DISCOURSE IN A CONTEXT OF POLITICAL POWER RELATIONS
Abstract
The object of this research is modern political power relations. The discourse is studied in the traditions of postmodernism, including as a ‘picture of the world’, cognitive model, worldview and the limits of what is possible in the thinking and behaviour of individuals. According to the discourse theories, all objects of reality are discursive, that is, any phenomenon is inscribed in a context that gives it full meaning. All objects of the surrounding world can acquire different meanings (or identities) depending on the specific circumstances in which they are immersed. Discourse is a way of ordering reality, a mechanism for determining the values of people. The subject of power in this context is understood as a collective or individual actor who has special access to the discourse and can control it. According to Foucault’s theory, discourse can be identified with power.
This research finds that discourse is the most efficient power resource because it touches every part of a person’s existence. The paper explains the problem from both sides: as the development of political discourse theories on the one hand and as the innovative research of modern power relations in a context of discursive technologies on the other hand. The research is based on the works of M. Foucault, T. Van Dijk, L. Althusser, A. Gramsci, E. Laclau and Sh. Mouff, all of whom measured discourse in a variety of ways. Thus, in our research, we used such theoretical methods for analysis, classification and comparison.
The analysis of discourse undertaken here has extended our knowledge of political power relations. The findings in this study provide a new understanding of discourse as a cognition that actualises many questions for further investigations.
The findings may be of interest for both scholars and students who study political power in general or discourse as a picture of the world in particular.
Downloads
References
Andrushko, V. 2021. “Politychna vlada: analiz innovatsiinykh pidkhodiv (Political power: analysis of innovative approaches)”, Visnyk NIuU imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. Seriia: Filosofiia, filosofiia prava, politolohiia, sotsiolohiia 2 (49): 153-168 (in Ukrainian).
Ajdukevich, K. 1996. “Kartina mira i ponyatijny`j apparat (Picture of the world and conceptual apparatus)”, Filosofiya nauki. Vy`p. 2: Gnoseologicheskie i logiko-metodologicheskie problemy`. M.: IF RAN: 231-253 (in Russian).
Mikhalyova, O. L. 2008. Politicheskij diskurs: Speczifika manipulyativnogo vozdejstviya (Political discourse: Specifics of manipulative influence). М.: Knizhny`j dom “Librokom” (in Russian).
Rockel, Angela 2000. Submitted in fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Otago.
Sossyur, F. 1990. Zametki po obshhej lingvistike (Notes on general linguistics). M.: Izdatel`skaya gruppa «Progress» (in Russian).
Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugikh gumanitarny`kh naukakh. Opy`t filosofskogo analiza (The problem of text in linguistics, philology and other humanities. The experience of the philosophy of analysis). M.: Iskusstvo (in Russian).
Foucault, M. 2019. Power: the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. Penguin UK.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. 2014. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London : Verso.
Gurin, K. E. 2014. “Analiz diskursov kak sposob izucheniya soczial`ny`kh struktur, identichnostej i proczessov v teorii E`rnesto Laklo i Shantelya Muff. Kul`tura, lichnost`, obshhestvo v sovremennom mire: metodologiya, opy`t e`mpiricheskogo issledovaniya (Discourse analysis as a way of studying social structures, identities and processes in the theory of Ernesto Laclos and Chantelle Mouffe. Culture, personality, society in the modern world: methodology, experience of empirical research),” Yuridichna nauka: 185-192 (in Russian).
Al`tyusser, L. 2011. “Ideologiya i ideologicheskie apparaty` gosudarstva (zametki dlya issledovaniya) (Ideology and ideological apparatus of the state (notes for research),” Neprikosnovenny`j zapas. Vip. 3 URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2011/3/ideologiya-i-ideologicheskie-apparaty-gosudarstva.html (in Russian).
Ebert, T. 1985. “The Romance of Patriarchy: Ideology, Subjectivity and Postmodern Feminist Cultural theory,” Cultural Critique 10: 19-57.
Grant, J. S. 1995. Fundamental feminism: contesting the core concepts of feminist theory. New York: Resources for Feminist Research, 24(1/2).
Eagleton, T. 1988 “The Subject of Literature,” Cultural Critique: 10.
Hix, H. L. 1995. Spirits hovering over the ashes: Legacies of postmodern theory. Suny Press.
Gramshi, A. 1991. Tyuremny`e tetradi (Prison notebooks). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo. URL: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Gramshi,tetradi.pdf (in Russian).
Aronowitz, S. 1981. The Crisis in Historical Materialism: Class Politics and Culture in Marxist Theory. New York 1.
Shestov, L. 1991. “Apofeoz bespochvennosti: opy`t adogmaticheskogo my`shleniya (Apotheosis of groundlessness: the experience of adogmatic thinking)“, Direct MEDIA (in Russian).
Van Dijk, T. A. 2017. “Socio-cognitive discourse studies”. Routledge: 26-43.
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).
