Model of formation of design competence of future engineer-teachers under the conditions of pedagogical practice
Abstract
The contemporary modernization of vocational education in Ukraine, driven by digital transformation, European integration processes, changes in the labor market, and the need to train competitive specialists, has brought the issue of developing design competence in future engineer-teachers to the forefront. This issue becomes particularly significant in the context of teaching practice, where the theoretical, methodological, research, and professional-technological components of students’ training are integrated.
The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical substantiation, substantive elaboration, and structural functional modeling of the process of developing design competence in future engineer-teachers during teaching practice. The logic of the study builds upon the author’s previous research, in which the essence of the concept of “design competence of an engineer-teacher” was clarified and the specific features of its development in practical training were outlined. The research design was defined as a theoretical study with elements of a structured literature review and conceptual modeling; the research procedure included the selection of sources, their analytical grouping, and the synthesis of the structural elements of the model. It is substantiated that the contemporary training of engineer-teachers requires the purposeful development of design competence as an integrative quality that ensures the future specialist’s ability to design, implement, adjust, and evaluate pedagogical as well as professional-technological solutions. An analytical review of Ukrainian and international sources revealed a scholarly gap in modeling specifically the dual nature of the engineer-teacher’s design competence, that is, its pedagogical and engineering technological dimensions, within the framework of teaching practice. The findings demonstrated that the development of design competence in future engineer-teachers should be understood as a holistic, stage-by-stage organized process aimed at fostering motivational-value, cognitive, operational-activity, and reflective-evaluative components. A structural-functional model was developed, consisting of the following interrelated blocks: social demand, target block, content block, procedural block, organizational conditions, resultative block, and levels of development. For each block, its content, functions, and logic of interaction were specified. The criteria and indicators of design competence development were outlined, and four levels of its advancement were characterized: situational-intuitive, normative-reproductive, active-search, and creative-intellectual. It was demonstrated that teaching practice is not only a space for testing previously acquired knowledge and skills, but also the leading environment for integrating the pedagogical, engineering, and research experience of future engineer-teachers. The proposed model ensures the systemic nature of professional training, the последовательность? Wait need English: consistency/sequential progression of increasing complexity of design tasks, an enhanced level of student agency, and an orientation toward a reflective-evaluative outcome.
Downloads
References
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2014). Pro vyshchu osvitu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 01.07.2014 № 1556-VII [On higher education: Law of Ukraine dated July 1, 2014 No. 1556-VII]. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» [Database «Legislation of Ukraine»]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1556-18 [in Ukrainian]
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2017). Pro osvitu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.09.2017 № 2145-VIII [On education: Law of Ukraine dated September 5, 2017 No. 2145-VIII]. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» [Database «Legislation of Ukraine»]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/2145-19 [in Ukrainian]
Volkova, N. V. (2022). Pidhotovka maibutnikh inzheneriv-pedahohiv haluzi kharchovykh tekhnolohii do vykorystannia pedahohichnoho dyzainu u profesiinii diialnosti [Training of future engineer-teachers in the field of food technologies for the use of pedagogical design in professional activities]. Profesiina osvita: metodolohiia, teoriia ta tekhnolohii [Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies], 15, 52–69. https://doi.org/10.31470/2415-3729-2022-15-52-69 [in Ukrainian]
Instytut profesiinoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. (2022). Profesiinyi standart «Pedahoh profesiinoho navchannia»: nakaz Instytutu profesiinoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy vid 29.12.2022 № 38-OD [Professional standard «Vocational education teacher»: Order of the Institute of Vocational Education of the NAES of Ukraine dated December 29, 2022 No. 38-OD]. https://register.nqa.gov.ua/uploads/0/521-pedagog_profesijnogo_navcanna.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Konovalchuk, I. M., Vyshnivska, N. V., Proshkuratova, T. S., & Predyk, A. A. (2025). Potentsial vyrobnychoi praktyky u formuvanni kompetentnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv pochatkovykh klasiv do provedennia pedahohichnykh doslidzhen [The potential of industrial practice in forming the competence of future primary school teachers for conducting pedagogical research]. Visnyk nauky ta osvity [Bulletin of Science and Education], 9(39), 1240-1254. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6165-2025-9(39)-1240-1254 [in Ukrainian]
Kovalenko, O., Briukhanova, N., & Korolova, N. (2018). Vybir tekhnolohii navchannia yak skladova pedahohichnoho proektuvannia profesiinoi pidhotovky kompetentnykh inzheneriv-pedahohiv [Selection of teaching technologies as a component of pedagogical design of professional training of competent engineer-teachers]. Molod i rynok [Youth and Market], 5(160), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4634.2018.133872 [in Ukrainian]
Korolova, N. V., Bilotserkivska, Yu. O., & Mukhin, O. Ye. (2024). Analiz proiektuvalnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh inzheneriv-pedahohiv [Analysis of design competence of future engineer-teachers]. Problemy inzhenernopedahohichnoi osvity [Problems of Engineering and Pedagogical Education], 83, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8922-2024-83-14 [in Ukrainian]
Lytvyn, O. (2022). Features of training future engineer-educators for the implementation of information technologies in education on the basis of pedagogical design. Adaptyvne upravlinnia: teoriia i praktyka. Seriia Pedahohika [Adaptive Management: Theory and Practice. Series Pedagogy], 13(25). https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-025513(25)-15
Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. (2019). Standart vyshchoi osvity za spetsialnistiu 015 Profesiina osvita (za spetsializatsiiamy) dlia pershoho (bakalavrskoho) rivnia vyshchoi osvity: nakaz MON Ukrainy vid 21.11.2019 № 1460 [Higher education standard for specialty 015 Professional education (by specializations) for the first (bachelor’s) level of higher education: Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated November 21, 2019 No. 1460]. https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/vishcha-osvita/zatverdzeni%20
standarty/2021/07/28/015-Profosvita-bakalavr.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Mukhin, O. Ye. (2025). Osoblyvosti formuvannia proiektuvalnoi kompetentnosti u maibutnikh inzheneriv-pedahohiv v umovakh pedahohichnoi praktyky [Peculiarities of forming design competence in future engineer-teachers under the conditions of pedagogical practice]. Pedahohichna akademiia: naukovi zapysky [Pedagogical Academy: Scientific Notes], 18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15768614 [in Ukrainian]
Portian, M. O. (2019). Formuvannia proektuvalnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv pochatkovoi shkoly i vykhovateliv zakladiv doshkilnoi osvity [Formation of design competence of future primary school teachers and educators of preschool education institutions]. Teoriia ta metodyka navchannia ta vykhovannia [Theory and Methods of Teaching and Education], 46, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.34142/23128046.2019.46.08 [in Ukrainian]
Savchenko, V. (2023). Formuvannia praktychnykh umin maibutnikh uchyteliv tekhnolohii u zakladakh vyshchoi osvity [Formation of practical skills of future technology teachers in higher education institutions]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu [Collection of Scientific Papers of Uman State Pedagogical University], 4, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.31499/2307-4906.4.2023.295471 [in Ukrainian]
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Levina, I. (2016). The model of future teachers’ project competence formation in the process of professional training. Science and Education, 10, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2016-10-6
Lin, K.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., Hsu, Y.-T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
Miller, E. C., Severance, S., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Motivating teaching, sustaining change in practice: Design principles for teacher learning in project-based learning contexts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(7), 757–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1864099
Ozbaş, M,. Mukhatayeva, D. (2018) Views of pre-service teachers related to the development of teaching design competences. Universal Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 6, No. 6. P. 1112–1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060611
Tempera T., Tinoca L. (2023) Project-Based Learning in Initial Teacher Education: The Practice of Three Higher Education Institutions in Portugal. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 13, No. 2. P. 57–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1141
Uyen, B., Tong, D., Ngan, L. (2024) Online project-based learning for teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology. Vol. 15, No. 3. Article ep433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13238
Vnukova, O., Udalova, O., Velychko, V. (2022) Competence in pedagogical design in the training of pedagogical engineers. New pedagogical thought. No. 96. P. 192–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52256/2710-3560.2022.96.28