INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING AND ARCHITECTONICS OF POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INSTITUTIONS

Keywords: institution building, architectonics of political and administrative institutions, formal / informal institutions, modernization

Abstract

In the process of modernization, based on the development of the potential of public administration and the growth of social capital, an open type of interaction between the state and society is formed, where institutions act as the necessary conductors of direct and reverse signals within the framework of a flexible political and administrative system.

It is pointed out that institution building in order to minimize the risks of falling into institutional traps should take into account the peculiarity of the institutional architecture, which is determined by the hierarchy of formal rules, and provide for the complication of the procedure for changing institutions as their rank grows. Taking into account the hierarchy of rules makes it possible to track the change in the role of formal / informal institutions, when a decrease in the level of the rules of the institutional architecture increases the importance of informal institutions in the management process.

It is argued that informal norms play a large role in the functioning of the political market. The state as a subject of management is interested in the formalization of emerging informal practices. The stability and predictability of managerial influences grow when formal institutions absorb informal ones. Two ways of changing the architecture of institutions as a result of such a takeover are considered. The first, administrative-legal way: the gradual consolidation of informal practices as generally recognized in formal institutions, that is, the legalization of informal restrictions.The second way consists naturally in the conditions of a low level of the political and administrative potential of the state: informal practices are embedded in the mechanism of action of formal institutions and destroy them from the inside, creating the effect of subversive institutions, which creates favorable conditions for institutional traps on the way to the formation of political and administrative institutions of modernization. In addition, a situation is possible when formal and informal rules and norms interact as independent (autonomous) entities, and then, as a result, a certain type of institutional environment is formed, which differs in the way of interaction between formal and informal institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pavlo Bozhko, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD student, Department of  Political Science.

References

Kupryashin, G.L. 2012. “Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye posredstvom institutsional'nykh izmeneniy (Governance through Institutional Change)”, Policy Studies 6: 112-125 (in Russian).

March, J.C. and Olsen, J.P. 2006. “Elaborating the “New Institutionalism””, The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford Handbooks of Political Science). N.Y., P. 3: 35-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0001

Ostrom, E. 2010. Upravlyaya obshchim: evolyutsiya institutov kollektivnoy deyatel'nosti (Managing the Common: The Evolution of Institutions of Collective Action). M.: IRISEN (in Russian).

Huntington, S. 2004. Politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchikhsya obshchestvakh (Political Order in Changing Societies). M.: Progress-Tradition (in Russian).Patrushev, S.V. 2011. “Institutsional'naya politologiya v rossiyskoy perspective (Institutional Political Science in a Russian Perspective)”, Political Conceptology: Journal of Metadisciplinary Research 4: 142-148 (in Russian).

Oleinik, A.N. 2002. Institutsional'naya ekonomika (Institutional Economics). M.: INFRA-M (in Russian).

Nort, D. 1997. Instituty, institutsional'nyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovaniye ekonomiki (Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance). M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi "Nachala" URL:

http://cee-moscow.com/doc/izd/North.pdf (in Russian).

Knight, J. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Roland, G. 2004. “Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and SlowMoving Institution,” Studies in Comparative International Development 38(4): 109-131.

Gelman, V.YА. 2003. “Institutsional'noye stroitel'stvo i neformal'nyye instituty v sovremennoy rossiyskoy politike (Institution Building and Informal Institutions in Contemporary Russian Politics),” Political Studies 4: 6-25 (in Russian).

Merkel, W., Croissant, A. 2002. “Formal'nyye i neformal'nyye instituty v defektnykh demokratiyakh (Formal and Informal Institutions in Defective Democracies),” Political Studies 2: 20-24 (in Russian).

Fisun, О. 2016. “Neformalʹni instytuty ta neopatrymonialʹna demokratiya v Ukrayini (Informal institutions and neo-patrimonial democracy in Ukraine)”, Agora. Issue 17: 9-13 (in Ukrainian).

Auzan A.A. 2007. ““Koleya” Rossiyskoy modernizatsii (The Track of Russian Modernization)”. Social Sciences and Modernity. 6: 54-60 (in Russian).

Published
2021-07-10
How to Cite
Bozhko, P. (2021). INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING AND ARCHITECTONICS OF POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INSTITUTIONS. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 39, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2021-39-02
Section
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES