FEATURES OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE INTERNAL DIALOGUE
Abstract
Discourse represents one of the most complex and multifaceted levels of the linguistic system, acting as a point where various other linguistic components converge, interact, and influence each other. It is at the level of discourse that the primary functions of language - particularly cognitive and communicative processes—are activated and realized. Among the numerous aspects of discourse, the study of literary speech holds particular significance, with a focus on understanding the intricacies of internal speech, often referred to as internal dialogue. This article delves into the characteristics of internal dialogue in the English language, offering a comprehensive analysis of both the terms "internal dialogue" and "dialogue." The study examines the interaction between two distinct semantic positions within human speech: the self-directed communication of internal dialogue and its externalized form in dialogue with others. It highlights how these elements serve different cognitive and psychological functions, such as self-reflection, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. By focusing on internal dialogue, the article explores its role in revealing the psychological states of individuals, shedding light on the often-unspoken complexities of thought processes and internal conflicts. The findings emphasize that internal dialogue is not just a byproduct of consciousness, but a crucial aspect of self awareness and personal identity formation. This form of dialogue is a powerful stylistic tool, widely employed by both Ukrainian and international literary authors to provide insight into the characters’ mental landscapes. The study concludes that internal dialogue is an essential aspect of narrative structure, offering rich opportunities for exploring the depths of human consciousness and the nuanced ways in which individuals communicate with themselves. The exploration of this phenomenon further underscores its importance as a literary device that enhances both the psychological realism and emotional depth of a narrative.
Downloads
References
Beaugrande, R. A. (1991). De Linguistic Theory. The Discourse of Fundamental Works. New York. 405 p.
Chamber’s Twentieth Century Dictionary (1964). London. 1396 p.
Feuerbach, L. F. (1955). Selected Philosophical Works. Vol. 1. 430 p.
Hemingway, E. (1969). A Farewell to Arms. 320 p.
Kuchinsky, G. M. (1988). The Psychology of Inner Dialogue. Minsk. 205 p.
Kusko, E. Ya. (1980). Problems of the Language of Modern Fiction. Lviv. 206 p.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors: We Live by. London. 242 p.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (1992). London. Vol. I. A-L. 626 p. Vol. II. M-Z. 1229 p.
Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (1994). London. 1557 p.
Oakes, P. J. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford. 256 p.
Robin, M. (1992). To go to far. New York. 314 p.
Plain Belva Ramdon Winds (1985). New York. 526 p.
Shcherba, L. V. (1915). The Upper Sorbian Dialect. Petrograd. 247 p.
Sperber, D. (1995). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford. 132 p.
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York. 203 p.
The American Heritage Dictionary (1995). Boston. 1568 p.
Uhtomsky, A. A. (1978). Selected Works. Lviv. 358 pp.
Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (1996). New York. 1694 p.
