THE HIERARCHY OF STATES AS A MANIFESTATION OF ASYMMETRY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Abstract
The typology and functional features of the subjects of international relations are analyzed. Approaches to the definition of «superpower», «large, medium», «small states» are revealed. States as the basic blocks of global structures are heterogeneous systems, as they have different power resources, the increase of which can cause transformations in the structure of international relations and increase asymmetry. It is noted that the relations between the states - participants of the international communication are not isolated from each other, but depend on the degree of hierarchy and interest in each other.
The hierarchy of political subjects in the system of international relations is considered: superpowers, large, medium, small states, each of which has its own parameters that can be extrapolated to any country to determine its place in this hierarchy and the level of asymmetry. At the top of the global hierarchy of power, according to the criteria of power, the level of global influence on international processes is a superpower, whose relations with lower-ranking states will be exclusively asymmetric. It is indicated that the traditional parameters of a «great power» are military, economic, intellectual, cultural, scientific and technical potential, which contribute to the formation of relations with medium and small states in an asymmetric format.
It is noted that an important element of international policy remains the middle states, which usually belong to the group of influential states of the second level. A small state in political discourse is viewed through the prism of small power, which logically fits into the understanding of a small state. The ratio of power potentials, distribution of power and influence between states as the main elements of the international system is revealed. It was found that the asymmetry of power resources and features of strategic culture between states is a characteristic feature of modern international relations. The principles of asymmetry can be traced between states of different levels of hierarchy. It is noted that the asymmetry-oriented approach contributes to the study of the dynamics of differences between states. Relations between states of different types determine modern international politics, in addition, the vast majority of relations, being asymmetric, are not confrontational.
Downloads
References
Evans, G., Newnham, J. 1998. Dictionary of International Relations. London: Penguin Books.
Nossal, K. 1999. “Lonely Superpower or Unapologetic Hyperpower? Analyzing American Power in the post–Cold War Era”, Biennial meeting, South African Political Studies Association 29 June – 2 July.
Womack, B. 2004. “Asymmetry Theory and China’s Concept of Multipolarity”, Journal of Contemporary China 13(39), May. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ed61/fecb11d32e3eda43377b76c31d4799483056.pdf
Buzan, B. 2004. The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity.
Brzezinski, Z. 2012. Strategic Vision: America & the Crisis of Global Power by. N.Y.: Basic Books
Brooks, S. G., Wohlforth, W. C. 2016. “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position”, International Security 40 (3): 7-53.
Waltz, K. 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security 18 (2): 44–79.
Stephens, P. 2014. “What Xi and Putin really think about the west”, Financial Times. 6.07. URL: https://ekd.me/2014/06/putin-xi-west/
Holbraad, C. 1984. Middle Powers in International Politics. London: Macmillan.
Chapnick, А. 1999. “The Canadian middle power”, Canadian Journal of Foreign Policy 7 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.1999.9673212
Womack, B. 2008. “China as a normative foreign policy actor”, Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? Centre for European Policy Studies: 265-299.
Thorhallsson, B., Steinsson, S. 24 May 2017. “Small State Foreign Policy”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics: 1-25.
Long, T. 2017. “It’s not the size, it’s the relationship: from «small states» to asymmetry”, International Politics 54 (2): 144-160.
Neumann I., Gstöhl S. 2004.“Lilliputians in Gulliver's World? Small States in International Relations”, Centre for Small State Studies University of Iceland: 1–28.
Vital, D. 1967. The Inequality of States: A Study of Small Power in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fox, A. B. 1959. The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War Two. University of Chicago Press.
Alesina, A., Spolaore, E. 2003. The size of nations.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Easterly, W., Kraay A. 2000. “Small states, small problems? Income, growth, and volatility in small states”, World Development 28 (11): 2013-2027.
Womack, B. 2001. “How size matters: The United States, China and asymmetry”, Journal of Strategic Studies. 24 (4). URL: www.people.virginia.edu/~bw9c/Publications/ArticlesandChapters/2001a.pdf
Womack, B. 2016. Asymmetry and International Relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).
