Manifestations and consequences of water conflicts: case study of the Pechenihy reservoir, Kharkiv region, Ukraine

Keywords: water conflicts, Pechenihy reservoir, hostilities, hydrological resources, geoecological state

Abstract

Statement of the problem. The article discusses the manifestations and consequences of such conflicts, in particular their impact on the Pechenihy Reservoir. The study of the problem of water clashes and its exhaustive justification is an important step in the development of effective strategies for managing water resources and preventing the negative consequences of conflicts. Despite the generally defined interpretation of water conflicts, the term should be considered more thoroughly as a phenomenon, based on its duality, because such conflicts can be provoked by different reasons, and therefore their course and consequences may differ. The study of the problem of water clashes and its exhaustive justification is an important step in the development of effective strategies for managing water resources and preventing the negative consequences of conflicts. The study of the problems of water conflicts with the example of the Pechenihy reservoir is due to the novelty of the problem faced by this reservoir. For the first time, the Pechenihy reservoir witnessed large-scale hostilities and, accordingly, for the first time in the history of its existence, faced the devastating consequences of the war. A comprehensive characterization of the reservoir as a center of local water skirmish is necessary, especially in the context of determining the manifestations and classifications of water conflicts.

The aim of the work is to set out the causes, classifications and consequences of water conflicts that arise in the context of the use of water resources based on the example of the Pechenihy reservoir. The article aims at a comprehensive analysis of the impact of these conflicts on the geo-ecological and social spheres.

Methods. In addition to general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and generalization, geographical methods of research were used. A special place was occupied by the methods of space hydrology (deciphering aerospace images of the reservoir). The applied method of system analysis helped to identify and clearly classify the situation around the studied reservoir as a local water conflict with the identification of the problem and the way of its course.

Results. The study substantiates the phenomenon of water conflicts, highlighting their dual nature as both geo-ecological and social issues, exacerbated by military operations. The hydrological and technical characteristics of the Pechenihy reservoir were examined, revealing significant geo- and hydroecological problems due to nearby combat activities. The study provides a first-time analysis of local water conflict events from the onset of the Russian invasion to the Kharkiv counteroffensive, classifying the conflict around the Pechenihy reservoir as armed, with water serving as both a victim and weapon.

The novelty of this article is manifested in an in-depth study of the specifics of hydroecological conflicts in the conditions of long-term hostilities around the Pechenihy reservoir, followed by a comprehensive analysis of the geoecological and social aspects of this problem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kateryna Borysenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor of the Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

Simon M. Hutchinson , University of Salford

PhD (Palaeolimnology), Associate Professor, School of Sciences, Engineering and Environment

Diana Sinchuk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

BSc student, Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

References

Başlar K. (2001). Two facets of the Aegean Sea dispute: 'de lege lata' and 'de lege ferenda'. Turkey and internation-al law. Ankara. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20060822022924/http://www.turkishweekly.net/pdf/

aegean_sea.pdf (accessed 10.05.2024).

Sentinel Hub, https://www.sentinel-hub.com, Sinergise Solutions d.o.o., a Planet Labs company.

Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security. In International Securi-ty. 18, 1: 79. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539033

Murakami, M., Jansky, L., & Pachova, N. I. (2004). The Danube : environmental monitoring of an international river. UN University Press. XVII: 172. Available at: http://digitallibrary.un.org/record/532592 (accessed 10.05.2024).

Swaine, A. (1993). Conflicts Over Water. In Security Dialogue. 24, 4: 429–439. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010693024004009

Oki, T., & Quiocho, R. E. (2020). Economically challenged and water scarce: identification of global populations most vulnerable to water crises. In International Journal of Water Resources Development (Vol. 36, Issues 2–3, pp. 416–428). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1698413 (accessed 12.05.2024).

Water Conflict – World Water. (n.d.). Available at: http://www.worldwater.org/water-conflict/

Influence of military actions on the state of the Pechenihy reservoir. (2023). Environmental Protection: A collection of scientific articles of the XVIIIth All-Ukrainian scientific Taliiv readings, 75–78. https://ecology.karazin.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/taliev-2022.pdf (accessed 15.05.2024).

Gorbulin V., Mosov S. (2023). Water conflicts as an indicator of aggravation of the world crisis of fresh water. Bul-letin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 2: 3–11. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications). https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2023.02.003

Gorev, L., & Doroguntsov, S. (1997). Optimization of Eco-Environments. Naukova Dumka.

Ivaniuta, S. (2019). Priority directions of neutralization of ecological and technogenic threats in the zone of mili-tary conflict in donbas. Strategic Priorities, 50(2), 38-45.

Lossovsky, I. (2014). International experience of solving "water conflicts" in the context of determining the strate-gy of water supply in Crimea. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law, 80-90.

Gorev, L., Nikanorov, A., & Peleshenko, V. (1989). Regional hydrochemistry. Vyscha shkola.

Peleshenko V. Gorev L. (1985) The methodology of hydrochemical research. Vyscha shkola.

Strokal, V., & Kovpak, A. (2023). Military conflicts and water: consequences and risks. In Ecological Sciences. 44, 5: 94–102). State Ecology Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2022.eco.5-44.14

Peleshenko V. (1975). Evaluation of the relationship between the chemical composition of different types of natu-ral waters (on the example of the plain part of the territory of Ukraine). Vyscha shkola.

Khilchevskyi, V. K. (2023). Water and armed conflicts – classification features: in the world and in Ukraine. In Hydrology, hydrochemistry and hydroecology. 1(63): 6–19. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. https://doi.org/10.17721/2306-5680.2022.1.1

Published
2024-06-01
Cited
How to Cite
Borysenko, K., Hutchinson , S. M., & Sinchuk, D. (2024). Manifestations and consequences of water conflicts: case study of the Pechenihy reservoir, Kharkiv region, Ukraine. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Geology. Geography. Ecology", (60), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2024-60-12