SEARCHING FOR NEW AUTHORITARISM IN THE CONDITIONS OF GEOPOLITICAL TURBULENCE
Abstract
The main factors of the growing popularity and influence of undemocratic regimes are considered. In the modern world, in the context of geopolitical turbulence, the geopolitical centers of power and actors in the adoption of global management decisions are changing. But there is a need to manage socio-political and economic processes for the stable development of society. Therefore, the conditions of chaos only strengthen the attempts to search and create fuses for the uncontrollability of the development of the political regime. Especially in the conditions of the crisis of the formal institutions of liberal democracy, a clear proof of which was the emergence of post-democracy as a phenomenon and process of evolution of «modern» democracies. Several factors reinforce this trend. First of all, the reverse wave of democratization (S. Huntington), which lasts several decades. Secondly, the crisis of American hegemony and the completion of the next cycle of political hegemony. We must add the completion of the macrohistorical cycle of the internal political development of the political system of the USA itself (A. Schlesinger) with a number of crises throughout the entire first half of 2020.
The weakening of the global hegemon resulted in the process of easternization and the emergence of new geopolitical centers (primarily, Asia, namely China with a powerful economy, which is a prerequisite for the formation of a new hegemon). The third factor is the growth of right-wing extremism and right-wing populism in countries of sustainable democracies and new democracies. The wave of populism is supported by a conservative turn in the form of legal consolidation of nationalism, the legitimation of the dominance of the collective over the individual. Another factor of destabilization is the crisis of traditional institutions of democracy, primarily political parties, party leaders who can refuse program promises and turn into lawyers of the «expression of the will of the people». Amid growing mistrust of traditional democratic institutions and the values of liberalism, there is a growing demand for leaders and institutions that can ensure the safe and stable development of society. And the actual uniqueness of the current development is the search for new forms of coexistence of authoritarian and democratic institutions within the same political regime.
Downloads
References
ЛІТЕРАТУРА
Закария, Ф. 2004. Будущее свободы: нелиберальная демократия в США и за их пределами. М.: Ладомир.
Yun-han Chu, Robert, Huang, Kai-Ping Kai-Ping, Lagos, Marta. 2020. “Mattes A Lost Decade for Third-Wave Democracies?”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 31, 2: 166-181
Бжезінський, З. 2000. Велика шахівниця. Американська першість та її стратегічні імперативи. Івано-Франківськ: Лілея-НВ.
Манн, М. 2018. Источники социальной власти Т.4. Глобализация, 1945-2011. М.: Дело РАН и ГС .
Арриги, Дж. 2006. Долгий двадцатый век: Деньги, власть и истоки нашего времени. М.: Территория будущого.
Модельски, Дж. 2005. “Эволюция глобаль-ной политики”, Полис. 3-4: 62-82, 124-141.
Jonescu, G., Gellner E. 1969. Introduction. In: Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. L.: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
Краус, Т. 2020. “Репетиция диктатуры. Вторая попытка Орбана”, Скепсис. URL: http://scepsis.net/library/id_3950.html
Вінникова, Н.. 2019. Парадокси політичних рішень в епоху постдемократії: моногр. Х.: ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна.
Dahlman, C. 2017. “New Technologies, Jobs, Growth, and Development”, The Growth Dialogue. 14: 1-7. URL: http://growthdialogue.org/growthdialog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Policy-Brief-14-Dahlman.pdf
von Beyme, Klaus. 2017. “From Post-Democracy to Neo-Democracy”, Springer.
Вятр, Е. 2017. “Сравнительный анализ старого и нового авторитаризма”, Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Социология. 4: 26-33.
Шкель, С. 2013. “Новая волна: многообразие авторитаризма в отражении современной политической науки”, Polit Book 4: 120-139.
Csaky Zselyke. 2020. Dropping the Democratic Facade. URL: http://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2020.
Даймонд, Л. 1999. “Прошла ли третья волна демократизации?”, Полис. 1: 10-26.
О’Доннелл, Г. 1994. “Делегативная демократия”, Пределы власти 2-3: 52-69. URL: http://old.russ.ru/antolog/predely/2-3/dem01.htm
Левицкий, С., Вэй, Л.А. 2018. “Подъем конкурентного авторитаризма”, Неприкосно-венный запас. 121: 29-47.
Мюллер Я.-В. 2014. Споры о демократии: Политические идеи в Европе XX века. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.
Рейтинг стран по уровню демократии. 2019. URL: https://nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/democracy.
Шкель, С.Н. 2016. “Неопатримониальные практики и устойчивость авторитарных режимов Евразии”, Полития 83: 94-107. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2016-83-4-94-107
Fisun, O. 2019. “Neopatrimonialism in post-soviet Eurasia”. In: Stubborn Structures. Reconceptualizing Post-Soviet regimes /Ed. by BalIant Magyar. Budapest-New-York: 75-96.
Нойманн, Ф.Л. 2015. Бегемот. Структура и практика национал-социализма 1933–1944. СПб.: Владимир Даль.
Линц, Х. 2018. “Тоталитарные и автори-тарные режимы”, Неприкосновенный запас. 4 (120): 16-62.
REFERENCES
Zakaria, Fareed Rafiq 2004. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. M.Ladomir (In Russian).
Yun-han Chu, Robert, Huang, Kai-Ping Kai-Ping, Lagos, Marta “Mattes A Lost Decade for Third-Wave Democracies?”, Journal of Democracy. Vol. 31. 2: 166-181.
Brzeziński, Zbigniew 2000. The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Ivano-Frankivsk: Lileya (in Ukrainian).
Mann, M. 2018 The Sources of Social Power. T.4, Moscow: Delo (in Russian)
Arrighi, G. 2006 Long twentieth century: Money, power and sources of our time. Moscow: Territoriya budushchogo (in Russian)
Modelski G. 2005. “Evolution of global policy”. Polis. 3 -4: 62–82; 124–141 (in Russian).
Jonescu G., Gellner E. 1969. “Introduction”. In: Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. L.: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
Kraus, T. “Rehearsal of dictatorship. Urban’s second reward”, Scepsis. URL: http://scepsis.net/library/id_3950.html (in Russian).
Vіnnikova, N.2019. Paradoxes of Political Decisions in the Post-Democratic Age Kh.: HNU іmenі V.N. Karazіna: monograph (in Ukrainian).
Dahlman C. 2017. New Technologies, Jobs, Growth, and Development, The Growth Dialogue. 4: 1-7. URL: http://growthdialogue.org/growthdialog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Policy-Brief-14-Dahlman.pdf
von Beyme, Klaus 2017. From Post-Democracy to Neo-Democracy. Springer.
Vyatr, Jerzy. 2017 “Comparative analysis of old and new authoritarianism”, Journal of Belarusian State University. Sociology 4: 26-33 (in Russian).
Shkel`, S. 2013. “New wave: the diversity of authoritarianism in the reflection of modern political science”, Polit Book 4: 120-139 (in Russian).
Csaky Zselyke. Dropping the Democratic Facade. URL: http://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2020.
Dajmond, L. 1999. “Has the Third Wave
of Democratization Passed?”, Polis. 1 : 10-26 (in Russian).
O’Donnell, G. 1994. “Delegative democracy”, Limits of power 2-3: 52–69. URL: http://old.russ.ru/antolog/predely/2-3/dem01. htm (in Russian).
Leviczkij S., Ve`j L.А. 2018. “The rise of competitive authoritarianism”, Еmergency store: 21: 29-47 (in Russian).
Muller Yan. 2014. The Debate about Democracy: Political Ideas in Europe of the XX Century). M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara (in Russian)
Country Ranking by Democracy URL: https://nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/democracy (in Russian).
Shkel, S 2016. “Neopatrimonial practices and the stability of authoritarian regimes of Eurasia”. Politiya. 83: 94-107. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2016-83-4-94-107 (in Russian)
Fisun, O. 2019. “Neopatrimonialism in post-soviet Eurasia”. In: Stubborn Structures. Reconceptualizing Post-Soviet regimes / Ed. by BalIant Magyar, Budapest-New-York: 75-96.
Nojmann, F.L. 2015. Hippopotamus. The structure and practice of national socialism 1933–1944. SPB.: Vladimir Dal. (in Russian)
Lincz, X. 2018. “Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes”, Еmergency store 4 (120): 16-62(in Russian).
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).