The evolution of the English small talk: a cognitive-pragmatic analysis
Abstract
Since Malinowski defined small talk as a communicative mode – the establishment of human bonds or communion, abundant studies have supplied numerous data about its cultural contexts, social and phatic function, participants and topics of small talk, conversational routines and etiquette mores etc. Nevertheless, some aspects of small talk, both its historical and contemporary procedures, still lack clarification. Lately, the development of a new linguistic approach of cognitive pragmatics has worked out a new methodology that makes it possible to take inquiry into cognitive-intentional and social-cultural aspects of the communicative behavior of small talk. In this paper, we have worked out an integrative framework for cognitive-pragmatic analysis of small talk underpinned by the ideas of historical pragmatics. We implemented this framework in the analysis of small talk on the material of English fiction of the 17th -21st centuries elicited from the BNC database. We aimed to find out evolutionary trends of small talk in English and to describe the underlying change of English ethos, in particular, politeness principles. Our findings have revealed historically stable and variable characteristic features of small talk: the former mainly concern people’s communion as a universal value, the latter reflect procedural communication patterns and requirements of a particular community. We argue that small talk is a meta-communicative (accompanying informative communication) form of behavior that satisfies human needs for social cohesiveness; its cultural conceptualization depends upon the leading social-cultural values and changes throughout history. We hope, this study may shed light on the understanding of small talk as communicative behavior found not only in fiction but also in other contexts.
Downloads
References
Ameka, F. R., & Terkourafi, M. (2019). What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.001
Belous, A. S. (2010). Evolyuciya zhanra svetskoj besedy (small-talk) [The evolution of the genre of small talk]. Manuscript: N-Novgorod.
Bondarenko, I. V. (2018). Kharkiv linguistic school. Heritage. Alexander Potebnja. Cognition, communication, discourse, 16, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2018-16-01
Brown, P., & Levinson, S, (1988). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carston, R. (2002). Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics. Mind and Language, 17(1-2), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00192
Chen, X. (2019) “You're a nuisance!”: “Patch-up” jocular abuse in Chinese fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.015
Coupland, J. (2014). Small talk. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. (Original work published 2000). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838328
Coupland, J. (2003). Small talk: Social functions. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_1
Culpeper, J., & Kytö, M. (2000). Data in Historical Pragmatics: Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(2): 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul
Drazdauskienė, M. L. (2021). On sparing representation of culture in one novel. IALS conference “A game of theories” (Vilnus, 22-24 October, 2021). Book of abstracts, p. 12.
Drazdauskienė, M. L. (2012). The limits of implicature in the phatic use of English. Man & The Word / Zmogus Ir Zodis, 14(3), 4-10.
Manzo, F., G., (2014). Talking big about small talk: a contemporary theoretical model for phatic communication. M.A. Thesis: Mount Saint Vincent University.
Holmes, J. (2014). Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: Small talk in government departments. In Coupland, J. (Ed.), Small talk. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Holmes, J. (2003). Small talk at work: potential problems for workers with an intellectual disability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_4
Jakobson, R. (1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language. Conference on Style, Indiana University (pp. 353-357). Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Jaworski, A. (2014). Silence and small talk. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. Routledge (First published 2000).
Jucker, A. H. (2012). Changes in politeness cultures. In T. Nevalainen, & E.C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Online Publication Date: Nov 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036
Jucker, A., & Taavitsainen, I. (2000). Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
Jucker, A., & Taavitsainen, I. (Eds.) (2020). Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and linguistic approaches [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312]. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.312
Kardas, M., Kumar, A., & Epley, N. (2021). Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000281
Mak, B. C. N., & Chui, H. L. (2013). A cultural approach to small talk: A double-edged sword of sociocultural reality during socialization into the workplace. Journal of
Multicultural Discourses, 8(2), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2012.753078
Matyukhina, Y. V. (2004). Razvitie sistemy faticheskoj metakommunikacii v anglijskom diskurse XVI – XX vv. [The development of the phatic metacommunication system in the English discourse of the 16th – 20th cc.]. Unpublished candidate dissertation, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv (in Russian).
Matyukhina, Y. V. (2014). Small talk yak riznovy`d anglijs`koyi faty`chnoyi metakomunikaciyi: aspekt diaxroniyi [Small talk as a variety of phatic metacommunication: diachronic aspect]. Visnykh of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv national University. Series Philology, 1102, 65-70 (in Ukrainian).
Mullany, L. (2006). “Girls on tour”: Politeness, small talk, and gender in managerial business meetings. Journal of Politeness Research, 2(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.004
Potcheptsov, G. G. (2009). Faticheskaya metakommunikatsiya [Phatic metacommunicaton]. In I. S. Shevchenko (Ed.), Izbrannyye trudy po lingvistike [Selected Works on Linguistics] (pp. 469-475). Kharkov: Karazin University Press.
Pullin, P. (2010). Small talk, rapport, and international communicative competence. Journal of Business Communication, 47(4), 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377307
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics. Ethnolinguistic, 28, 34-61. https://doi.org/10.17951/et.2016.28.31
Shevchenko, I. (2017). Had We Never Loved So Kindly: Conceptualisation of communicative behavior. In E. Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, & O. Vorobyova (Eds.), Language – Literature – the Arts: A Cognitive-Semiotic Interface. Series: Text – meaning – context: Cracow Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture (pp. 307-320). Frankfurt-am-Mein: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b10692
Shevchenko, I. S. (2015). Sootnoshenie informativnoj i faticheskoj funkcij kak problema ekolingvistiki. [The correlation of the informational and phatic functions a problem of ecolinguistics]. Cognition, communication, discourse, 10, 114-132 (in Russin). https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2015-10-08
Schmid, H. -J. (Ed.). (2012). Cognitive pragmatics (Handbook of pragmatics 4). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215
Schneider, K. P. (2012). Appropriate behaviour across varieties of English. Journal of
Pragmatics, 44, 1022-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.015
Senft, G. (2009). Phatic communion. In G. Senft, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Culture and Language Use (pp. 226–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Published online: 25 June 2009 https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.2.20sen
Copyright (c) 2021 Iryna Shevchenko, Yuliia Matiukhina, Maria Liudvika Drazdauskienė
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
