Gender stereotypes in Ukrainian education: the experience of encountering prejudices and their critical reflection through the eyes of youth

Keywords: Gender stereotypes, educational environment, critical reflection, gender segregation, youth, pupils, students

Abstract

Gender stereotypes remain an extremely relevant topic in education both in Ukraine and worldwide, contradicting the modern civilizational doctrine, which defines gender as a socially constructed, not a naturally fixed, attribute. At the formal legal level, Ukraine guarantees gender equality, directly prohibiting discrimination based on sex and guaranteeing equal access to education and the choice of specialty. However, despite the legal entrenchment of gender equality in Ukraine, gender inequality continues to exist.This manifests in significant segregation in the choice of specialties (particularly the low representation of girls in mathematical and technological fields), which clearly highlights the persistence of disparities. In fact, the latent transmission of traditional roles through the educational environment continues, limiting the realization of youth potential.
The objective of the article is to determine how pupils and students perceive gender stereotypes in the educational environment, what forms of their manifestation they observe, and to what extent they are ready for critical reflection and active defense of non-stereotypical positions.
The results of the study revealed a dual nature in the perception of stereotypes. Youth demonstrate high awareness (69%) of direct institutional pressure from teachers who encourage “gender-typical” subjects. A significant gap was recorded between the declared autonomy of choice and actual avoidance behavior (36% abandoned non-typical fields). This is explained by the high social cost that youth are forced to pay for defending their positions. Despite the powerful ideological potential (98% readiness for active opposition), only 23% are prepared for vertical confrontation with educational authorities, preferring personal example and horizontal communication. Thus, the conducted research allows for the conclusion
that the educational environment remains a key retransmitter of conservative views. The hierarchical structure of the institution is the main deterrent to realizing the values of equality, despite the high critical awareness of the youth. A systemic reform is necessary, including the mandatory improvement of teachers’ gender competence and the creation of role models.
The research results are a diagnostic basis for developing a systemic reform of the educational environment, aimed at: enhancing the gender competence of educators through mandatory training; creating a gender-sensitive environment where respectful challenge of stereotypes is welcomed; creating role models to overcome the “lack of inspiration” in non-typical fields. Further scientific research will focus on: the operationalization and quantitative measurement of the “social cost” of opposing stereotypes; the development and approbation of detailed methodological recommendations for educators, containing concrete algorithms for eliminating stereotypes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vashchenko, L. S. (2010). On compliance with gender norms in natural science textbooks for the 6th grade. Scientific Notes of the Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/107004/1/2_21.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Haidenko, V., & Predborska, A. (2024). Gender pedagogy. Kyiv: Universytetska knyha. [in Ukrainian].

Maierchyk, M., Plakhotnik, O., & Yarmanova, H. (Eds.). (2017). Gender for media: A textbook on gender theory for journalism and socio-humanitarian specialties. Kyiv: Zhurnalist Publishing House. [in Ukrainian].

Kikinezhi, O. M., Vlasov, V. S., Mahdiuk, L. B., & Ladychenko, T. V. (Eds.). (2010). Gender standards of modern education. Collection of recommendations. Part I. URL: https://gender.org.ua/images/lib/2011_gender_standards_p1.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Holovanova, T. (2023). Strategy for implementing gender equality in education as a response to the European integration of Ukraine. In L. O. Sushchenko (Ed.), Actual problems of pedagogical education: innovations,
experience and prospects (pp. 49-52). Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhzhia National University. [in Ukrainian].
Holovanova, T. P. (2022). Gender audit as a tool for ensuring gender equality in education. Materials of the VI All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference “Pedagogy of Higher Education: Experience and Development Trends” (pp. 7-9). Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhzhia National University. [in Ukrainian].

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2022). Women and men. Demographic and social statistics. Education. URL: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].

Law of Ukraine “On Education”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Isakova, N. B. (2018). Gender parity in science: Trends in the world and in Ukraine. Science and Science of Science, 2(100), 68-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/sofs2018.02.068 [in Ukrainian].

Kishchenko, N. D., & Morhun, I. O. (2022). Theoretical and historical foundations for substantiating the concept of “gender” in linguistics. Scientific Notes of the National University “Ostroh Academy”: Philology Series, 13(81), 24-26. [in Ukrainian].

Marushchenko, O. (2015). Gender stereotypes of teachers in modern Ukrainian schools: A sociological analysis. Gender Paradigm of the Educational Space, 2, 88-95. [in Ukrainian].

Nalyvaiko, L. R., & Hrytsai, I. O. (Eds.). (2018). Fundamentals of gender theory: Legal, political, philosophical, pedagogical, linguistic, and cultural principles: Monograph. Kyiv: High-Tech Press. [in Ukrainian].

Pasichnyk, I. (2012). Gender and education: Contemporary trends. Ridna Shkola, 12. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/9478/1/Pasichnyk_Gender_Ridna_Shkola_2012_1.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Slobodyan, O. (2021). Higher education and gender stereotypes: Why girls do not choose technical specialties? Kyiv: CEDOS. URL: https://cedos.org.ua/vyshha-osvita-ta-genderni-stereotypy-chomu-divchata-ne-obyrayut
tehnichni-speczialnosti/ [in Ukrainian].

Strategy for the implementation of gender equality in education until 2030. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/staticobjects/mon/sites/1/news /2023/03/16/Strateh.vprovadzh.hendern.rivn.u.sferi.osvity.do.2030.roku.16.03.2023.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Strelnyk, O. (2019). Education as a factory of meanings: From sex-role approach to gender-sensitive changes. URL: https://genderindetail.org.ua/season-topic/gender-after-euromaidan/osvita-yak-fabrika-smisliv-vidstatevo-rolovogo-pidhodu-do-genderno-chutlivih-zmin-1341286.html [in Ukrainian].

UNFPA Ukraine. (2020). How to choose a profession without prejudice: What the youth of Pryazovia think: Research results of the “Council of Women of Donetsk Region” with the NGO “Mariupol Youth Union” (63 p.). URL: https://ukraine.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/gender_u_vybori_profesiyi_16.11.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Kharchenko, S. Ya., Hryshak, S. M., & Shabaieva, N. S. (2013). Gender education and upbringing of student youth in the process of socialization: Theory and practice: Monograph. Luhansk: Taras Shevchenko National University Publishing House. [in Ukrainian].

Yakimova, A., & Rarata, O. (2025). Gender stereotypes and language: Legal and linguistic aspects. Kyiv: Higher School of Advocacy of the National Bar Association of Ukraine. URL: https://www.hsa.org.ua/blog/gendernistereotipi-ta-mova-iuridicnii-ta-lingvisticnii-aspekti [in Ukrainian].

Bem, S. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364. URL: https://openalex.org/works/ W2496080171

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge. URL: https://openalex.org/works/W4404190807

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349

Garcia, A. (2018). Gender bias in the classroom: Strategies for instructors that tackle sexism and gender bias. Teaching Innovation Projects, 8(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/tips.v8i1.6215

Halberstam, J. (2018). Masculine femininities, feminine masculinities: Power, identities and gender. URL: https://www.academia.edu/54002255

Hinka, A. (2019). Gendered expectations in education: Exploring structural inequality in the classroom. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 41, 64-78. URL: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=hjsr

Melnychenko, O. (2024). Modern high school handbook: Analysis of sexism and gender stereotype. Pedagogical Education: Theory and Practice. Psychology. Pedagogy, 41(1), 27-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/23112409.2024.414

Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. (2005). Gender bias in education: A persistent challenge. The Clearing House, 78(5), 231-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.78.5.231-238

Schwalbe, M., & Wolkomir, M. (2001). The masculine self as problem and resource in interview studies with men. Symbolic Interaction, 24(4), 497-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.4.497

Su, Q., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., & Zhang, S. (2021). A review of gender stereotypes in education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021). Atlantis Press.

Spieler, B., Oates-Indruchova, L., & Slany, W. (2019). Female students in computer science education: Understanding stereotypes, negative impacts, and positive motivation. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01190

Sholokova, O., Pavlenko, V., Honcharenko, L., & Duka, T. (2020). Effectiveness of gender education in Ukraine as the implementation of the principle of gender parity. Scientific Bulletin of Kyiv Borys Grinchenko University. Series: Pedagogy. URL: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/ eprint/39326
Published
2025-12-30
Cited
How to Cite
Shvedova, Y., & Smal, K. (2025). Gender stereotypes in Ukrainian education: the experience of encountering prejudices and their critical reflection through the eyes of youth. Scientific Notes of the Pedagogical Department, (57), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8167-2025-57-14