International responsibility of states (theoretical and legal view)
Abstract
Introduction. This article examines the theoretical and legal possibility of bringing legal relations of a public nature to the international legal responsibility of the participating state, in order to determine the actual mechanisms for the implementation of influence measures and the types of legal consequences that apply to the guarantor state of international legal norms, by analyzing the views of scientists on the issue responsibility of states, their types, the legal framework of an international nature, which regulates the issue of the mechanism and means of influence on the state.
Summary of the main research results. First, the quintessence of the axiology of responsibility as a legal phenomenon and its place in international legal relations is emphasized. Also, on the basis of the study of the views of scientists, the differentiation of international responsibility was determined. Several of its types have been identified. The first type of responsibility, which occurs in cases of illegal actions in the form of violation of contractual obligations, the second type of compliance, which occurs for the commission of international crimes. Emphasis is placed on the legal regulation of responsibility for illegal acts in the field of legal obligations. The main international normative acts regulating the procedure of bringing to responsibility, ensuring peace and security in the foreign space have been analyzed. The international practice that reveals the cases of bringing to international responsibility on the example of states that participated in legal relations in violation of international legal norms is given.
Conclusions. According to the results of the study, the duality of approaches to the responsibility of states was established. Conclusions were made regarding the prospects and realities of bringing the state to international legal responsibility.
Downloads
References
/References
Grotius, H. The right of war and peace. Indiana: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2005. 362 p. URL: https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/2637/Grotius_RightsWarPeace1625.pdf (дата звернення: 26.06.2023).
Ежегодник Комиссии международного права. URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/russian/ilc_2009_v1.pdf (дата звернення: 26.06.2023).
Буроменський М. В. Міжнародне право : навчальний посібник. Київ : Юрінком Інтер, 2006. 336 с.
Shaw Malcolm N. International Law. 5th Edition. Cambridge. Cambridge : University Press, 2003. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/international-law-by-malcolm-n-shaw-cambridge-cambridge-university-press-2003-5th-edition-xxicxlv1288-pp-hbk-isbn-0521824737-10000-pbk-isbn-0521531837-3495/F09277BD1C3493DAEC1C9777872A980B (дата звернення: 26.06.2023).
Курис П. М. Международные правонарушения и ответственность государства. Вильнюс : Минтис, 1973. 279 с.
Буткевич В. Г. Міжнародне право : основні галузі. Підручник для студентів вищих навчальних закладів. Київ : Либідь, 2004. 814 c.
Василенко В. А. Ответственность государства за международные правонарушения. Киев : Вища школа, 1976. 267 с.
Rainbow Warrior Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Vol. 20. New York, 1990.
United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (Hostages) case. ICJ Reports, 1980. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/64/judgments (дата звернення: 26.06.2023).
ФОРМИ І ВИДИ МІЖНАРОДНО-ПРАВОВОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ ДЕРЖАВИ: Міжнародне право. URL: https://stud.com.ua/90942/pravo/formi_vidi_mizhnarodno_pravovoyi_vidpovidalnosti_derzhavi (дата звернення: 20.06.2022).
Grotius, H The right of war and peace. India : Liberty Fund.. 1021 p.
The site of United Nations. Treaty collection. URL: http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/АYbkvolumes%28e%29/ILC_1956_v2_e.pdf (дата звернення: 20.06.2022).
Barboza Julio International criminal law, 2000. 396 р.
ЗМІСТ КОНЦЕПЦІЇКРИМІНАЛЬНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ ДЕРЖАВИ. URL:http://international-relations.knukim.edu.ua/article/download/177644/177491/392489 (дата звернення: 05.06.2023).
Важна К. А. Концепція кримінальної відповідальності держави: можливість реалізації в сучасному міжнародному праві. Київ : Видавництво Ліра-К, 2017. 292 с.
Зелінська Н. А. Монографія. Одеса: Юридична література, 2006. 568 с.
Важна К. А. ЗМІСТ КОНЦЕПЦІЇ КРИМІНАЛЬНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ ДЕРЖАВИ. Міжнародні відносини: теоретико-практичні аспекти. 2019. Випуск 4, С.129-140.
Важна К. А. Концепція кримінальної відповідальності держави: можливість реалізації в сучасному міжнародному праві. Монографія, Київ : Видавництво Ліра-К., 2017. 282с.
Манийчук Ю. В. Последствия международного правонарушения. Киев: Вища школа, 1987. 147 с.
Higgins R. International law and the avoidance, containment and resolution of disputes: General course of public international law, 1991. 360 р.
Войціховський А. В. Міжнародне право : підручник. Харків : Нац. ун-т внутр. справ, 2020. 544 с.
Edward Newman, Cristina G. Stefan Normative Power Europe. The EU's Embrace of the Responsibility to Protect in a Transitional International Order, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12953 (дата звернення: 26.05.2023).
KIRSTEN AINLEY The Responsibility to Protect and the International Criminal Court: counteracting the crisis, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12185 (дата звернення: 26.05.2023).
ALEX J. BELLAMY The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00729.x (дата звернення: 26.05.2023).
Craig N. Murphy International Relations and Responsibility in an Increasingly Unequal World, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00525.x (дата звернення: 26.05.2023).
ADRIAN GALLAGHER The promise of pillar II: analysing international assistance under the Responsibility to Protect, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12459 (дата звернення: 26.05.2023).
Grotius, H. (2005). The right of war and peace. Liberty Fund, Inc. TSN. https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/2637/Grotius_RightsWarPeace1625.pdf
Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 2023 June, 26). URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/russian/ilc_2009_v1.pdf (In Russian)
Buromensky, M.V. (2006). International law: heading guide. Yurinkom Inter. (In Ukrainian)
Shaw Malcolm, N. (2003). International Law. 5th Edition. Cambridge University Press. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/international-law-by-malcolm-n-shaw-cambridge-cambridge-university-press-2003-5th-edition-xxicxlv1288-pp-hbk-isbn-0521824737-10000-pbk-isbn-0521531837-3495/F09277BD1C3493DAEC1C9777872A980B
Kuris, P. M. (1973). International offenses and responsibility of the state. Mintis. (In Russian)
Butkevych, V. G. (2004). International law: main branches. Lybid. (In Ukrainian)
Vasilenko, V. A. (1976). Responsibility of the state for international offenses. Vishcha school. (In Russian)
Rainbow Warrior (1990). Reports of International Arbitral Awards.
(2023 June, 26). United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (Hostages) case. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/64/judgments
(2023 June, 20). Forms and types of international legal responsibility of the state: International law. URL: https://stud.com.ua/90942/pravo/formi_vidi_mizhnarodno_pravovoyi_vidpovidalnosti_derzhavi (In Ukrainian)
Grotius, H (2005). The right of war and peace. Liberty Fund.
The site of United Nations. Treaty collection. (2023 June, 20).URL: http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/АYbkvolumes%28e%29/ILC_1956_v2_e
Barboza J. International criminal law. 2000. 396 р
(2023 June, 05). Contents of the concept of criminal responsibility of the state. URL: http://international-relations.knukim.edu.ua/article/download/177644/177491/ 392489 (In Ukrainian)
Vazhna, K. A. (2017). Kontseptsiia kryminalnoi vidpovidalnosti derzhavy: mozhlyvist realizatsii v suchasnomu mizhnarodnomu pravi. Lira-K Publishing. (In Ukrainian).
Zelinskaya, N. A. (2006). Monograph. Yuridicheskaya literature. (In Ukrainian)
Vazhna, K. A. (2017). Contents of the concept of criminal responsibility of the state. International relations: theoretical and practical aspects. (In Ukrainian).
Vazhna, K. A. (2017). The concept of state criminal responsibility: the possibility of implementation in modern international law. Monograph. Lira-K. (In Ukrainian).
Maniychuk, Yu. V. (1987). Consequences of an international offense. Vishcha shkola. (In Russian)
Higgins R. (1991). International law and the avoidance, containment and resolution of disputes: General course of public international law.
Wojciechowski A. V. (2020). International law. Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian)
Edward, N., Cristina, G. S. (2019). Normative Power Europe? The EU’s Embrace of the Responsibility to Protect in a Transitional International Order. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.12953
Kirsten A. (2015). The Responsibility to Protect and the International Criminal Court: counteracting the crisis. TSN. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2346.12185
Alex J. B. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00729.
Craig N. (2006). Murphy International Relations and Responsibility in an Increasingly Unequal World. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00525.
Adrian G. (2015). The promise of pillar II: analysing international assistance under the Responsibility to Protect. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2346.12459
Copyright (c) 2023 Станіслав Певко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.