POLICY NETWORK THEORY IN THE STUDY OF MODERN POLITICAL PROCESSES
Abstract
In the modern globalized world, political processes increasingly occur as a result of interactions between individual actors who form networks. Contemporary political processes are examined through the lens of Policy Network Theory. This theory elucidates the essence and content of Policy Network Theory itself, highlighting the importance of studying networks in political processes and the value of network theory as a subfield of political science for developing new concepts to analyze and explain diverse political phenomena and current trends. It is noted that politicians, business structures, and civil society organizations, by uniting based on shared interests, can influence the political decision-making process no less effectively than state institutions. Networks in political processes are characterized by decentralization, close interaction, and an ever-changing structure in which resources, including financial assets, information, or simply ideas, are constantly exchanged. An illustrative example of network formation in the political process in Ukraine is the «Servant of the People» Political party. Founded on the eve of the parliamentary elections, this leading party created a network of a new political elite whose members had no prior experience in politics, but included industry experts, activists, business representatives, and cultural figures. By adopting a decentralized approach to communication and organizing support at the regional level, the party managed to build a nationwide network in a short period of time. This example illustrates how a political party can operate within the network model, uniting different social groups around a common goal and using horizontal links to effectively disseminate its ideas and implement initiatives. The study of works from the German and British schools of social network analysis leads to the conclusion that traditional approaches to analyzing political processes and explaining the dynamics of modern politics are insufficient. These approaches primarily focus on studying rules and norms, the development of structures, and institutional interactions, while overlooking more complex interconnections and their causality.
It is proposed to view the foundations of Policy Network Theory as a new approach to understanding political processes, emphasizing the critical role of connections and interdependencies among various political actors. The evolution of Policy Network Theory is traced, beginning in the 1970s with the emergence of the neo-institutional approach, and its importance for studying contemporary political processes in the context of modern transformations is substantiated.
It is suggested that political power should be viewed not as a hierarchical structure but as a network, where each node (e.g., state authorities, intergovernmental organizations, business corporations, or civil society associations) can influence the overall outcome of policy. It is suggested to adopt new terminology, previously unused in Ukrainian political science, for studying networks of political actors.
The relevance of Policy Network Theory is emphasized, and its application in future research is recommended as a tool that allows for the consideration of the broadest range of factors influencing policymaking.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Marsh, David, & Rhodes, R.A.W. 1992. Policy Networks in British Politics: A Critique of Existing Approaches. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198278528.001.0001
Daugbjerg, Carsten. 1998. Explaining Policy Outcomes: Integrating the Policy Network Approаch with Macro-Level and Micro-Level Analysis. In: David Marsh, Carsten Daugbjerg (Eds.), Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press: 52–71.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.3
Heclo, Hugh. 1978. Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In: Martin Lodge (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks: 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.28
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. United States by the University of California Press.
March, James G., & Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press (Macmillan).
Kickert, Walter J.M., & Erik-Hans Klijn, Joop F.M. Koppenjan. 1997. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217658
Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks. The Structural Perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527548
Greaves, Justin, & Wyn Grant. 2010. Underperforming policy networks: the biopesticides network in the United Kingdom. British Politics URL: https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2973/1/WRAP_Greaves_0381539-pais-210310-policy_networks_article_june_2009.pdf
Miller, Hugh, & Demir Tansu. 2007. Policy Communities. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis /ed. by Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller. New York:. CRC Press Taylor&Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093192
Damgaard, Bodil. 2006. Do Policy Networks Lead to Network Governing? Public Administration 84 (3): 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00607.x
Anderson, Christopher J. 1994. Public Policymaking: An Introduction. Boston. URL: https://studylib.net/doc/27578010/public-policymaking-an-introduction-james-e.-anderson
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).