HOW OPEN LIST PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION WORKS IN THE 2020 LOCAL ELECTIONS AT KHARKIV REGION?
Abstract
The article examines the first approbation of the Electoral Code on the material of the 2020 local elections in the Kharkiv region. The authors pay special attention to the effects of open lists systems and the degree of influence of preferential votes on the personal distribution of seats in local councils. The article calculates the percentage of voters who used the right of preferential votes in all 14 constituencies and main party lists. We argue that according to the indicators of the use of the preferential vote right and the percentage of invalid ballots, the voters of the Kharkiv region demonstrated a high degree of adaptive readiness for the new electoral system.
The article analyzes the effects of blocking mechanisms incorporated in the electoral system, which reduced the influence of preferential votes of voters and retained the control of the party leadership over the personal distribution of mandates in the councils. The ratio between the seats from the district lists and the unified closed party lists was quantified (based on election results for the regional council and 17 city councils of the region). The article analyzes the intensity of changes in the ballot position of candidates in the district lists on regional council elections. We demonstrate that only 20% of seats were received by candidates placed by the party leadership in a “no-pass” ballot position. The article argues that the electoral formula introduced in the 2020 local elections did not work as a system with open lists proportional representation. According to the statistics of the personal allocation of seats in the newly elected councils, this model seems to be something in between the systems of flexible and closed lists. In this regard, the article develops new arguments in the debate on how the norms of electoral legislation reduce the role of preferential votes of voters and proposes recommendations for amending the Electoral Code.
Downloads
References
ЛІТЕРАТУРА
Gendźwiłł, Adam & Raciborski, Jacek. 2014. “Jak głosują wyborcy w warunkach preferencyjnych list wyborczych: przypadek Polski,” Decyzje. 22: 47-69.
Thijssen, Peter, Wauters, Bram & van Erkel, Patrick. 2018. “Preferential voting in local versus national elections: the role of proximity revisited,” URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322759407_Preferential_voting_in_local_versus_national_elections_the_role_of_proximity_revisited
Däubler, Thomas. 2020. “Do More Flexible Lists Increase the Take-up of Preference Voting?” Electoral Studies. 68 (December): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102232
Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten & Ricne, Johanna. 2016. “The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions,” American Political Science Review. 110(3): 559-578.
Обсерваторія демократії. 2020. Випробування Виборчим Кодексом: аналіз результатів місцевих виборів у Харківському регіоні / Аналітичний Центр “Обсерваторія демократії”. Харків. URL: http://od.org.ua/uk/дослідження-випробування-виборчим
Офіційний вебсайт Центральної Виборчої Комісії.2020.URL: https://cvk.gov.ua/vibory_category/mistsevi-vibori. html
Бойко, Назар. 2020. “Наскільки відкритими виявилися “відкриті списки»?”. Вокс Україна. 2 грудня. URL: https://voxukraine.org/naskilki-vidkritimi-viyavilis-vidkriti-spiski/
Masterman, C.J. 1964. “The Effect of the “Donkey Voting” on the House of Representatives,” Australian Journal of Politics and History. X(2): 221-225.
Faas, Thorsten & Schoen, Harald. 2006. “The Importance of Being First: Effects of Candidates' List Positions in the 2003 Bavarian State Election,” Electoral Studies. 25(1): 91-102.
Фісун, Олександр. 2016. “Неформальні інститути та неопатримоніальна демократія в Україні”, Агора. Вип.17: 9-13. URL: https://academia.edu/30425284/Неформальні_інститути_та_неопатримоніальна_демократія_в_Україні_Informal_Institutions_and_Ukraine_s_Neopatrimonial_Democracy_
REFERENCES
Gendźwiłł, Adam & Raciborski, Jacek. 2014. “Jak głosują wyborcy w warunkach preferencyjnych list wyborczych: przypadek Polski (How Do Voters Use Preferential Vote in Semi-Open PR System – The Case Of Poland),” Decyzje. 22: 47-69 (in Polish).
Thijssen, Peter, Wauters, Bram & van Erkel, Patrick. 2018. “Preferential voting in local versus national elections: the role of proximity revisited,” URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322759407_Preferential_voting_in_local_versus_national_elections_the_role_of_proximity_revisited
Däubler, Thomas. 2020. “Do More Flexible Lists Increase the Take-up of Preference Voting?” Electoral Studies. 68 (December): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102232
Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten & Ricne, Johanna. 2016. “The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions,” American Political Science Review. 110(3): 559-578.
Observatory of Democracy. 2020. The Examining of Electoral Code: Analysis of the Results of Local Elections in the Kharkiv Region / Analytical Center the Observatory of Democracy. Kharkiv. URL:
http://od.org.ua/uk/дослідження-випробування-виборчим (in Ukrainian).
Official Website of Central Election Commission of Ukraine. 2020. URL: https://cvk.gov.ua/vibory_category/mistsevi-vibori. html (in Ukrainian).
Boyko, Nazar. 2020. “Naskilʹky vidkrytymy vyyavylysya “vidkryti spysky”? (How open were the "open lists"?)”. Vox Ukraine. 2 December. URL: https://voxukraine.org/naskilki-vidkritimi-viyavilis-vidkriti-spiski/ (in Ukrainian).
Masterman, C.J. 1964. “The Effect of the “Donkey Voting” on the House of Representatives,” Australian Journal of Politics and History. X(2): 221-225.
Faas, Thorsten & Schoen, Harald. 2006. “The Importance of Being First: Effects of Candidates' List Positions in the 2003 Bavarian State Election,” Electoral Studies. 25(1): 91-102.
Fisun, Oleksandr. 2016. “Neformalʹni instytuty ta neopatrymonialʹna demokratiya v Ukrayini (Informal Institutions and Ukraine’s Neopatrimonial Democracy),” Agora. 17: 9-13. URL: https://academia.edu/30425284/Неформальні_інститути_та_неопатримоніальна_демократія_в_Україні_Informal_Institutions_and_Ukraine_s_Neopatrimonial_Democracy_ (in Ukrainian).
Author’s copyright and licensing.
License Terms: Authors retain copyright and also grant the Journal the right to publish original scientific articles that contain research results and are not under consideration for publication in other issues. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY, which allows others to distribute their work with the copyright of this work and recognition of the first publication in this Journal.
If the article is taken for publishing in The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University. “Political Science Issues”, the author must sign a copyright transfer agreement. The agreement is sent by post (original document) or by e-mail (scanned copy of the document) to the Editorial Board of the Journal.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not violate the copyrights of other people or organizations;
- has not been previously published in other issues and has not been given for publishing to other issues.
The author gives the editorial board the rights to:
- publish the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) and distribute its printed version;
- translate the article into English (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian) and distribute the printed version of the translation;
- distribute the electronic version of the article, as well as the electronic version of the English-language translation of the article (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), through any electronic means (placing on the official journal web site, in electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and the founders to:
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for educational purposes.
- Completely or partly use the materials of the article for writing own theses.
- Use the materials of the article to prepare abstracts, conference reports, and oral presentations.
- Post electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic version downloaded from the journal's official website) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web sites, web pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit, open-source web resources (such as arXiv.org).