Multimodal metaphtonymy in internet memes: A response to Donald Trump’s mug shot on X (formerly twitter) as a case study
Abstract
This study examines multimodal metaphtonymy in memes responding to Trump’s 2023 mugshot post on his X (formerly Twitter) account, @realDonaldTrump. The author employs the methodological tools of the conceptual (multimodal) metaphor and metonymy theory to identify patterns of interaction between metaphor and metonymy in these memes. The results reveal three types of multimodal metaphtonymy: metaphtonymy with a metonymy incorporated into either the metaphoric source or target, metaphtonymy with a metonymy incorporated into both the metaphoric source and target, and metaphtonymy with a metonymic chain structuring the metaphoric source. The metaphoric target domain of these metaphtonymies is identified as TRUMP-US PRESIDENT, reflecting Trump’s status as the 45th US President, a political leader, and a candidate for the 2024 US presidency within X platform. The study provides an in-depth analysis of each identified type of multimodal metaphtonymy instantiated by metaphorical portrayals of Trump as A CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH, A TODDLER HAVING A TANTRUM, and A LIAR. The source domains of these metaphors map exclusively negative characteristics onto the TRUMP-US PRESIDENT target domain, with some features shared across several metaphoric source domains. The recurrent negative portrayals in memes create powerful and enduring images that shape public perception, contributing to a lasting tarnished image of Trump. These portrayals highlight the incongruity between Trump’s constructed image and the expectations of a US political leader, leading viewers to question his fitness for the presidency. The continuous negative portrayal undermines Trump’s credibility and reinforces the perception of his unfitness for leadership.
Downloads
References
Bondarenko, I. (2024). The stories-we-survive-by: A cognitive case study of Ukrainian war memes. ILCEA, 53. https://doi.org/10.4000/ilcea.19721 (in Ukrainian)
Бондаренко, Є. (2024). Історії, з якими ми виживаємо: когнітивне дослідження українських військових мемів. ILCEA, 53. https://doi.org/10.4000/ilcea.19721
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. London: Palgrave McMillian.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ElShami, T. H. S., Shuaibi, J. A., & Zibin, A. (2023). The Function of metaphor modality in memes on Jordanian facebook pages. Sage Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231154848
Elyamany, N. (2023). How do you meme Trump, Noah? Shaping a new memescape in the daily show with Trevor Noah (January 2016 – December 2019). International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 23(2), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.469
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forceville, C. (2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya Guijarro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp. 56–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forceville, C. (2009a). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitive framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Friedman, V. (2023, August 25). A Trump mug shot for history. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/25/style/trump-mugshot.html
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–342.
Huntington, H. E. (2016). Pepper spray cop and the American dream: Using synecdoche and metaphor to unlock internet memes’ visual political rhetoric. Communication Studies, 67(1), 77–93.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77.
Kovalenko, W. (2024, April 7). [X post]. Retrieved from https://x.com/GOP_MAGA_314159/status/1776819457488220526/
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lamerichs, N., Nguyen, D., Puerta Melguizo, M. C., Radojevic, R., & Lange-Böhmer, A. (2018). Elite male bodies: The circulation of alt-right memes and the framing of politicians on social media. Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 15(1), 180–206.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Longman Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/psychopath
Lynch, S.N. (2023, August 3). Who is Special Counsel Jack Smith in the Trump documents case? Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/newsmaker-who-is-jack-smith-special-counsel-who-brought-trump-indictment-2023-08-02/
Mahasneh, A.A., & Bashayreh, H. (2021). A semiotic translation of memes: Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia as a case study. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(4), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0096
Martynyuk, A., & Meleshchenko, O. (2019). Twitter-based multimodal metaphorical memes portraying Donald Trump. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 4(2), 128–167.
Martynyuk, A., & Meleshchenko, O. (2022). Socio-pragmatic potential of (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy in internet memes featuring Donald Trump. Metaphor and the Social World, 12(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20010.mar
Matza, M., & Epstein, K. (2023, August 25). Historic Trump mugshot released after arrest in Atlanta, Georgia. BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66612345
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge – Massachusetts – London: The MIT Press.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
O’Boyle, N. (2022). WhatsAppening Donald: The social uses of Trump memes. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(2), 458-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211004596
Pannell, R. D. (2023, September 1). [X post]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/Pannell64/status/1697360337291415746/
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Piata, A. (2016). When metaphor becomes a joke: Metaphor journeys from political ads to internet memes. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 39–56.
Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2018). Internet memes as polyvocal political participation. In D. Schill & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.), The presidency and the social media: Discourse, disruption, and digital democracy in the 2016 presidential election (pp. 285–308). New York & London: Routledge.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Díez, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A. (2011). Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29.
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Trump, D. J. (n.d.). [X account]. Retrieved from https://x.com/realDonaldTrump
WAN – Word Associations Network (n.d.). Retrieved from https://wordassociations.net/en/
Younes, A. S., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2022). Metaphors and metonymies used in memes to depict COVID-19 in Jordanian social media websites. Ampersand, 9, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100087
Copyright (c) 2024 Olga Meleshchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the journal the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
