Donbas crisis key actors: narratives and perceptions in the interviews of Ukrainian elites
Abstract
This article examines real events, their perceptions and narratives concerned with the key actors in the Donbas crisis – Ukraine, the EU/EU member states, Russia and the USA. Perceptions and narratives are traced in the texts of interviews with Ukrainian policy- and decision-makers from political, business, cultural, and civic cohorts (40 respondents). The elites were interviewed in the winter of 2016 within the framework of the Jean Monnet Network “Crisis, conflict and critical diplomacy: EU perceptions in Ukraine and Israel/Palestine” (C3EU), supported by Earsmus+ program of the European Commission. Informed by the strategic narrative theory [Miskimmon et al. 2013], the article undertakes a qualitative content analysis of the interview texts, explicating elite perceptions of the crisis in Donbas. The results spell the need for a more nuanced understanding of Ukraine’s perceptions of key actors in the ongoing conflict as well as the origin of these perceptions. Arguably, such understanding may benefit the EU’s critical diplomacy towards Ukraine and add a valuable insight to the constructive dialogue between Ukraine and the EU.
Downloads
References
Alcaro, R. (2015). West-Russia Relations in light of the Ukraine crisis. Italy, Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura, 1-92.
Alexander, Michele G., Levin S., & Henry P. J. (2005). Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology, 26 (1), 27-45.
Argyros, A. (1992). Narrative and chaos. New Literary History, 23 (3), 659-673.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image-Music-Text. London: Fontana
Boulding, K. (1959). National images and international systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution 3 (23), 120–131
Burke, K. (1974). The philosophy of literary form. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: Univ of California Press.
Crisis, Conflict and Critical Diplomacy (C3EU). (2015-2018). Retrieved from https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/ncre/research/euperceptions/c3eu-eu-perceptions-in-ukraine--and-israelpalestine-2015-18/
Cardwell, M. (1996). Dictionary of Psychology. Chicago, IL: Fitzroy Dearborn. Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordreference.com/
Dempsey, J. (19 Feb. 2015). Europe and the end of Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Carnegie Europe. Retrieved from http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=59118
European External Action Service (EEAS). EU-Ukraine relations, factsheet. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/4081/%20EU Ukraine%20relations,%20factsheet
Elgström, O., & Chaban, N. (2015) Studying External Perceptions of the EU: Conceptual and Methodological Approaches. In: Bachmann V., Müller M. (eds.). Perceptions of the EU in Eastern Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa. Europe in a global context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elgström, O., et al. (2018). Perceptions of the EU’s Role in the Ukraine-Russia and the Israel-Palestine Conflicts: A Biased Mediator? International Negotiation 23, 299–318.
English Oxford Living Dictionaries (nd). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online resource https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/perception
EUNPACK (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ukma.edu.ua/index.php/news/3744-pro-rezultaty-doslidnytskoho-proektu-eunpack
Olearchyk, R. (28 Aug 2017) Ukraine crisis will ‘cripple’ Russia-US relations, envoy warns. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/c725eb8c-89aa-11e7-8bb1-5ba57d47eff7
Freedman, L (2006). Networks, culture and narratives. The Adelphi Papers 45 (379), 11-26.
Havlik, P., et al. (2014). Economic consequences of the Ukraine conflict. Policy Notes and Reports 14: Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
Helsinki Final Act (1 Aug 1975). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act?download=true
Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell.
Jervis, R. (1989). The logic of images in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kornprobst, M. (2012). From political judgements to public justifications (and vice versa): How communities generate reasons upon which to act. European Journal of International Relations 20 (1), 192-216.
Kramar, A. (1 Apr, 2014). Russia tightens pressure on Ukraine with rise in natural gas price. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/ 2014/04/02/world/europe/russia-ukraine.html
Kremlin’s Black Book. Russian war against Ukraine (2015). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://mfa.gov.ua/mediafiles/sites/cuba/files/Kremlin_Black_Book_English_ Oct_2015_ENG.pdf
Mark, J. and Solovyov D. (4 April, 2008). Russia criticizes NATO pledge to Ukraine, Georgia. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nato-georgia-ukraine-russia/russia-criticizes-nato-pledge-to-ukraine-georgia-idUSL0315483920080404
Matveeva, A. (2016). No Moscow stooges: identity polarization and guerrilla movements in Donbass. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (1), 25-50.
Mearsheimer, J. (September/October 2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West's fault: the liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-west-s-fault
Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and new world order. New York – London: Routledge.
Miskimmon, A., et al. (2018) Strategic Narrative: 21st Century Diplomatic Statecraft. Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior, 13, 1-19
Nadelmann, E. (1990). Global prohibition regimes: The evolution of norms in international society. International Organization 44 (4), 1- 632.
Peterson, N. (18 September 2018). Ukraine rebuilds its military muscle to repel a Russian invasion. The Daily Signal. Retrieved from https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/09/18/ukraine-rebuilds-its-military-muscle-to-repel-a-russian-invasion/
Piechal, T. (2015). The war republics in the Donbas one year after the outbreak of the conflict. Centre for Eastern Sudies (OSW). Retrieved from https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2015-06-17/war-republics-donbas-one-year-after-outbreak-conflict
Pifer, S. (17 May 2017). Assessing and addressing the challenge: The case of Ukraine. The Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/the-growing-russian-military-threat-in-europe/
Pop, V. (21 March 2009). EU expanding its ‘sphere of influence’, Russia says. EU Observer. Retrieved from https://euobserver.com/foreign/27827
Prince, G. (1982). Narratology: The Form and Function of Narrative. Berlin: Mouton.
Reuters (23 Dec 2013). Russia closes $3 billion Eurobond deal for Ukraine. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-ukraine-bond-idUSBRE9BM0A120131223
Robinson, P. (2016). Russia's role in the war in Donbass, and the threat to European security. European Politics and Society 17 (4), 506-521.
Sanders, D. (7 Oct 2015). The cost of conflict in Ukraine. Defence-in-Depth. Retrieved from https://defenceindepth.co/2015/10/07/the-cost-of-conflict-in-ukraine/
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2011). Preface. A National Strategic Narrative. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1-15
Smith, N. (2015). The EU and Russia's conflicting regime preferences in Ukraine: assessing regime promotion strategies in the scope of the Ukraine crisis. European Security 24 (4), 525-540.
Strasheim, J. (2016). Power-sharing, commitment problems, and armed conflict in Ukraine. Civil Wars 18 (1), 25-44.
The Economist (23 Aug. 2018). The Azov Sea: a new flashpoint between Russia and Ukraine? Retrieved from http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?topic=Politics&Country=Russia&articleid=267062210&subtopic=Recent+developments
The Economist (27 Jan 2017). Ukraine’s conflict with Russia is also financial. The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/01/21/ukraines-conflict-with-russia-is-also-financial
Troianovski, A. (15 May 2018). Putin’s bridge to Crimea illustrates his power — and his regime’s weak spot. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putins-bridge-to-crimea-illustrates-his-power--and-his-regimes-weak-spot/2018/05/15/f42c13c4-5847-11e8-9889-07bcc1327f4b_story.html?utm_term=.374c36c7ac06
Tsygankov, A. (2015). Vladimir Putin's last stand: the sources of Russia's Ukraine policy. Post-Soviet Affairs 31 (4), 279-303.
Tynchenko, Y (8 Jul 2014) In the army now: answering many Why’s. The Ukrainian Week. Retrieved from https://ukrainianweek.com/Politics/115444
Vladimir Putin’s annual news conference (17 Dec 2015). Retrieved from http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50971
Wilson, A. (27 April, 2015). Ukraine’s Economic Pressure. European Council of Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_ukraines_economic_pressures3008
Yost, D. (2015). The Budapest Memorandum and Russia's intervention in Ukraine. International Affairs 91 (3), 505-538.
Yurgens, I. (2015). A positive stalemate for Ukraine. Survival 57 (1), 71-77.
Zahara, R. (2016). Reassessing “whose story wins:” The trajectory of identity resilience in narrative contests. International Journal of Communication 10, 4407–4438.
Authors, who publish with this journal, accept the following conditions:
The authors reserve the copyright of their work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivs License (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows other persons to freely distribute a published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to post the work in the electronic institutions' repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is given.
The journal policy allows and encourages the authors to place the manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in the institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during review procedure, as it contributes to the creation of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
