THEORIES OF DEMOCRATIC CONTROL OF ARMED FORCES AND THEIR APPLICATION DURING CONFLICT

Keywords: Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (DCAF), Societal Engagement, Institutional Oversight, Non-Institutional Oversight, Internal and External factors

Abstract

This thorough examination investigates the development and obstacles of Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) within the framework of Ukraine's persistent conflict with Russia from 2014 to 2024. The conflict, initially characterized by the annexation of Crimea and expanding into a full-scale war, highlights the imperative of combining military effectiveness with democratic responsibility, particularly in the context of hybrid warfare. Fundamental theories – Huntington’s civil-military interactions principles, Janowitz’s professionalization, Schiff’s concordance model, and Feaver’s principal-agent theory – offer essential insights for ensuring oversight during combat. These frameworks underscore the significance of civilian authority, public trust, transparency, and mutual comprehension, however encounter challenges when authoritarian inclinations or hybrid threats obscure civil-military demarcations. Ukraine's experience illustrates that including societal engagement – via civic groups, media, diaspora activity, and technological platforms – substantially improves openness and accountability. The extensive participation of civil society, especially during periods of intensified conflict, demonstrates a transition to hybrid supervisory frameworks in which societal entities enhance formal institutions, hence bolstering democratic resilience during crises. External circumstances, particularly Russia's annexation of Crimea and hybrid strategies, serve as drivers for changes aimed at strengthening military integrity and democratic supervision. These pressures expedite legislative and societal reforms focused on enhancing military openness, restructuring command hierarchies, and fostering public discourse. The Ukrainian situation illustrates how external dangers can act as both stressors and accelerators for the reinforcement of democratic principles, compelling institutions to adjust to emerging hybrid difficulties. The integration of institutional reforms and societal engagement demonstrates a comprehensive approach to civil-military interactions. Technological capabilities enable individuals to engage actively in the oversight of military actions, elevating accountability requirements above conventional models. Civil society initiatives, diaspora efforts, and technological platforms collaboratively enhance social cohesion and resilience, essential in both conflict situations and the maintenance of democratic legitimacy. This dynamic process underscores the importance of adaptive governance structures that can respond to evolving military threats while maintaining democratic standards. Moreover, international cooperation and comparative experiences offer valuable lessons for Ukraine, facilitating the adoption of best practices in civil-military relations. Ultimately, the Ukrainian case emphasizes that sustainable DCAF relies on a delicate balance between security imperatives and the preservation of civil liberties, especially in volatile geopolitical environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Taras Ivanec, General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, 5, Šilo Str., Vilnius (Lithuania)

Advisor to the Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania, PhD student of the Global Political Science Group.

References

Simpson J. 2014. Russia's Crimea plan detailed, secret and successful. BBC News. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26644082

Finer, S. E. 1976. The man on horseback: The role of the military in politics. Westview Press

Lomachinska, І. 2022. The phenomenon of military chaplaincy in the spiritual and worldview paradigm of modern Ukraine. Skhid, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2022.3(4).270045

Huntington, S. P. 1957. The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Harvard University Press

Janowitz, M. 1960. The professional soldier. Free Press.

Schiff, R. 2009. The Military and Domestic Politics: Government and the Military in New Democracies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892305

Feaver, P. D. 1996. The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces & Society 23(2)

Kahn, C. H. 1979. The art and thought of Heraclitus: An edition of the fragments with translation and commentary. Cambridge University Press. URL: http://topologicalmedialab.net/xinwei/classes/readings/Heraclitus/Heraclitus_readings_flux.pdf

Clausewitz, C. 1984. On War /M. Howard & P. Paret, Eds. & Trans. Princeton University Press. URL: https://ia801804.us.archive.org/14/items/on-war-vom-kriege-carl-von-clausewitz-howard-paret-brodie-west-morigi-repubblica/On%20War%2C%20Vom%20Kriege%2C%20Carl%20von%20Clausewitz%2C%20Howard%2C%20Paret%2C%20Brodie%2C%20West%2C%20%20Morigi%2C%20Repubblicanesimo%20Geopolitico%2C%20Neo-marxismo%2C%20Neo-marxism%2C%20Marxism%2C%20Marxismo%2C%20Neo-Republicanism%2C%20%20Antilogicalism.pdf

Stepan, A. 1988. Rethinking military politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton University Press.

O'Donnell, G. 1978. State and Alliances in Contemporary Argentina. Princeton

Bertrand, N. and Marquardt, A. 2023. US increases pressure on Ukraine to do more to counter corruption. URL: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/03/politics/us-ukraine-pressure-counter-corruption

Alperovich, D. 2022. How Russia Has Turned Ukraine Into a Cyber-Battlefield. Foreign Affairs. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2022-01-28/how-russia-has-turned-ukraine-cyber-battlefield

Mironova, V. and Whitt, S. 2019. Mobilizing civilians into high-risk forms of violent collective action. Journal of Peace Research 57(3): 1-15 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319856043

Iarmolenko, S. and Kerstetter, D. 2015. Identity, Adjustment, and Transnational Activity Patterns of Fourth-Wave Ukrainian Diaspora in the United States. Tourism Culture &Amp; Communication 15(3): 237-247 p. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830415x14483038034281

Kozachenko, I. 2021. Transformed by contested digital spaces? Social media and Ukrainian diasporic ‘selves’ in the wake of the conflict with Russia. Nations and Nationalism 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12707

Aji, A. B. and Setiyono, S. D. J. 2023. Conflict resolution between Russia and Ukraine based on an international law perspective. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis 06(12): 5934-5939 p. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i12-60

Kuzio, T. 2024. Ukrainian versus pan‐russian identities: the roots of russia's invasion of ukraine. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12422

Arel, D. and Driscoll, J. 2023. Ukraine's unnamed war. 274 р. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009052924

Bobrytska, V. I., Bobrytskyi, L. V., Bobrytskyi, A. L., & Protska, S. M. 2022. Addressing the issues in Democratic Civilian Control in Ukraine through updating the refresher course for civil servants. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.23

Poshedin, O. 2023. Democratic control of the defence sector in Ukraine. Humanitarian Vision, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.23939/shv2023.02.001

Zaborowski, W. 2016. The nature of civilian and democratic control over the armed forces. Journal of Science of the Gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, 182(4). https://doi.org/10.5604/17318157.1226140

Titarenkо, O. and Kriachko, O. 2024. Certain risks of mobilization draft laws and their possible impact on the military security of ukraine. Honor and Law: The Scientific Journal of the National Academy of National Guard 1(88). https://doi.org/10.33405/2078-7480/2024/1/88/302295

Trepanowski, R., Drążkowski, D., Burdun, P., & Bojarski, D. 2023. In times of need. Cross-country investigation of the determinants of aid allocation for ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2034774/v2

Kolås, Å. 2024. Norway’s aid to ukraine: building peace or fueling crime? Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.232

Bartusevičius, H., Leeuwen, F. v., Mazepus, H., Laustsen, L., & Tollefsen, A. F. 2023. Russia's attacks on civilians strengthen Ukrainian resistance. PNAS Nexus, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad386

Geng, K. and Xie, Z. 2019. Indicators for bsc-based assessment of integrated military-civilian logistics support. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development, ICSSED 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/icssed-19.2019.5

Shopina, I., Kobets, M.& Tarasov, S. 2021. Non-governmental control in the sphere of national security of ukraine. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Accounting, Management, Banking, Economic Security and Legal Regulatio. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210826.034

Ryan, M. 2023. The war for Ukraine: Strategy and adaptation under fire. Naval Institute Press.

Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A., Scullin, M. K., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Revealing list-level control in the stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024670

Sprinks, J., Woods, S., Parkinson, S., Wehn, U., Joyce, H., Ceccaroni, L. & Gharesifard, M. 2021. Coordinator perceptions when assessing the impact of citizen science towards sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042377

Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Ivanec, T. (2025). THEORIES OF DEMOCRATIC CONTROL OF ARMED FORCES AND THEIR APPLICATION DURING CONFLICT. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 48, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2025-48-07