The Myth of Remus in the 1st Century BC
Abstract
In the author’s view, the figure of Remus, one of the divine twins and founders of the ‘eternal city’, is unjustly neglected in modern Greek and Roman studies; few academic works deal with him in any depth. In antiquity, however, the figure of Remus long remained quite prominent, especially in the 1st century BC – in the tumultuous era of civil wars, the fall of the Republic, and the establishment of the Principate. Furthermore, his image underwent significant changes during that century. The civil war of the first decades of the 1st century BC was marked by an antagonism between two ideological and political currents — the optimates and populares. Both actively sought to use Remus to their advantage. For the optimates, he was a symbol of discord, one of the initiators of the ‘first civil war’, who opposed his blood brother Romulus, the founder of Rome sanctified by augural and fecial law. The populares perceived Remus as a hero and champion, a patron of the plebs and a model to be emulated. In this period, his image merged with that of another plebeian hero — the legendary king Aventinus. The brothers were even separated geographically: Romulus was associated with the Palatine Hill, and Remus with the Aventine. The establishment of monarchy in Rome caused a sharp change in the role of Remus. In the ideology of Augustus, the brothers were reconciled. Remus was now Romulus’ companion, a symbol and guarantor of peace. The legend of the founding of the City as though prefigured the appearance of a second conditor and the onset of a golden age. The figure of Remus now became synonymous with both Romulus and Rome itself (and his name even came to be associated with the Palatine as well). At the same time, the way Remus was perceived by the contemporaries of Augustus in fact helped spark a dynastic struggle in the house of the first princeps. Augustus himself wanted to appear as Romulus, and portrayed his closest lieutenant and to some extent co-ruler Mark Agrippa as Remus. After Agrippa’s death, Augustus tried to keep up such dynastic duality by using stepsons and adopted sons, but this policy failed with his death and the rise to power of Tiberius, who would not tolerate rivals or welcome new ‘Remi’.
Downloads
References
Alföldi, A. Die Geburt der kaiserlichen Bildsymbolik, 2: Der neue Romulus. Museum Helveticum, Bd. 8, 1951, pp. 190–215.
Badian, E. Sulla’s Augurate. Arethusa, vol. 1, 1968, pp. 26–46.
Beaujeu, J. Le frère de Quirinus (à propos de Virgile, Enéide I, 292 et de Properce IV, 1, 9). In: Mélanges de philosophie, de littérature et d'histoire ancienne offerts à Pierre Boyancé. Rome, 1974, pp. 57–72.
Bremmer, J. Romulus, Remus and the Foundation of Rome. In: J. N. Bremmer, N. M. Horsfall (eds.), Roman Myth and Mythography. London, 1987, pp. 25–48.
Carettoni, G. Das Haus des Augustus auf dem Palatin. Mainz, 1983.
Champlin, E. Tiberius and the Heavenly Twins. Journal of the Roman Studies, vol. 101, 2011, pp. 73–99.
Classen, C. J. Zur Herkunft der Sage von Romulus und Remus. Historia, Bd. 12, 1963, pp. 447–457.
Cornell, T. J. La leggenda délla nascità di Roma. In: A. Carandini, R. Cappelli (eds.), Roma. Romolo, Remo e la fondazione délla città. Milan, 2000, pp. 45–50.
Drossart, P. La mort de Rémus chez Ovide. Revue des études latines, t. 50, 1972, pp. 187–204.
Gagé, J. Romulus-Augustus. Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire de l’École Française de Rome, t. 47, 1930, pp. 138–181.
Hartwig, P. Ein römisches Monument der Kaizerseits mit einer Darstellung des Tempels des Quirinus. Mitteilungen des deutschen archaeologischen Instituts, römische Abteilung, Bd. 19, 1904, pp. 23–37.
Lucot, R. Domus Rémi (Properce IV, 1, 9-10). Pallas, t. 5, 1957, pp. 63–70.
Martin, P. M. La tradition de la double royauté dans la Rome des origines. In: V. Fromentin, S. Gotteland (éds.), Origines gentium. Bordeaux, 2001, pp. 241–262.
Mommsen, Th. Die Remuslegende. Hermes, Bd. 16, 1881, pp. 1–23.
Poulsen, B. The Dioscuri and ruler ideology. Symbolae Osloenses, Vol. 66, 1991, pp. 119–146.
Roddaz, J.-M. Un thème de la «propagande» augustéenne: l’image populaire d’Agrippa. Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire de l’École Française de Rome, T. 92, 1980, pp. 947–956.
Schilling, R. Romulus l’élu et Rémus le réprouvé. Revue des études latines, t. 38, 1960, pp. 182–189.
Scott, K. Drusus, nicknamed «Castor». Classical Philology, vol. 25, 1930, pp. 155–161.
Sumi, G. S. Monuments and memory: the Aedes Castoris in the formation of Augustan ideology. Classical Quaterly, vol. 59, 2009, pp. 167–189.
Tassini, P. Una memoria di Remo alle pendici del Palatino. Archeologia Classica, vol. 45, 1993, pp. 333–350.
Tomažinčič, Š. Remo Cum Fratre Quirinus: Preobrazbe mita o ustanovitvi Rima od začetkov do Horacija. Keria: Studia Latina et Graeca, vol. 10, no. 1, 2008, pp. 7–31.
Ungern-Sternberg, J. Romulus – Versuche, mit einem Stadtgründer Staat zu machen. In: K.-J. Hölkeskamp; E. Stein-Hölkeskamp (Hg.), Von Romulus zu Augustus. Große Gestalten der römischen Republik. München, 2000, pp. 37–47.
Ver Eecke, M. De l’Aventin au Palatin: le nouvel ancrage topographique de Rémus au moment du passage de la République à l’Empire. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, t. 32, 2, 2006, pp. 75–94.
Ver Eecke, M. La République et le roi. Le mythe de Romulus à la fin de la République romaine. Paris, 2008.
Wagenvoort, H. The Crime of Fratricide. The Figure of Romulus-Quirinus in the Political Struggle of the First Century Β. C. In: Wagenvoort, H. Studies in Roman Literature, Culture and Religion. Leiden, 1956, pp. 169–183.
Wiseman, T. P. Remus. A Roman Myth. Cambridge, 1995.
Zanker, P. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor, 1988.
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrii Tokarev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).