CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE THEORY OF MODERNIZATION IN MODERN POLITICAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Abstract
There is a need to distinguish between modernization as a theory and as a process. It is noted that modernization should also be distinguished in a broad sense (as a constant process of producing certain responses to environmental challenges) and in a narrow sense (as a process of learning models of economic, social, political and cultural development of Western society).
The content of the theory of modernization as an interdisciplinary system of views, ideas, schemes, and models of analysis is revealed, which reveals the dynamics of overcoming the backwardness of traditional societies, studies the patterns of transformation of transitional societies into modern, developed ones.
As a process, modernization is interpreted by modern science as a process of acquisition by less developed societies of a number of features characteristic of more developed societies. There are several stages in the evolution of the theory of modernization, the features of each of them are considered. The first stage (mid-1950s and 1960s) was the period of the origin and formation of the theory of modernization, the development of concrete-oriented models of socio-economic development based on it. At the second stage of modernization there was a reassessment of the ideas of the first stage, analysis of miscalculations identified in socio-political practice. It has been proved that modernization has an inverse vector. The main element on which the nature of transitional processes and transformations depends, began to be considered a socio-cultural factor. The third, modern, stage of modernization (late 1980s - early 1990s) took place in the context of the collapse of the world socialist system, when post-socialist countries tried to become on a par with developed Western countries through Westernization. There is an error in the mechanical transfer of the Western model to other countries due to disregard for the different potential of their development and the ability of developed countries to constantly improve their system. It turns out that at the present stage it is worth talking more about "post-modernization", which is based on the desire for deep understanding of various social and political actors in society, the search for new social values, the ability to compromise on fundamental political issues and more.
Downloads
References
ЛІТЕРАТУРА
Шаповаленко, М. 2007. Политическое развитие современных переходных обществ: теоретические подходы и основные тенденции. Х.: Издательство Харьковского национального университета внутренних дел.
Політична наука в Україні 1991-2016. Теоретико-методологічні засади і концептуальні підсумки вітчизняних досліджень у двох томах / ред. О. Рафальський. 2016. К.: Парламентське видавництво. Т.2
Словник політичної думки. 1993. Політологічні читання 3: 269-274.
Тадевосян, Е. 1996. Словарь-справочник по социологии и политологии. М.: Знание
Губерський, Л. 2002. Культура. Ідеологія. Особистість: Методолого-світоглядний аналіз. К.: Знання України.
Cтепико, М. 2011. Українська ідентичність: феномен і засади формування. К.: НІСД.
Горбатенко, В. 1999. Стратегія модернізації cуспільства. Україна і світ на зламі тисячоліть. К.: Академія.
Данилов, А. 1997. Переходное общество: проблемы системной трансформации. Минск.
Touraine, A. 1998. “Modernity and Cultural Specificities”, International Social Science Journal 18:448-450.
Инглхарт, Р. 1997. “Постмодерн: меняющиеся цености изменяющегося общества”, Полис 4: 8-12.
Пояркова, Т. 2015. Кризовий синдром модер-нізації незалежної України: причини виникнення та засоби подолання. Суми: Університетська книга.
REFERENCES
Shapovalenko, M. 2007. The political development of modern transition societies: theoretical approaches and main trends. Kharkov: Izdatel'stvo Har'kovskogo nacіonal'nogo universiteta vnutrennih del (in Russian).
Political Science in Ukraine 1991-2016. Theoretical and methodological principles and conceptual results of domestic research in two volumes / O. Rafalskyi. 2016. Kyiv : Parlamentske vydavnytstvo. T.2 (in Ukrainian).
Dictionary of Political Thought. 1993. Political science readings, 3: 269-274 2 (in Ukrainian)
Tadevosyan, E. 1996. Dictionary-reference book on sociology and political science. Moscow: Znanie (in Russian).
Huberskyi, L. 2002. The culture. Ideology. Specialty: Methodological-Light Analysis. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy (in Ukrainian).
Ctepyko, M. 2011. Ukrainian identity: phenomenon and principles of formation. Kyiv: NISD (in Ukrainian).
Horbatenko, V. 1999. Strategy for modernization of society. Ukraine and the world at the turn of the millennium. Kyiv: Akademiia (in Ukrainian).
Danilov, A. 1997. Transitional society: problems of systemic transformation. Minsk (in Russian).
Touraine, A. 1998. “Modernity and Cultural Specificities”, International Social Science Journal, 18:448-450.
Inglhart, R. 1997. “Postmodern: the changing values of a changing society”, Polis, 4: 8-12 (in Russian).
Poiarkova, T. 2015. Crisis syndrome of modernization of independent Ukraine: causes and means of overcoming. Sumy: Universytetska knyha (in Ukrainian).
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).