A model of nationally oriented teaching of Ukrainian and Russian as foreign languages in the modern linguodidactic paradigm
Abstract
From the moment of its establishment the nationally oriented model of foreign language teaching, subject to certain changes in its theoretical understanding and practical use, has been in the center of linguadidactic studies. The article shows dominating trends in the interpretation of this notion in the context of the interaction between universal and nationally specific aspects of teaching a foreign language (Ukrainian and Russian) to speakers of unrelated languages. The authors trace the evolution of approaches to the main principle of this model, which is taking into account the mother languages of students, in the modern educational environment and in connection with the correction of the final goal of learning a language, i.e. teaching communication in a foreign language. The study revealed essential steps forward in subject relevance, content details, didactic and methodological support of the analyzed model of teaching. Special attention was paid to proving the necessity of linguodidactic interpretation of comparative and typological study results of the Ukrainian and Chinese languages aimed at the determination of potential interference zones, detection and systematization of difficulties in the acquisition of particularities of the Ukrainian language and ways of overcoming them. A shift in the linguodidactic description from universal senses, semantic and syntactic relations, and communication intentions to nationally specific forms of their expression seems to be methodically feasible. The article contains characteristics of typical mistakes of Chinese students made at phonetic, word formation and grammar levels, determined by essential structural and systematic differences between mother and target languages as well as peculiarities of cognitive, thinking and educational activities of this student group. Prospective for further studies are didactic and methodic processing of results of the comparison between fragments of Ukrainian and nonrelated mother languages of speakers.
Downloads
References
Akimova, I.I. (2018). O sootnoshenii metodiki i lingvodidaktiki i neobhodimosti orientirovannyh grammaticheskih opisanij russkogo jazyka kak inostrannogo [On Correlation between Methodic and Linguodidactic and Necessity of Grammatically Oriented Descriptions of Russian as a Foreign Language]. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatelskij zhurnal [International Research Journal], Series Philological sciences, 7 (73), July, pp. 135–138 [online]. Available at: https://research-journal.org/languages/ o-sootnoshenii-metodiki-i-lingvodidaktiki-i-neobxodimosti-nacionalno-orientirovannyx-grammaticheskix-opisanij-russkogo-yazyka-kak-inostrannogo/ [Accessed 17 Feb. 2020] [in Russian].
Bobrysheva, I.I. (2004). Kulturno-tipologicheskie stili uchebno-poznavatelnoj dejatelnosti inostrannyh uchashhihsja v metodike obuchenija russkogo jazyka kak inostrannogo [Cultural and Typological Styles of Educational and Cognitive Activity of Foreign Students in Teaching Methods for Russian as a Foreign Language]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Moskow: Pushkin State Russian Language Institute [online]. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/kulturno-tipologicheskie-stili-uchebno-poznavatelnoi-deyatelnosti-inostrannykh-uchashchikhsy/read [Accessed 17 Feb. 2020] [in Russian].
Bulahovskyj, L.A. (1924). Porivnyalne vyvchennya ukrayinskoyi j rosijskoyi mov [Comparative Learning of Ukrainian and Russian Languages]. Shlyah osvity. Put prosveshhenіya [The road to enlightenment]. Kharkiv, 11-12, pp. 74–85 [in Ukrainian].
Cisar, N. (2014). Ukrayinska mova yak inozemna v kytajskij audytoriyi: aspekty mizhkulturnoyi komunikaciyi [Ukrainian as a Foreign Language for Chinese Audience: Intercultural Communication Aspects]. Teoriya i praktyka vykladannya ukrayinskoyi movy yak inozemnoyi [Principles and Practices of Teaching Ukrainian as a Foreign Language]. Lviv, 10, pp. 214–219 [in Ukrainian].
Cymbal, S.V. (2016). Kategoriyi temporalnosti ta lokatyvnosti v movnij kartyni svitu kytajskogo etnosu [Temporality and Locative Category in a Language Picture of the World of the Chinese Ethnic Group]. Odeskyj lingvistychnyj visnyk [Odessa Lingvuistic Bulletin], 7, pp. 210–215 [in Ukrainian].
Kushnir, I. (2019). Suchasna lingvodydaktyka ukrayinskoyi movy yak inozemnoyi: dosyagnennya, problemy, perspektyvy [Modern Linguodidactic of Ukrainian as a Foreign Language: Achievements, Problems, Prospects]. Vykladannya mov u vyshhyh navchalnyh zakladah osvity na suchasnomu etapi. Mizhpredmetni zvyazky [Teaching Languages at Higher Institutions]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 34, pp. 93–107 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.26565/2073-4379-2019-34-07.
Vsevolodova, M.V. (1984). Lingvisticheskie problemy semantizacii grammatiki [Linguistic Problems of Grammar Semantization]. Russkij jazyk za rubezhom [Russian language abroad], 6, pp. 61–66 [in Russian].
Wang, Xiaoxian (2010). Sopostavitelnyj analiz sposobov vyrazhenija prostranstvenno-staticheskih otnoshenij v kitajskom i russkom jazykah [Comparative Analysis of Ways to Express Spatial and Static Relations in the Chinese and Russian Languages]. Sopostavitelnye i istoriko-tipologicheskie issledovanija. Vestnik NGU. Lingvistika i mezhkulturnaja kommunikacija [Comparative and Historical and Typological Studies. Bulletin of NGU. Linguistiс and intercultural communication]. Novosibirsk, Vol. 8, 1, pp. 20–33 [in Russian].
Zajchenko, N. (2020). Nacionalno oriyentovane navchannya inozemnoyi movy v konteksti lingvodydaktychnoyi paradygmy XXI stolittya [Nationally Oriented Teaching a Foreign Language in the Linguodidactival Paradigm of XXI Century]. Komparatyvni doslidzhennya slovyanskyx mov i literatur. Pamyati akademika Leonida Bulaxovskogo [Comparative Studies of Slavic Languages and Literatures. In mem. Leonid Bulakhowskyy]. Kyiv, 36, pp. 37–48 [in Ukrainian].
Zajchenko, N.F. (2017). Stanovlennya i rozvytok lingvodydaktyky ukrayinskoyi movy yak inozemnoyi v Kyivskomu nacionalnomu universyteti imeni Tarasa Shevchenka [Establishment and Development of Linguodidactics of Ukrainian as a Foreign Language in Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University]. Komparatyvni doslidzhennya slovyanskyh mov i literatur. Pamyati akademika Leonida Bulaxovskogo [Comparative Studies of Slavic Languages and Literatures. In mem. Leonid Bulakhowskyy]. Kyiv, pp. 54–63 [in Ukrainian].
Zajchenko, N. and Prysyazhnyuk, N. (1996). Ukrayinska mova v konteksti movnoyi polityky svitu XXI stolittya [Ukrainian Language in World Language Policy Context of XXI Century]. Movoznavstvo: Tezy ta povidomlennya III Mizhnarodnogo kongresu ukrayinistiv [Linguistics: Absracts and reports of the III International Symposium of Ukrainians]. Kharkiv, pp. 13–16 [in Ukrainian].
Zhao, Yujian. (2009). Lingvodidakticheskie osnovy etnoorientirovannogo obuchenija russkomu jazyku i testirovanija: na primere kitajskih uchashhihsja [Linguodidactical Basics of Ethnically Oriented Teaching and Testing Russian Language: Case of Chinese Students] [online]. Moscow. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ etnoorientirovannyy-podhod-k-organizatsii-protsessa-obucheniya-kitayskih-uchaschihsya-russkomu-yazyku-na-dovuzovskom-etape-na-baze/viewer [Accessed 17 Feb. 2020] [in Russian].
