye. (2020). The active learner's construction-combinatory thesaurus: User-driven principles of compiling (a cognitive linguistic approach). Cognition, communication, discourse, 21, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2020-21-07

Published
2025-12-25
How to Cite
Zhabotynska, S., & Velikan, A. (2025). Narrative of EU heritage diplomacy in the CLIL classroom: A cognitive linguistic approach. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, (31), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2025-31-7

Most read articles by the same author(s)