Pedagogical grammar as the framework of tefl research. part 9. the role of consciousness in the foreign language acquisition

  • L. Chernovaty The School of Foreign Languages, Mykola Lukash Translation Studies Department, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-9408
Keywords: acquisition, consciousness, foreign language, learning, teaching

Abstract

The relevance of the paper is accounted for by the need of establishing a common framework to integrate the research in teaching foreign languages, specifically in the development of grammar competence, into a single area with uniform approaches, terminology, and criteria. Its aim is to look for the ways of promoting the efficiency of grammar subskills development by taking into consideration its key features, specifically, the role of consciousness in this process. Basing on the analysis of the native (NLA) and foreign (FLA) language acquisition, the author concludes that one of the main distinctions between the two processes is the degree of actual language awareness on the part of the learners. In the NLA, this process takes place predominantly at the subconscious level (without any actual awareness of the learned material structure and the actions required to use it in communication) with the parallel development of the learners’ thinking. In the FLA, under the conditions of formal learning in the classroom, the probability of the said actual awareness on the part of the learners, due to their higher intellectual development, substantially increases, even disregarding the teaching approach. It does affect the acquisition strategies. In the NLA, children are believed to regard speech as a form of behaviour trying to acquire it through assimilation, accommodation, and adaptation to the rules of this activity. In the FLA, in formal settings, learners are believed to regard it as an intellectual task, trying to reach the aim by appropriate solution methods, i.e. by grasping the structure of the activity, looking for the rules it is based on. The difference between these approaches gives grounds to the learning models based on the opposition of acquisition and learning. According to these models, acquisition is an implicit process, essentially identical to the NLA, generally void of any forms of the target language structure awareness, while learning is an explicit process involving some kind of awareness of the target language rules. The analysis of the available data on the comparative efficiency of acquisition and learning in teaching the foreign language proved their inconsistency and led to the conclusion concerning the need for further study of the problem, which constitutes the prospect of further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Galperin, P.Ja. (1965). Osnovnye rezultaty issledovanija po probleme formirovanija umstvennyh dejstvij i ponjatij [Main Results of the Research into the Development of Mental Actions and Concepts. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Moscow: M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University [in Russian].

Zimnjaja, I.A. (2000). Vvedenie v psiholingvistiku [Introduction into Psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Russian State Humanitarian University [in Russian].

Bihych, O.B. et al. (2013). Metodyka navchannia inozemnykh mov ta kultur: teoriia i praktyka [Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages and Cultures]. Nikolaieva, S.Yu. (Ed.). Kyiv: Lenvit [in Ukrainian].

Chernovaty, L. (1999). Osnovy teorii pedagogicheskoi grammatiki inostrannogo yazyka [The Basics of the Foreign Language Pedagogical Grammar Theory]. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [in Russian].

Bialostock, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 3, pp. 181–206 [in English].

Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [in English].

Ellis, R. (1989). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Oxford Univ. Press [in English].

Ellis, R. (1992). Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell [in English].

Eşi, Marius-Costel. (2010). The didactic principles and their applications in the didactic activity. Sino-US English Teaching. Vol. 7, N 9, pp. 24–34 [in English].

Fujino, H. (2019). L2 learners’ perceptions of grammar: the case of JFL learners in the UK. The Language Learning Journal. Published Online: 01 Mar. 2019 [in English]. DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1080/ 09571736.2019.1578399.

Gholami, L. and Gholami, J. (2020). Uptake in incidental focus-on-form episodes concerning formulaic language in advanced adult EFL classes. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 24, N 2, pp. 189–219 [in English]. DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1177/1362168818783442.

Greg, K. (1984). Krashen’s Monitor and Occam’s Razor. Applied Linguistics. № 5, pp.79–100 [in English].

Hernández, T.A. (2011). Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 15, N 2, pp. 159–182 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388694.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Prentice Hall [in English].

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon [in English].

Krashen, S. (2002). The comprehension hypothesis and its rivals. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching. Fourth Pan-Asian Conference. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company, pp. 395–404 [in English].

Krashen, S. and Pon, P. (1975). An error analysis of an advanced ESL learner: the importance of the Monitor. Working Papers on Bilingualism. Vol. 7, pp. 125–129 [in English].

Leow, R.P. (2018). ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 23, N 4, pp. 476–493 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776674.

Liamkina, O. and Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. The Modern Language Journal. Vol. 96, N 2, pp. 270–289 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-781.2012.01333_1.x.

Liviero, S. (2017). Grammar teaching in secondary school foreign language learning in England: teachers’ reported beliefs and observed practices. The Language Learning Journal. Vol. 45, N 1, pp. 26–50 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1263677.

Marsden, H. and Slabakova, R. (2017). Grammatical meaning and the second language classroom: Introduction. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 23, N 2, pp. 147–157 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752718.

Marton, W. (1990). Some remarks on the anti-pedagogical aspects of Krashen’s theory of second-language acquisition. Studia Anglica Poznaniensia. Vol. 23, pp. 95–110 [in English].

McLaughlin, B. (1978). The Monitor Model: some methodological considerations. Language Learning. Vol. 28, pp. 309–332 [in English].

Mei-Hsing, T. (2018). The effects of explicit instruction on L2 learners’ acquisition of verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 24, N 2, pp. 138–146 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818795188.

Palmer, H. (1964). The Principles of Language Study. London: Oxford Univ. Press [in English].

Rosansky, E. (1975). The critical period for the acquisition of language: some cognitive developmental considerations. Working Papers in Bilingualism. Vol. 6, pp. 92–102 [in English].

Seliger, H. (1979). On the nature and function of language rules in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 13, pp. 359–369 [in English].

Seliger, H., Krashen, S. and Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of a native-like accent in second language learning. Language Sciences. Vol. 36, pp. 20–22 [in English].

Sharwood Smith, M. (1988). Notions and Functions in a Contrastive Pedagogical Grammar. Rutherford, W. and Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.). Grammar and Second Language Teaching. Boston: Heinle and Heinle, pp. 156–170 [in English].

Sharwood Smith, M. (2007). Revisiting the role of consciousness with MOGUL. Han, Z. (Ed.). Understanding Second Language Processes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–15 [in English].

Strevens, P. (1980). Teaching English as an International Language: from Practice to Principle. Oxford: Pergamon Press [in English].

Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N. and Wiltshier, J. (2017). The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 23, N 2, pp. 179–199 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739648.

Published
2020-12-28
How to Cite
Chernovaty, L. (2020). Pedagogical grammar as the framework of tefl research. part 9. the role of consciousness in the foreign language acquisition. Teaching Languages at Higher Educational Establishments at the Present Stage. Intersubject Relations, (37), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.26565/2073-4379-2020-37-08