Cicero’s Proconsulship in Cilicia: The Foreign Policy Aspect
Abstract
The correspondence of Marcus Tullius Cicero during his term as proconsul of Cilicia provides an opportunity to better understand the complexities of governing Roman provinces during the crisis of the Republic, and above all to assess Rome’s ability to counter external threats. However, the genre of this source has strongly shaped the historiographical tradition, which has come to reflect the view of the events held by the author of most of the letters. Thus, works by modern scholars commonly justify and show full support for the proconsul’s actions. Those isolated studies that try to look critically at Cicero’s efforts during his proconsulship negatively assess the measures taken to counter the Parthian threat but identify the Roman proconsul himself as the culprit for their failure. In our view, Cicero’s correspondence allows us, at least in part, to consider the problem of the Roman provinces in the East as a whole, leaving aside the figure of one particular governor. It can be said with a high degree of confidence that the system of Roman provincial government during the late Republic did not meet the requirements of effective frontier defense in the East. The appointment of governors (proconsuls and propraetors) depended on too many random factors (as did the election of consuls and praetors) for professional managers and military men to always hold these key positions. Cicero’s example is the most striking, but obviously not unique. The elite’s focus on domestic politics automatically made foreign policy tasks secondary. Further, the governors had only limited resources, suitable for localized policing operations but inadequate even against a large-scale plunder raid, not to mention a major invasion. The allies, for many decades protecting the Roman borders with their troops and territories, now for the most part lost even the ability to control their own possessions. Traditional reliance on allied monarchs not only deprived the Romans of military support, but also led to misinformation about the situation at the border. The center’s quick response to instability on the periphery was hampered not only by slow communications, but also by the lack of a clear decision-making mechanism in Rome. Ironically, the Republic was saved by the absence of a real adversary in the East.
Downloads
References
Blom, H. van der Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford, 2010.
Correa, S. Cicero imperator: estrategias de autofiguración epistolar en el viaje a Cilicia (Cic., Att. 5. 1-15). Revista de Estudios Sociales, no. 44, 2012, pp. 48-61.
Danilov, Ye. S. Voina i razvedyvatel'naia deiatel'nost' v antichnom Rime. Iaroslavl', 2011. (In Russian)
Debevoise, N.C. A Рolitical History of Parthia. Chicago, 1938.
Engels, D. Cicéron comme proconsul en Cilicie et la guerre contre les Parthes. Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire, no. 86, 2008, pp. 23-45.
Hunter, L. W. Cicero's Journey to His Province of Cilicia in 51 B.C. The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 3, part 1, 1913, p. 73-97.
Hutchinson, G. O. Cicero's Correspondence: a Literary Study. Oxford, 1998.
Il'inskaya, L. S. Literaturnoe nasledie Tsitserona istochnik dlia izucheniia polozheniia maloaziiskikh provintsii Rima v kontse Respubliki. Vestnik drevnei istorii [Journal of Ancient History], no. 3, 1966, s. 149-163. (In Russian)
Kamienik, R. Zabiegi Cycerona o triumf i ich niepowodzenie. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, no. 930, Antiquitas XIV, 1988, p. 89-98.
Leach, E. W. Cicero’s Cilician Correspondence: Space and Auctoritas. Arethusa, vol. 49, iss. 3, 2016, p. 503—523.
Lintott, A. Cicero as Evidence. A Historian's Companion. Oxford, 2008.
Liong, K. A. Cicero de re militari: a civilian perspective on military matters in the late Republic. Edinburgh, 2011.
Litovchenko, S. D. Rim i Velikaia Armeniia v kontse 50–40-kh gg. I v. do n. e. Vestnik Khar'kovskogo natsional'nogo universiteta imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Istoriia» [The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: History], vyp. 35, 2003, s. 13-22. (In Russian)
Litovchenko, S. D. Velikaya Armeniia vo vremia tret'ei voiny Rima s Mitridatom VI. Drevnosti 2009 [Antiquities 2009], vyp. 8, 2009, s. 107-115. (In Russian)
Litovchenko, S. D. Tsarstvovaniye Tigrana II Velikogo v Sirii: problemy khronologii. Antichnyi mir i arkheologiia [Ancient World and Archeology], vyp. 17, 2015, s. 176-191. (In Russian)
Litovchenko, S. D. Tsitseron na Vostoke: gibel' Respubliki. V sb.: Istoriia antichnogo mira i srednevekov'ia v universitetakh Ukrainy. K 40-letiiu kafedry istorii drevnego mira i srednikh vekov KHNU imeni V. N. Karazina. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Khar'kov, 25–26 oktiabria 2018 g.). Khar'kov, 2018, s. 39–40. (In Russian)
Litovchenko, S. D. Syriam esse nostram… (Cic. Flac. 30). Pochemu Pompei prevratil gosudarstvo Selevkidov v rimskuiu provintsiiu? Drevnosti 2019 [Antiquities 2009], vyp. 17, 2019, s. 8-19. (In Russian)
Magie, D. Roman Rule in Asia Minor to the end of the third century after Christ. v. 1. Text. Princeton, New Jersey, 1950.
Marshall, A. Governors on the Move. Phoenix, vol. 20, no. 3, 1966, p. 231-246.
Mundt, F. Ciceros "Commentarioli belli Ciliciensis". Fam. 15, 4 und andere Briefe aus Kilikien. Philologus, 148, 2004, S. 255-273.
Prantl, H. Artavasdes II. — Freund oder Feind der Römer? In: Freundschaft und Gefolgschaft in den auswärtigen Beziehungen der Römer (2. Jh. v.Chr. — 1. Jh. n.Chr.), Frankfurt am Main, 2008.
Richardson, J. The administration of the empire. Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. IX: The Last Age of the Roman Republic, 146–43 BC. Cambridge, 1992, p. 564-598.
Rawson, E. Cicero, a Portrait. London, 1975.
Sheldon, R.M. Intelligence Activities in Ancient Rome: Trust in the Gods, but Verify. London, New York, 2005.
Sherwin-White, A. N. Roman Foreign Policy in the East: 168 B.C. to A. D. 1. London, 1984.
Sonnabend, H. Fremdenbild und Politik. Vorstellungen der Römer von Ägypten und dem Partherreich in der Späten Republik und Frühen Kaiserzeit. Frankfurt, 1986.
Tempest, K. Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome. London, New York, 2011.
Thompson, L. A. Cicero's Succession - Problem in Cilicia. American Journal of Philology, vol. 86, iss. 4, 1965, p. 375–386.
Tozan, M. Cicero’nun Cilicia valiliği. The Cilician Governorship of Cicero. Cedrus, no. 4, 2016, 105-126.
Wiseman, T. P. Caesar, Pompey and Rome. Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. IX: The Last Age of the Roman Republic, 146–43 BC. Cambridge, 1992, p. 368-423.
Wistrand, E. Felicitas Imperatoria. Göteborg, 1987.
Copyright (c) 2021 Sergey Litovchenko
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).