Pro et contra: Discussions about Duels in Russian Publicistic in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries
Abstract
The article reviews the discussions on duel as a social phenomenon which broke out in the Russian journalism in the late 19th and early 20th century. To a significant extent, it was caused by modification of the duel legislation in 1894 when, in accordance with the Rules of Dispute Settlement among Officers, duels were legalised in the officer community and the Court of the Officer Society was granted a new authority: to review “the affairs of honour” and to appoint a duel in some conflict situations at own discretion. This legislative novelty was perceived by the society in different ways. For instance, M. Dragomirov critisised the discretionary power granted to the Court of the Officer Society and considered the new law as discrediting of personal honour which was now set against corporate views on rules and standards of settlement of personal conflicts. P. Levitov and V. V. Nabokov drew attention of the society to duels between the deputies of the State Duma which had become more frequent. A number of authors (B. Adamovich, V. Korolenko, A. Kireev, S. Nedrazhov, etc., maintaining their positions, referred to tragic fates and the last duels of Pushkin and Lermontov which had led to their deaths. The conclusions the publicists drew were absolutely opposite to each other. In the works by theologist and church historian A. Bronzov, duels were considered in the context of the principles of Christian ethics. One of examples of a direct discussion was a work by an anonymous company officer written in response to the article by A. Kireev. This “dialogue” pointed at social injustice contained in the new duel decree as well as at diversity of different points of view at the same phenomenon. The author of the article notes and analyses metaphorical expressions, major plot lines and rhetorical figures which were common for the reviewed discussion. It is noted in the conclusion that this discussion on duels not only clearly emphasised the questions of moral legitimacy of a duel and social status of its participants but also reflected the social tension and cultural barriers common during the late period of the Russian Empire.
Downloads
References
Адамович Б. Что может в вопросах чести доказать поединок? / Б. Адамович. – СПб., 1899. – 5 с.
Бойд Б. Владимир Набоков: русские годы: Биография / Б. Бойд. – М.: Независимая газета; СПб.: Симпозиум, 2001. – 695 с.
Бронзов А. А. К вопросу о дуэли / А. А. Бронзов // Христианское чтение. – 1897. – № 12. – С. 785–804.
Бронзов А. А. «Христианское» самолюбие / А. А. Бронзов // Христианское чтение. – 1897. – № 8. – С. 239–264.
Востриков А. В. Книга о русской дуэли / А. В. Востриков. – СПб.: Азбука-классика, 2004. – 320 с.
Драгомиров М. Дуэли / М. Драгомиров. – К., 1900. – 16 с.
Иванов А. А. «Дело чести»: Депутаты Государственной думы и дуэльные скандалы (1906–1917) / А. А. Иванов. – СПб., Владимир Даль, 2018. – 634 с.
Киреев А. Письма о поединках / А. Киреев. – СПб., 1899. – 60 с.
Короленко В. Г. Русская дуэль в последние годы / В. Г. Короленко // Полное собрание сочинений в 9 т. – СПб., 1914. – Т. 4. – С. 296–302.
Левинг Ю. Антипатия с предысторией / Ю. Левинг // Новое литературное обозрение. – 2009. – № 96. – С. 154–190.
Левитов П. В. О дуэли / П. В. Левитов. – Екатеринослав, 1912. – 8 с.
Мельникова А. А. Дуэль в России в контексте языковой специфики / А. А. Мельникова // Язык и национальный характер. Взаимосвязь структуры языка и ментальности. – СПб.: Речь, 2003. – С. 277–311.
М. Э. Дуэль и честь в истинном освещении / М. Э. – СПб., 1902. – 64 с.
Набоков В. Д. Дуэль и уголовный закон / В. Д. Набоков. – СПб., 1910. – 52 с.
Недражов С. М. Три смерти преждевременного и противоестественного рода. Дуэль, легкомыслием накликанная гибель и казнь / С. М. Недражов. – СПб., 1911. – 54 с.
Полное собрание законов в Российской империи. Собр. 3-е. – СПб., 1898. – Т. 14. – 1529 с.
Против поединков. Ответ генералу Кирееву обер-офицера русской армии. – СПб., 1900. – 68 с.
Рейфман И. Ритуализованная агрессия: Дуэль в русской культуре и литературе / И. Рейфман. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2002. – 336 с.
Снессарев Н. Урок инсинуации / Н. Снессарев // Новое время. – 1911. – № 12786. – С. 4–6.
Теодорович М. Ф. Дуэль и вопросы чести / М. Ф. Теодорович. – М., 1918. – 28 с.
Тургенев И. С. Отцы и дети / И. С. Тургенев // Сочинения в 12 т. – М.: Наука, 1981. – Т. 7. – С. 5–191.
Шавров В. К. Нормировка правил дуэли в законе / В. К. Шавров. – К., 1899. – 39 с.
Экштейн И. Честь в философии и праве / И. Экштейн. – СПб., 1895. – 178 с.
Sholle C. Das Duell in der Russischen Literatur / C. Sholle. – Munchen: Verlag Otto Sagner in Comission, 1977. – S. 195.
Copyright (c) 2019 Marienko M. Yu.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).