Emotive lexicon of the political narrative: Ukraine and the West in Chinese media
Abstract
This study, done within the framework of political and cognitive linguistics, discusses emotively loaded language of political media narratives that serve as the major manipulative tool with which propaganda exerts ideological impact on the public. Among various linguistic devices employed in molding the political narrative, a conspicuous role is played by emotively loaded lexicon that is in focus of this inquiry. It aims to expose the contribution of emotively loaded words into featuring a media image of the war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February, 2022. As a result of ideological confrontation between the adversaries and between their allies, this image, targeting home audiences in Russia and Ukraine, as well as foreign audiences, is framed as either pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian, with the respective emotive assessments being mostly contrastive. Our study considers a pro-Russian image of the war shaped by the English version of The Global Times popular tabloid that belongs to Chinese state media. The dataset includes the articles depicting the Russia-Ukraine war in the context of international relations. The articles were published during June, 2022, three months after the beginning of Russia’s military assault. In the study, the analysis of emotive lexicon grounds on a cognitive ontology of the RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR image. Such ontology, defined as event-focused, allows for structuring information about the event proper and its participants. Their verbally crafted ‘portraits’ are made salient through the scope of employed emotive expressions, which facilitates priming and entrenchment of the intended biased image in the reader’s mind.
Downloads
References
Adams, T. (2008). A Review of narrative ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(2), 175-184.
Babak, A., Matychak, T., Moroz, V., Puhach, M., Minich, R., Rubak, V., & Yermolenko, V. (2017). Words and wars: Ukraine facing Kremlin propaganda. Kyiv : KIS.
Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: a critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. ARECLS, 7, 23-40.
Bourse, S. (2019). Conjuring up terror and tears: the evocative and persuasive power of loaded words in the political discourse on drug reform. Lexis, 4-13. Retrieved from: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3182
Brader, T., & Marcus, G. (2013). Emotion and political psychology. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, & J. Levy. (Eds). The Oxford handbook of political psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 165-204). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Braim, M. M. (2014). A textual analysis of hyperbole and litotes in selected English political speeches. Anbar University Journal of Language and Literature, 16, 45-83.
Bullok, A., Trombley, S., & Lawrie, A. (1999). The new Fontana dictionary of modern thought. New York : Harper Collins.
Chaban, N., Zhabotynska, S., & Chaban, A. (2019-2020). Visual and emotive: Russian e-news coverage of EU – Ukraine agreement on visa-free entry into the Schengen zone. New Zealand Slavonic Journal, 53-54, 147-172.
Chaban, N., Zhabotynska, S., & Knodt, M. (2023). What makes strategic narrative efficient: Ukraine on Russian e-news platforms. Manuscript to be published in Cooperation and Conflict.
Chang, R.-Ch., Lai, Ch.-M., Chang, K.-L., & Lin, Ch.-H. (2021). Dataset of propaganda techniques of the state-sponsored information operation of the People’s Republic of China. KDD ’21: The Second International MIS2 Workshop: Misinformation and Misbehavior Mining on the Web, Aug 15, 2021. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.07544.pdf
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
Clément, M., & Sangar, E. (Eds). (2017). Researching emotions in international relations: Methodological perspectives on the emotional turn. Cham, Switzerland : Palgrave McMillan.
Denning, S. (2005). The leader`s guide to storytelling: Mastering the art and discipline of business narrative. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Connor, R. W. (2019). When hyperbole enters politics: What can be learned from nntiquity and our Hyperbolist-In-Chief. A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 26(3), 15-32.
Drăgan, N. S. (2020). The emotional arcs of political narratives. Bulletin of the Transylvania University of Braşov, 13(62), 69-86.
Duffy, B. (2018) The perils of perceptions. London : Atlantic Book.
Dunmire, P. (2012). Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 735-751.
Dijk, T. A. van. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359-383.
Dysphemism (n.d.). Meriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dysphemism
Fadhil, Z. A. (2021). Emotive language in political discourse: A linguistic study. Multicultural Education, 7(10), 599-608.
Felt, Ch., & Riloff, E. (2020). Recognizing euphemisms and dysphemisms using sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing (pp. 136-145). Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from: https://aclanthology.org/2020.figlang-1.20.pdf
Garfinkle, A. (9 March, 2021). Stories, stereotypes and politics: America’s ethnoracial crucible. Arab Scholarship and Expertise for Peace and Security in the Middle. Retrieved 30 June, 2022, from: https://mesbar.org/stories-stereotypes-and-politics-americas-ethno-racial-crucible/
Graef, J., da Silva, R., & Lemay-Hebert, N. (2020). Narrative, political violence, and social change. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 43(6), 431-443.
Greimas, A. J., & Courtés, J. (1983). Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press.
Groth, S. (2019). Political narratives / narrations of the political: An introduction. Narrative Culture, 6(1), 1–9.
Guilleux, C. (2020). Framing the world through loaded language. Interstudia Journal, 27. Retrieved from: https://calenda.org/788308
Hayakawa, S. I., & Hayakawa, A. D. (1990). Language in thought and action, 5th ed. San Diego et al.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
Hanne, M. (2014). An introduction to the “Warring with Words” project. In M. Hanne, W. D. Crano, & J. S. Mio (Eds), Warring with words: narrative and metaphor in politics
(pp. 1-50). New York : Psychology Press.
Kittelstad, K. (n.d.). Loaded language examples. Your Dictionary. Retrieved from: https://examples.yourdictionary.com/loaded-language-examples.html
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2014). Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 292 p.
MacNeil, R. (1990). Introduction. In Hayakawa, S. I., & Hayakawa, A. D. Language in thought and action. 5th ed. (pp. vii–ix). San Diego et al. : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
McCarthy, S., & CNN’s Beijing Bureau (10 March, 2022). China's promotion of Russian disinformation indicates where its loyalties lie. CNN. Retrieved 27 June, 2022, from: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/10/china/china-russia-disinformation-campaign-ukraine-intl-dst-hnk/index.html
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: communication power and new world order. New York – London: Routledge.
Mokhlosa, W., & Mukheefb, A. A. (2020). A pragmatic study of litotes in Trump`s political speeches. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(3), 1-12.
Otis, C. L. (2020). True or false: A CIA analyst’s guide to spotting fake news. New York : Feiwel and Friends.
Paszenda, J., & Góralczyk, I. (2018). Metonymic motivation behind paragonic uses of proper names in political discourse. Linguistica Silesiana, 39, 211-235.
Patterson, M., & Monroe, K. (1998). Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315-331.
Perianova, I. (2019). A Mashup world: Hybrids, cross-overs and post-reality. Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
Schäffner, Ch., & Bassnett S. (2010). Politics, media and translation: exploring synergies. In Ch. Schäffner, & S. Bassnett (Eds), Political discourse, media and translation (pp. 1-31). Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wadi, S. I., & Ahmed, A. A. (2015). Language manipulation in media. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3(7), 16-26.
Zhabotynska, S. A. (2020). Types of ontologies for narrative-based concepts (a case of media narratives on COVID-19). Third International Conference “Current problems of the Romance and Germanic Philology in an Anthropological Perspective”. Conference proceedings. (pp. 19-20). Kyiv : Mykhailo Dragomanov National Pedagogical University.
Zhabotynska, S. A. (2022). Russia's strategic narratives on Ukraine: technologies of weaponization. In New dimensions in modern philology: An interdisciplinary approach. Conference proceedings (pp. 31-34). Kyiv: Shevchenko National University.
Zhabotynska, S., & Ryzhova, O. (2022). Ukraine and the West in pro-Russia Chinese media: A methodology for the analysis of multimodal political narratives. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 24, 115-139.
Zhabotynska, S., & Velivchenko, V. (2019). New media and strategic narratives: The Dutch referendum on Ukraine – EU Association Agreement in Ukrainian and Russian internet blogs, European Security, 28(3), 360-381.
Zhabotinskaya S. A. (2013). Imya kak tekst: kontseptualnaya set’ leksicheskogo znacheniya (analiz imeni emotsii) [Text as name: Conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion)]. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 6, 47-76.
Zhao, X., & Dong, J. (2010). Study on the features of English political euphemism and its social functions. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 118-121.
Copyright (c) 2022 Svitlana Zhabotynska, Anastasiya Brynko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
