THE PATH TO SECURITY: MODELS AND MECHANISMS FOR MAINTAINING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2024-46-02
Keywords: foreign policy, political transformation, balance of power, security, hegemony, alliances, collective security system, defense, integration, cooperation, policy theories

Abstract

Security is a central theme in international relations and modern political science, particularly given the evolving security landscape in Europe and globally. Traditional mechanisms for maintaining stability, such as the balance of power, defense alliances, and collective security, have demonstrated limitations. European integration offers a potential alternative, capable of transforming international interactions and mitigating the risk of conflict. This study aims to identify the characteristics of different security models and assess their effectiveness within the current international system. It focuses on the correlation between traditional security approaches (balance of power, defensive alliances) and newer models based on integration and international institutionalization.

The research employs a comparative analysis of international security concepts, a historical method to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches retrospectively, and a structural analysis of international security systems. An institutional approach is also utilized to assess the role of international organizations in shaping security policy.

The study reveals that traditional security mechanisms, such as defense alliances and the balance of power, remain relevant but pose significant risks, including conflict escalation and heightened security dilemma. While joining forces enhances participants' defense capabilities, forming a basis for deterrence – a key condition for avoiding aggression – these alliances can also create rivalries and instability. Collective security, despite its international legitimacy, often struggles with implementation due to a lack of unified member-state positions. The difficulty of establishing a truly universal collective security system, coupled with the prominent role of great powers in world politics, suggests a simpler system: collective action by great powers interested in maintaining the status quo, even without formal obligations to counter aggression as seen in collective defense systems. The modern international security system, anchored by the United Nations (UN), blends elements of collective security and a concert of nations (requiring unanimity among the Security Council's permanent members), incorporating functional cooperation to address conflict sources. A more effective approach to security combines traditional models with deepened interdependence. This mitigates the structural causes of conflict and fosters a new kind of international interaction. The European Union provides a successful example of this synergistic approach to security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mykola Gnatiuk, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, 2 Skovorody St., Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science.

References

REFERENCES

Börzel, Tanja A. 2023. European Integration and the War in Ukraine: Just Another Crisis? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 61(S1):14-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13550

Claude, Inis. 1988. States and the Global System: Politics, Law and Organization. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.

Fiott, Danial. 2023. In every crisis an opportunity? European Union integration in defence and the War on Ukraine, Journal of European Integration. 3 (45): 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2183395

Zwolski, Kamil. 2024. Researching European security integration. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gnatiuk, Mykola. 2022. Integration and the European Security Solution: Overcoming the Security Dilemma, Ukrainian Policymaker. 10: 18-26. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/10/3

Snyder, Craig. 1997. Regional Security Structures. In: Snyder, Craig (Eds.), Contemporary Security and Strategy. Basingstoke: Macmillan: 102-119.

Holsti, Ole R., Hopmann, P. Terrence, Sullivan, John D. 1973. Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances: Comparative Studies. New York : Wiley.

Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 4(3): 485-507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787.

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

Kupchan, Charles A., Kupchan, Clifford A. 1991. Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe, International Security. 16 (1): 114-161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539053

Charter of the United Nations. URL: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text

Woolner, David, Kimball, Warren F., Reynolds, David. 2009. FDR's World: War, Peace, and Legacies (The World of the Roosevelts). N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan

Keohane, Robert O., Nye Joseph S. 2011. Power and Interdependence. Pearson.

Ramírez, J. Martín, Biziewski, Jerzy (Eds.). 2020. Security and Defence in Europe. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12293-5

Published
2024-12-02
How to Cite
Gnatiuk, M. (2024). THE PATH TO SECURITY: MODELS AND MECHANISMS FOR MAINTAINING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 46, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2024-46-02
Issue
Vol. 46 (2024): Issues of Political Science
Section
GENERAL

Author’s copyright and licensing.

License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.

If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.

By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:

  • does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
  • has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.

The author gives the editorial board the rights to:

  • publish the article in Ukrainian (English) and distribute its printed version;
  • translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
  • distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).

The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:

  1. Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
  2. Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
  3. Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
  4. Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
  • personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
  • web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
  • non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).