Methodological potential of the cognitive model of the person’s spiritual being pyramid
Abstract
In this paper the authors, on the basis of a systemic approach, analyze the methodological potential of a cognitive model representing the pyramid of the person’s spiritual being. This article focuses on the main requirements for modeling cognitive processes on the plane of the individual’s spiritual being differentiated into existential, mental, transcendental spheres, and consciousness. Research results emphasize that, in the existential sphere of the individual’s spiritual being, cognitive processes are based on his/her emotional (unconscious) thinking. The mental sphere, which together with the transcendental one forms a sub-conscious psychic level, is characterized by emotional type of thinking. In the transcendental sphere, the acts of cognition are realized by means of rational thinking, while the consciousness controls the results of cognitive processes’ self-development solely on a logical basis. By synthesizing the ideas of modern most productive systemic and synergetic methods, the authors substantiate the use of a systemic approach to the formation of a universal synergetic model of the self-development of speaking-and-thinking and thinking-and-acting processes in the person’s spiritual sphere. The paper also proves practically unlimited methodological potential of the cognitive universal model of the pyramid of the individual’s spiritual being; and draws up a methodological perspective of its wider application not only in the field of linguistic, psychological and social studies, but also in historical, economic, political and other areas of knowledge that deal with the individual’s speaking-and-thinking and thinking-and-acting activities in the processes of person’s communicative, intellectual and transformative behavior.
Downloads
References
Boldyrev, N.N. (2016). Kognitivnaja lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Moscow-Berlin: Direkt-Medija Publ.
Croft, W. & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V. (2006). Lexical Concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17-4, 491-534.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Frejd, Z. (1990). Psihologija bessoznatel’nogo [Psychology of the subconscious]. Moscow: Prosveshhenie Publ.
Humeniuk, I. (2018). Prosodic organisation of static urban landscape descriptions in English prose. Edvanced Education, 10, 111-117. doi: 10. 20535/2410.
Jung, K.G. (1998). Izbrannoe [Selected works]. Minsk: OOO “Popurri” Publ.
Kalyta, A.A. & Valigura, O.R. (2010). Sinergeticheskaja koncepcija porozhdenija interferirovannoj rechi bilingvom [Synergetic conceptual idea of the interfered speech generation by a bilingual person]. Jazyki i etnokul’tury Evropy. – Languages and ethnic cultures of Europe, 205-217 (in Russian)
Kalyta, A.A. & Taranenko, L.I. (2011). Sinergetizm porozhdenija i aktualizacii fonokoncepta [Synergism of the phonoconcept generation and actualization]. Naukovі zapiski – Scientific notes, 96 (2), 213-219 (in Russian)
Kalyta, A.A. (2012). Synergetychni modeli porodzhennja fonokonceptiv v anglijs’komu movlenni [Synergetic models of the phonoconcept generation in English]. Visnyk Harkivs’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu im. V. N. Karazina. – Karazin University Journal, 1002, 106-112 (in Ukrainian)
Kalyta, A.A. & Taranenko, L.I. (2012). Kriterij urovnja aktualizacii jemocional’no-pragmaticheskogo potenciala vyskazyvanija [The criterion of the level of the utterance emotional-and-pragmatic potential]. Naukovі zapiski – Scientific notes, 105 (1), 476-484 (in Russian)
Kalyta, A.A. & Taranenko, L.I. (2012). Perceptyvna j instrumental’na ocinky emocijno-pragmatychnogo potencialu vyslovlen’ [Perceptual and instrumental evaluation of the utterance emotional-and-pragmatic potential]. Naukovyj visnyk Volyns’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrai’nky – A scientific messenger of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn national university, 24 (249), 186-191 (in Ukrainian)
Kalyta, A.A. (2013). Jenergeticheskaja teorija rechi: ee sushhnost’, sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy issledovanija [Theory of speech energetics: its essence, present day state and research perspectives]. Kognicija, kommunikacija, diskurs – Cognition, communication, discourse, 7, 33-53. DOI: 10.26565/2218-2926-2013-07-03 (in Russian)
Kalyta, A.A. & Marchenko, V.V. (2013). Variantnye modeli rechemuzykal’noj kommunikacii [Variant models of speech and music communication]. Vestnik pedagogichnskogo opyta. Nauchno-metodicheskij zhurnal. – The messenger of pedagogical experience. A scientific-and-methodological journal, 34, 23-50 (in Russian)
Kalyta, A.A. (2016). Energetika rechi [Speech energetics]. Kyiv: Kafedra Publ.
Kalyta, A.A. & Klymenyuk, O.V. (2017). Synergy of the flow of thinking. Cognition. Communication. Discourse, 15, 18-38. DOI: 10.26565/2218-2926-2017-15-02.
Karasik, V.I. (2013). Jazykovaja matritsa kul’tury [The language matrix of the culture]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ.
Klymenyuk, A.V. (2010). Znanie, poznanie, kognicija [Knowledge, learning, cognition]. Ternopol’: Pіdruchniki і posіbniki Publ.
Klymenyuk, A.V. (2017). Kognitivistika: problemy, predstavlenija i real’nost’ [Cognitive studies: problems, ideas and reality]. Naukovі zapiski. – Scientific notes, 153, 438-460 (in Russian)
Klymenyuk, O.V. (1998). Systemnyj pidhid do intensyfikacii' tehnologichnyh procesiv. [A systemic approach to intensification of technological processes]. Ternopil’: LILEJa Publ.
Klymenyuk, O.V. (2006). Tehnologija naukovogo doslidzhennja. [Technologies of scientific research]. Kyiv-Nizhyn TOV: Vydavnyctvo «Aspekt – Poligraf» Publ.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Zhenshhiny, ogon’ i opasnye veshhi: Chto kategorii jazyka govorjat nam o myshlenii. [Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury Publ.
Marchenko, V. (2017). Speech and music relations: united by prosody. VII International Congress of Experimental Phonetics “Current Trends in Experimental Phonetics” (22-24.11.2017, Madrid, Spain). Madrid: UNED, 121-124.
Marchenko, V. (2018). Emotional-and-Pragmatic Potential as the Basis for Poem-to-Music Alignment. The 2018 Nord Metrik Conference. Stockholm University (13-15 September 2018, Stockholm, Sweden). Stockholm, 8-9.
Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.). The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 211–277.
Pinker, S. (2004). Jazyk kak instinkt [The language instinct]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ.
Pryhod'ko, A.M. (2008). Koncepty i konceptosystemy v kognityvno-dyskursyvnij paradygmi lingvistyky. [Concepts and conceptual systems in the cognitive discursive paradigm of linguistics]. Zaporizhzhja: Prem’jer Publ.
Shevchenko, I.S. (2005). Meaning as discursive construal in Cognitive-Pragmatic Paradigm. New Philology, 2 (22), 182-186.
Taranenko, L.I. & Sokirskaja, O.S. (2013). Kognitivnyj mehanizm aktualizacii vyskazyvanij otkaza [A cognitive mechanism of the refusal utterances actualization]. Inostrannye jazyki: lingvisticheskie i metodicheskie aspekty – Foreign languages: linguistic and methodological aspects, 20, 254-262 (in Russian).
Taranenko, L.I. & Kutsenko, M.A. (2018). Modeli lingvokognityvnoi’ interpretacii’ osoblyvostej prosodychnogo oformlennja anglijs’kyh vyslovlen’ spivchuttja [Models of lingual-and-cognitive interpretation of the prosodic specificity of English utterances of sympathy]. Naukovi zapysky – Scientific notes, 165, 12-21 (in Ukrainian)
Taranenko, L. & Schaefer, S. (2018). Prosodic Expression of Emotional-And-Pragmatic Potential of a Spoken English Proverb. Advanced Education, 9, 169-177. DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.135094.
Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wiener, N. (1968). Kibernetika. [Cybernetics]. Moscow: Nauka Publ.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
