GENESIS AND EVOLUTION ОF THE POLITICAL THEOLOGY CONCEPT ОF CORPUS MYSTICUM IN MEDIEVAL THEOLOGICAL АND POLITICAL THOUGHT
Abstract
This article examines the genesis and evolution of the medieval politico-theological concept of corpus mysticum. It shows how the concept of corpus Christi became established in Christian theology under the influence of early Christian authors. Particular attention is paid to the Carolingian Eucharistic controversies of the ninth century, which contributed to a more systematic understanding of corpus Christi and led to the gradual consolidation in medieval theology of the terminological distinction between corpus verum and corpus mysticum. The article analyzes the key ideas of Paschasius Radbertus and Ratramnus of Corbie, whose positions during the Carolingian Eucharistic debates significantly influenced the later conceptualization of corpus mysticum in medieval theology.
The study also traces the impact of the eleventh-century Eucharistic crisis, which led to a terminological inversion whereby the term corpus verum increasingly came to designate the Eucharist, while corpus mysticum was gradually applied to the Church. The role of Peter Lombard in consolidating the use of corpus mysticum as a designation for the Church within scholastic and university theology is examined. It is argued that the spread of the theory of corporate bodies in the thirteenth century further contributed to the stabilization of the concept, since this theory provided a juridical framework for understanding a community as a single corporate subject.
The article also highlights the institutional and political factors that strengthened the Roman Catholic Church and encouraged the use of corpus mysticum as a designation for the Church. Particular attention is given to Thomas Aquinas, whose work played a crucial role in the systematic formulation of the theological terminology describing the three modes of Christ’s presence and in establishing corpus mysticum as a synonym for the Church.
Finally, the article demonstrates that the development of the theory of corporate bodies and the gradual centralization of royal authority in the Late Middle Ages led to important semantic transformations. The term corpus mysticum gradually lost its exclusive association with the Roman Catholic Church and came to function as a more general designation for corporate entities. As a result, a concept that originally belonged to theological discourse began to be widely used in a politico-legal sense, while the term corpus politicum increasingly replaced corpus mysticum as the preferred designation for the kingdom. The article also examines the role of medieval canonists in the processes of universalization and secularization of the concept of corpus mysticum.
Downloads
References
Plato.2000. The Republic. Translated from Ancient Greek and with commentary by Dzvinka Koval. Kyiv: Osnovy. 355 с. (in Ukrainian).
Aristotle. 2000. Politics. Translated from Ancient Greek and with an introduction by O. Kusliuk. Kyiv: Osnovy. 239 с. (in Ukrainian).
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 2019. On the Laws. On the Republic. On the Nature of the Gods. Translated from Latin by V. Lytvynov. Lviv: Apriori. 392 с. (in Ukrainian).
Saint Augustine. 2015. Essential Exposition of Psalms. Selected and Introduced by Michael Cameron, expositions and Psalms/ translation and notes by Maria Boulding, edited Translation by Boniface Ramsey. Hade Park, NY: New City Press. 514 p.
Saint Augustine.2012. The City of God. Translation by William Babcock, notes by Boniface Ramsey. Hade Park, NY: New City Press. 640 p.
de Lubak, Henry. 2007. Corpus Mysticum: The Eucharist and the Church in the Middle Ages. Translated by Gemma Simmonds with Richard Price and Christopher Stephens; edited by Laurence Paul Hemming and Susan Frank Parsons. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 360 p.
Kantorowicz, Ernst. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 624 p.
Radbertus, Paschasius.2020. ‘On the Body and the Blood of the Lord’, with the ’Letter to Fredugard’. Translation, introduction, and notes by Fr. Mark G. Vaillancourt. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. 208 p.
Ratramnus of Corbie.1838. The Book of Ratramn: The Priest and Monk of Corbey, Commonly Called Bertram, on the Body of the Lord. Oxford: John Henry Parker. URL: https://archive.org/details/BookOfRatramn/page/n7/mode/2up
Macy, Gary. 1984. The Theologies of the Eucharist in the Early Scholastic Period: A Study of the Salvific Function of the Sacrament according to the Theologians c.1080-c.1220.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 262 p.
Lombard, Peter. 2010. The Sentences: Book 4: On the Doctrine of Signs. Translated by Giulio Silano. Toronto, Ontario: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. 370 p.
Aquinas, Thomas. 2017. Summa Theologiae. URL: https://www.newadvent.org/summa/
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).