FEATURES OF STRENGTHENING THE INSTITUTION OF THE PRESIDENCY IN THE MODERN SEMI-PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN UKRAINE

Keywords: semi-presidential system, premier-presidential type, president-parliamentary type, political system, client-patron networks, rent-seeking actors, institution of the presidency

Abstract

The specific features of the functioning of the modern semi-presidential system of government in Ukraine are examined. The evolution of the semi-presidential system since 1996 is traced. It is shown that in the Ukrainian political process, the president's concentration of power is influenced not only by formal powers but also by informal mechanisms. It is argued that in the political history of modern Ukraine until 2016, a significant expansion of both formal and informal presidential powers occurred under the president-parliamentary type of semi-presidential system when Presidents of Ukraine (L. Kuchma and V. Yanukovych) obtained a level of power characteristic of super-presidential systems. The fluctuations between the president-parliamentary and premier-presidential types of Ukraine’s semi-presidential system since 1996 are examined. It is observed that the process of strengthening or weakening the institution of the presidency has always been preceded by inter-elite consensus.

The phenomenon of patronage-based presidency in Ukraine is analyzed, along with the specific features of its implementation under both the president-parliamentary and premier-presidential types of the semi-presidential system.

It is demonstrated that since 2016 to the present day, there has been an atypical strengthening of the presidency in Ukraine, as the president acquires a power typical of super-presidential systems, despite the formally existing premier-presidential type of semi-presidential system.

It has been revealed that the main reason for the significant expansion of presidential powers lies in informal practices, the specific functioning of clientelistic and patronage networks, and rent-seeking actors. These elements constitute the foundation that provides support and enables a substantial increase in the actual powers of the presidency despite formal institutional constraints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleg Gaiko, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Assistant professor, PhD in Political Science.

References

Choudry, S., Sedelius, T., Kyrychenko, Y. 2018. Semi-Presidentialism and Inclusive Governance in Ukraine: Proposals for Constitutional Reform. Kyiv: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (in Ukrainian)

Shugart, M.S. 2005. Semi-presidential systems: Dual executive and mixed authority paterns, French Politics 3: 323-351.

Fisun, O. 2011. The Dual Spiral of Ukrainian Politics after 2010, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 164: 1-5 (in Ukrainian)

Gaiko, O. 2014. Transformation of the Modern Capitalism System, The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science 1132:114-119 URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/politology/article/view/1350/1109 (in Ukrainian)

Shcherbyna, S. 2012. «The family» is entering the public eye. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2012/10/11/6974428/ (in Ukrainian)

Tullock, G.1967. The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft , Western Economic Journal 5: 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967. tb01923.x

Krueger, A. O. 1974. The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society, American Economic Review 64: 291-303.

Fisun, O. 2016. Informal institutions and informal democracy in Ukraine. Agora 17: 9-13. (in Ukrainian)

Fisun, O., Movchan, U. 2023. Regime Cycles and Neopatrimonialism in Ukraine. In: B. Madlovics, B. Magyar (Eds.), Ukraine’s Patronal Democracy and the Russian Invasion: The Russia-Ukraine War. Central European University Press :119-139. URL: file:///C:/Users/intel/Downloads/2023.10.16.UkrainesPatronalDemocracyandtheRussianInvasionMadlovics-MagyarCEUPress.pdf

Hale, H. 2011. Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia, World Politics 63: 581-617.

Hale, H.E 2015. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press URL: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/73517/frontmatter/9781107073517_frontmatter.pdf

Przeworski, A. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linz, J., Stepan, A. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P.C. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Published
2025-05-25
How to Cite
Gaiko, O. (2025). FEATURES OF STRENGTHENING THE INSTITUTION OF THE PRESIDENCY IN THE MODERN SEMI-PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN UKRAINE. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 47, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2025-47-08