SIMULATION COMPONENT OF VIRTUAL MASS POLITICAL BEHAVIOUR IN RISK SOCIETY

  • О. І. Свідерська Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandera Street, 12, Lviv, 79000, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-0559
Keywords: risk, risk society, virtual mass political behaviour, danger, post-industrial society, digital risks, cyber warfare

Abstract

The simulation component of the manifestation of virtual political behaviour in risk society is considered. It was determined that using social networks, a new reality, which serves dubbing of political life of the modern individual. An important aspect of the study is to take into account the role of virtualization of modern political behavior in a society full of risks of both man-made and natural nature, information overload, substitution of facts and post-truth. Political behaviour simulation component digital origin plays an important role in shaping not only its real manifestation, but also in the structure of political consciousness that leaves a mark on the subsequent policy actions or activity of the modern individual. Particularly dangerous is the integration of this component with a risk society in which risks are increasingly gaining enormous proportions. After all, manipulative technologies, which are conveniently used by politicians or individual government officials, have a powerful psychological impact on the consciousness of the modern individual. It is not just voters, which is constantly flowing information pile of dirt during the electoral manipulation, which is essentially situational. Rather, we are talking about an ordinary individual who in the 21st century is so imbued with false information and its constant flow that it is really difficult for him to distinguish the truth. In the end - for the individual truth has ceased to be a value. It is proved that the virtualization of political behaviour contributes to its simulation, which consists in the imaginary active participation in the political life or society. A separate component of such behaviour is the tendency of man to irrationalism, low resistance to manipulative influences on the one hand, and the active use of social networks by government elites to form appropriate political thinking and political behavior on the other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

О. І. Свідерська, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandera Street, 12, Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

Аssistant professor, Ph.D in Political Science.

References

ЛІТЕРАТУРА

Бек, У. 1994. “От индустиального общества к обществу риска”, THESIS. 5: 161-168.

Свідерська, О. 2016. “Політико-психологічні виміри детермінант політичної поведінки”, Науковий часопис НПУ імені М. П. Драгоманова 19: 89-94.

Рейд, Э. Идентичность и кибернитеческое тело. URL: http://culturca.narod.ru/Reid.htm

Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. L.: Sage Publications.

Гудмен, М. 2019. Злочини майбутнього. Х.: Ранок : Фабула.

Свідерська, О. 2017. “Теоретико-методологічні аспекти симулятивної масової політичної поведінки”, Вісник Львівського університету. Сер.: Філософсько-політологічні студії 9: 128–135

Свідерська О. 2020. “Теоретико-методологічний аналіз впливу соціальних мереж на формування політичної поведінки у сучасному суспільстві (на прикладі Facebook, Twitter, Іnstagram, WhatsApp)”, Регіональні студії. 20: 184–190.

Luhmann, N. 1991. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Бодріяр, Ж. 2004а. Симулякри і симуляція. К.: Вид-во Соломії Павличко “Основи”.

Водак, Р. 2018. Политика страха. Что значит дискурс правых популистов? Х.: Гуманитарный Центр.

Бауман, З. 2013. Плинні часи. К: Критика.

Wimmer, J., Quandt, Th. 2006. “Living in the Risk Society”, Journalism Studies, 7:2: 336-447.

Гіденс, Е. 2004. Нестимний світ: як глобалізація перетворює наше життя. К.: Альтерпрес.

Бек, У. Что такое глобализация? М.: Прогресс–Традиция, 2001.

Бодрийяр, Ж. 2013. Симулякры и симуляция. Тула.

Бодріяр, Ж. 2004b. Символічний обмін і смерть. Л.: Кальварія.

REFERENCES

Beсk, U. 1994. “From an industrial society to a risk society”, THESIS. 5: 161-168 (in Russian).

Sviderska, O. 2016. “Political and psychological dimensions of determinants of political behavior”, Scientific Journal of M. Drahomanov NPU. 19’2016: 89–94 (in Ukrainian).

Rejd, Je. Identity and Cybernetic Body URL: http://culturca.narod.ru/Reid.htm

Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. London.: Sage Publications.

Gudmen, M. 2019. Crimes of the future. Kharkiv: Ranok: Fabula (in Ukrainian).

Sviderska, O. 2017. “Theoretical and methodological aspects of simulative mass political behavior”, Visnyk of Lviv National University. Ser.: Philosophical and political studies. 9: 128–135(in Ukrainian).

Sviderska, O. 2020. “Theoretical and methodological analysis of the impact social networks have on shaping the political behavior in the modern society (using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and WhatsApp as examples)”, Regional Studies, 20: 184–190 (in Ukrainian).

Luhmann, N. 1991. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Bodriyar, Zh. 2004а. Simulacry and simulation. Kyiv: View of Solomiya Pavlichko “Foundations” (in Ukrainian).

Vodak, R. 2018. The politics of fear. What does the right-wing populist discourse mean? X.: Gumanitarnyj Centr (in Russian).

Bauman, Z. 2013. Current times. Kyiv: Kritika (in Ukrainian)

Wimmer J., Quandt Th. 2006. “Living in the Risk Society”, Journalism Studies, 7:2: 336-447.

Gidens, E. 2004 The indefinite light: the globalization of our life. Kyiv: Alterpres (in Ukrainian).

Beсk, U. 2001 What is globalization? Moskow: Progress–Tradiciya (in Russian)

Bodryjyar, Zh. 2013. Simulacra and simulation: Tula (in Russian).

Bodriyar, Zh. 2004b. Symbolic exchange and death. Lviv: Calvary (in Ukrainian).

Published
2020-07-07
How to Cite
Свідерська, О. І. (2020). SIMULATION COMPONENT OF VIRTUAL MASS POLITICAL BEHAVIOUR IN RISK SOCIETY. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 37, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2020-37-07
Section
PUBLIC POLICY AND POLITICAL COMMUNICATIONS